Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The demerits of meta-analysis in science


Affiliations
1 Division of Environment Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India, India
2 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India, India
 

No Abstract.

Keywords

No keywords
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Philibert, A., Loyce, C. and Makowski, D., Agric., Ecosyst. Environ., 2012, 148, 72–82.
  • Brandt, K., Srednicka-Tober, D., Baranski, M., Sanderson, R., Leifert, C. and Seal, C., J. Agric. Food Chem., 2013, 61, 7173–7180.
  • Glass, G. V., 2000; http://glass.ed.asu.edu/ gene/papers/meta25.html (accessed on 10 June 2007).
  • Hedges, L. V., Rev. Res. Educ., 1982, 13, 353–398.
  • Campbell, D. T. and Stanley, J. C., Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research, Rand McNally, Chicago, USA, 1966.
  • Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T. and Day, A., Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1979, vol. 351.
  • Cooper, H. M., The Integrative Literature Review: A Systematic Approach, Sage, CA, USA, 1984.
  • Glass, G. V., J. Res. Sci. Teach., 1982, 19(2), 93–112.
  • Glass, G. V., Mc Gaw, B. and Smith, M.
  • L., Meta-Analysis in Social Research, Sage, CA, USA, 1981.
  • Cooper, H. M., Rev. Educ. Res., 1982, 52(2), 291–302.
  • Hunter, J. E. and Schmidt, F. L., Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, Sage, CA, USA, 1990.
  • Hedges, L. V., Stat. Sci., 1992, 7(2), 246– 256.
  • Pham, B., Platt, R., McAuley, L., Klassen, T. P. and Moher, D., Eval. Health Prof., 2001, 24(2), 109–125.
  • Copas, J. and Shi, J. Q., Biostatistics, 2000, 1(3), 247–262.
  • Light, R. J. and Pillemer, D. B., Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1984.
  • Iyengar, S. and Greenhouse, J. B., Stat. Sci., 1988, 3(1), 109–135.
  • Rosenthal, R., Psychol. Bull., 1979, 86, 638–641.
  • Duval, S. and Tweedie, R., J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 2000, 95(449), 89–98.
  • Givens, G. H., Smith, D. D. and Tweedie, R. L., Stat. Sci., 1997, 12(4), 221–250.
  • Murtaugh, P. A., Ecology, 2002, 84(4), 1162–1166.
  • Sutton, A. J., Song, F., Gilbody, S. M. and Abrams, K. R., Stat. Methods Med. Res., 2000, 9, 421–455.
  • Kraemer, H. C., Gardner, C., Brooks III, J. O. and Yesavage, J. A., Psychol. Methods, 1998, 3, 23–31.
  • Rosenthal, R. and DiMatteo, M. R., Annu. Rev. Psychol., 2001, 52(1), 59–82.
  • Cheung, S. F. and Chan, D. K. S., J. Appl. Psychol., 2004, 89(5), 780–791.
  • Gleser, L. J. and Olkin, I., In The Handbook of Research Synthesis (eds Cooper, H. and Hedges, L. V.), Sage, New York, USA, 1994, pp. 339–355.
  • Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L. and Rubin, D. B., Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.
  • Shelby, B., Vaske, J. J. and Heberlein, T. A., Leis. Sci., 1989, 11, 269–291

Abstract Views: 305

PDF Views: 125




  • The demerits of meta-analysis in science

Abstract Views: 305  |  PDF Views: 125

Authors

Ranjan Bhattacharyya
Division of Environment Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India, India
Avijit Ghosh
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India, India

Abstract


No Abstract.

Keywords


No keywords

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv122%2Fi12%2F1365-1366