The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off


Research articles communicate original scientific research to their target audience, shaping individual careers and ultimately, scientific paradigms themselves. Writing a high-quality manuscript requires substantial investment of time and effort, but without careful optimization, success of the final product is far from being assured. To address this, we used a meta-survey approach to identify the key determinants of a positive editorial reception. Interestingly, scientific writing and overall manuscript quality emerged as the major determinants of editorial response, irrespective of the journal background. However, writing a high-quality manuscript is often a challenging task for seasoned researchers; for a novice it might prove to be overwhelming. In recognition of this, the present article aims to streamline the manuscript development process for seamless conversion of novel experimental findings into a well-written paper. To this end, we have deconstructed the scientific writing process into seven salient steps, starting from conceptualization to final post-publication networking

Keywords

Appeals, bioscience manuscript, peer review, rebuttal, revision, scientific communication.
User
Notifications
Font Size