Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Macrofungal diversity and distribution in Kishtwar High Altitude National Park, Jammu and Kashmir, India


Affiliations
1 Department of Botany, University of Jammu, Jammu 180 006, India
2 Department of Botany, Government Degree College, Basohli 184 201, India
 

The present study was conducted at 10 sites in Kishtwar High Altitude National Park (KHANP), Jammu and Kashmir, India, with the objective to analyse the diver­sity and distribution of macrofungal communities. A total of 40 permanent plots (four plots in each site) were established and macrofungal fruiting bodies were recorded monthly from each plot between July 2015 and October 2017. Diversity indices and canonical correspondence analysis were applied to determine the composition and environmental factors responsible for structuring the macrofungal communities in the study area. In total, 83 wild macrofungal species were identified belonging to 35 genera, 24 families and 9 orders. Humicolous fungi were the most dominant group of macrofungi contributing 71.8% of the total dominance, followed by lignicolous fungi (11.8%). The distribution of fruiting bodies of macrofungal species was mainly in groups, i.e. aggregated pattern (75.9%). The diversity indices varied from 20 to 37 (richness), 2.04 to 3.16 (Menhinick), 4.14 to 7.25 (Margalef ), 0.03 to 0.06 (Simpson’s dominance), 2.91 to 3.49 (Shannon–Wiener’s diversity), 0.86 to 0.95 (evenness), 7.69 to 16.29 (Fisher’s alpha) and 0.05 to 0.12 (Berger–Parker diversity). Canonical correspondence analysis revea­led that Scleroderma verrucosum, Boletus granulatus and Ramaria formosa were the most important species, and that mean temperature and rainfall were the key environmental factors responsible for the diversity and distribution of macrofungi in the present study.

Keywords

Agaricomycetes, Diversity and Distribution, Environmental Factors, Macrofungal Communities, National Park
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Swift, M. J., Heal, O. W. and Anderson, J. M., Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. In Studies in Ecology, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK, 1979.

  • Muthukrishnan, S., Sanjayan, K. P. and Jahir, H. K., Species composition, seasonal changes and community ordination of alkalotolerant micro fungal diversity in a natural scrub jungle ecosystem of Tamil Nadu, India. Mycosphere, 2012, 3(2), 92–109.

  • Kjoller, A. and Struwe, S., Microfungi in ecosystems: fungal occurrence and activity in litter and soil. Oikos, 1982, 39, 389– 422.

  • Ambrosio, E., Lancellotti, E., Brotzu, R., Salch, H., Franceschini, A. and Zotti, M., Assessment of macrofungal diversity in a Silver Fir plantation in Sardinia (Italy) using a standardized sampling procedure. Micol. Ital., 2015, 44, 1–17.

  • Ortega, O., Lorite, J. and Valle, F., Mycorrhizal macrofungi diversity (Agaricomycetes) from Mediterranean Quercus forests – a compilation for the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal). Nova Hedwigia, 2010, 91, 1–31.

  • Claridge, A. W., Barry, S. C., Cork, S. J. and Trappe, J. M., Diversity and habitat relationships of hypogeous fungi II. Factors influencing the occurrence and number of taxa. Biodivers. Conserv., 2000, 9, 175–199.

  • Jones, M. D., Durall, D. M. and Cairney, J. W. G., Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in young forest stands regenerating after clear-cut logging. New Phytol., 2003, 157, 399–422.

  • Trudell, S. A. and Edmonds, R. L., Macrofungus communities correlate with moisture and nitrogen abundance in two old-growth conifer forests, Olympic National Park, Washington, USA. Can. J. Bot., 2004, 82, 781–800.

  • Toljander, J. F., Eberhardt, U., Toljander, Y. K., Paul, L. R. and Taylor, A. F. S., Species composition of an ectomycorrhizal fungal community along a local nutrient gradient in a boreal forest. New Phytol., 2006, 170, 873–884.

  • Courty, P., Franc, A., Pierrat, J. and Garbaye, J., Temporal changes in the ectomycorrhizal community in two soil horizons of a temperate oak forest. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2008, 74, 5792–5801.

  • Smith, S. E. and Read, D. J., Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, Elsevier Ltd, Oxford, UK, 2008, 3rd edn.

  • Morris, M. H., Pérez-Pérez, M. A., Smith, M. E. and Bledsoe, C. S., Influence of host species on ectomycorrhizal communities associated with two co-occurring oaks (Quercus spp.) in a tropical cloud forest. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 2009, 69, 274–287.

  • Cox, F., Barsoum, N., Lilleskov, E. A. and Bidartondo, M. I., Nitrogen availability is a primary determinant of conifer mycorrhizas across complex environmental gradients. Ecol. Lett., 2010, 13, 1103–1113.

  • O’Hanlon, R. and Harrington, T. J., Macrofungal diversity and ecology in four Irish forest types. Fungal Ecol., 2012, 5, 499–508.

  • Talbot, J. M. et al., Independent roles of ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic communities in soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Biol. Biochem., 2013, 57, 282–291.

  • Ferris, R., Peace, A. J. and Newton, A. C., Macrofungal communities of lowland Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karsten.] plantations in England: relationships with site factors and stand structure. For. Ecol. Manage., 2000, 131, 255–267. in Veracruz, Mexico Botany, 2011, 89, 203–216.

  • Brown, N., Bhagwat, S. and Watkinson, S., Macrofungal diversity in fragmented and disturbed forests of the Western Ghats of India. J. Appl. Ecol., 2006, 43, 11–17.

  • Gomez-Hernandez, M. and Williams-Linera, G., Diversity of macromycetes determined by tree species, vegetation structure, and microenvironment in tropical cloud forests.

  • Lopez-Quintero, C. A., Straatsma, G., Franco-Molano, A. E. and Boekhout, T., Macrofungal diversity in Colombian Amazon forests varies with regions and regimes of disturbance. Biodivers. Conserv., 2012, 21, 2221–2243.

  • Pradhan, P., Dutta, A. K., Paloi, S., Roy, A. and Acharya, K., Diversity and distribution of macrofungi in the Eastern Himalayan ecosystem. Eurasian J. Biosci., 2016, 10, 1–12.

  • Reverchon, F., del Ortega-Larrocea, P. M. and Pérez-Moreno, J., Saprophytic fungal communities change in diversity and species composition across a volcanic soil chronosequence at Sierra del Chichinautzin, Mexico. Ann. Microbiol., 2010, 60, 217–226.

  • Durall, D. M., Gamiet, S., Simard, S. W., Kudrna, L. and Sakakibara, S. M., Effects of clear cut logging and tree species composition on the diversity and community composition of epigeous fruit bodies formed by ectomycorrhizal fungi. Can. J. Bot., 2006, 84, 966–980.

  • McMullan-Fisher, S. J. M., Kirkpatrick, J. B., May, T. W. and Pharo, E. J., Surrogates for macrofungi and mosses in reservation planning. Conserv. Biol., 2009, 24, 730–736.

  • Brunner, I., Brunner, F. and Laursen, G. A., Characterization and comparison of macrofungal communities in an Alnus tenuifolia and an Alnus crispa forest in Alaska. Can. J. Bot., 1992, 70, 1247– 1258.

  • Bacha, M. S., Snow leopard recovery programme for Kishtwar High Altitude National Park, Jammu and Kashmir State, 1986–87 to 1989–90. Department of Wildlife Protection, Srinagar, 1986, p. 51.

  • Sharma, S. and Hamal, I. A., Wild edibles of Kishtwar High Altitude National Park in Northwest Himalaya, Jammu and Kashmir (India). Ethnobot. Leafl., 2009, 13, 195–202.

  • Smith, A. H., The North American species of Naematoloma. Mycologia, 1951, 43, 467–521.

  • Zoberi, M. H., Tropical Macrofungi: Some Common Species, Macmillan, London, UK, 1972, pp. 55–116.

  • Singer, R., The Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy (4th edition), Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany, 1986, p. 981.

  • Teng, S. C., A Contribution to our Knowledge of the Higher Fungi of China, Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, 1988, p. 507.

  • Kumar, A., Bhatt, R. P. and Lakhanpal, T. N., The Amanitaceae of India, Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, 1990, p. 160.

  • Minnis, A. M. and Sundberg, W. J., Pluteus section Celluloderma in the USA. North Am. Fungi, 2010, 5, 1–107.

  • Dias, R. L. and Cortez, V. G., New records of Pluteus (Agaricales) from Parana State, Brazil. Mycosphere, 2013, 4, 937–943.

  • Gelardi, M., Vizzini, A., Ercole, E., Voyron, S., Gang, W. and Liu, X. Z., Strobilomycese chinocephalus sp. nov. (Boletales) from south-western China, and a key to the genus Strobilomyces worldwide. Mycol. Prog., 2013, 12, 575–588.

  • Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. and Jarvis, A., Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol., 2005, 25, 1965–1978.

  • Kalra, Y. P. and Maynard, D. G., Organic carbon determination by wet digestion (modified Walkley–Black procedure). In Methods Manual for Forest Soil and Plant Analysis, Forestry Canada, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta Information Report NOR-X-319, 1991, pp. 27–30.

  • McDonald, J. H., Handbook of Biological Statistics, Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 2014, p. 291.

  • Legendre, P. and Gallagher, E. D., Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia, 2001, 129, 271–280.

  • Fisher, R. A., Statistical Methods for Research Workers, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, UK, 1925.

  • Shannon, C. E. and Wiener, W., The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, USA, 1963.

  • Simpson, E. M., Measurement of diversity. Nature, 1949, 163, 688.

  • Margalef, R., Temporal succession and spatial heterogeneity in phytoplankton. In Perspective in Marine Biology (ed. BuzzatiTraverso), University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA, 1958, pp. 323–347.

  • Menhinick, E. F., A comparison of some species diversity indices applied to samples of field insects. Ecology, 1964, 45, 858–862.

  • Pielou, E. C., The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. Theor. Biol., 1966, 13, 131–144.

  • Whittaker, R. H., Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science, 1965, 147, 250–260.

  • ter Braak, C. J. F., Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. J. Ecol., 1986, 67, 1167–1179.

  • ter Braak, C. J. F., Ordination in data analysis. In Community and Landscape Ecology (eds Jongman, R., ter Braak, C. J. F. and van Tongeren, O.), Pudoc Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1995, pp. 91–173.

  • ter Braak, C. J. F. and Šmilauer, P., Canoco Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (v. 4.5), Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, USA, 2002.

  • Šmilauer, P., CanoDraw User’s Guide 3.1, Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, USA, 1997, p. 887.

  • Salerni, E., Laganà, A., Perini, C., Loppi, S. and De Dominicis, V., Effects of temperature and rainfall on fruiting of macrofungi in oak forest of the Mediterranean area. Israel J. Plant Sci., 2002, 50, 189–198.

  • Ortega, A. and Lorite, J., Macrofungi diversity in cork-oak and holm-oak forests in Andalusia (southern Spain): an efficient parameter for establishing priorities for its evaluation and conservation. Central Eur. J. Biol., 2002, 2(2), 1–27.

  • Bhandari, B. and Jha, S. K., Comparative study of macrofungi in different patches of Boshan Community Forest in Kathmandu, Central Nepal. Bot. Orient. – J. Plant Sci., 2017, 11, 43–48.

  • Dix, N. J. and Webster, J., Fungal Ecology, Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 1995.

  • Ohlson, M., Söderström, L., Hörnberg, G., Zackrisson, O. and Hermansson, J., Habitat qualities versus long-term continuity as determinants of biodiversity in boreal old-growth swamp forests. Biol. Conserv., 1997, 18(3), 221–231.

  • Mueller, G. M. et al., Global diversity and distribution of macrofungi. Biodivers. Conserv., 2007, 16, 37–48.

  • Cairney, J. W. G., Basidiomycete mycelia in forest soils: dimensions, dynamics and roles in nutrient distribution. Mycol. Res., 2005, 109, 7–20.

  • Dighton, J., Fungi in Ecosystem Processes, Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, 2003.

  • Horton, T. R. and Bruns, T. D., The molecular revolution in the ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into t black-box. Mol. Ecol., 2001, 10, 1855–1871.

  • Richard, F., Moreau, P. A., Selosse, M. A. and Gardes, M., Diversity and fruiting patterns of ectomycorrhizal and saprobic fungi in an old-growth Mediterranean forest dominated by Quercus ilex L. Can. J. Bot., 2004, 82, 1711–1729.

  • Kent, B. M. and Dress, P. E., Convergence of forest stand spatial pattern over time – case of random initial spatial pattern. For. Sci., 1979, 25, 445–451.

  • Kent, B. M. and Dress, P. E., On the convergence of forest stand spatial pattern over time – the cases of regular and aggregated initial spatial patterns. For. Sci., 1980, 26, 10–22.

  • Schmit, J. P., Murphy, J. F. and Mueller, G. M., Macrofungal diversity of a temperate oak forest: a test of species richness estimators. Can. J. Bot., 1999, 77, 1014–1027.

  • Hawksworth, D. L., The magnitude of fungal diversity: the 1.5 million species estimate revisited. Mycol. Res., 2001, 105, 1422–1432.

  • Caiafa, M. V., Gomez-Hernandez, M., Williams-Linera, G. and Ramírez-Cruz, V., Functional diversity of macromycete communities along an environmental gradient in a Mexican seasonally dry tropical forest. Fungal Ecol., 2017, 28, 66–75.

  • Piepenbring, M., Hofmann, T. A., Miranda, E., Caceres, O. and Unterseher, M., Leaf shedding and weather in tropical dryseasonal forest shape the phenology of fungi – lessons from two years of monthly surveys in southwestern Panama. Fungal Ecol., 2015, 18, 83–92

  • Straatsma, G. and Krisai-Greilhuber, I., Assemblage structure, species richness, abundance, and distribution of fungal fruiting bodies in a seven years plot based survey near Vienna. Mycol. Res., 2003, 107, 632–640.

  • O’Hanlon, R. and Harrington, T. J., Diversity and distribution of mushroom-forming fungi (Agaricomycetes) in Ireland. In Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, Royal Irish Academy, Dublin, Ireland, 2011, pp. 117–133.

  • Whittaker, R. H., Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 1975, 21, 213–251.

  • May, R. M., Stability in multispecies community models. Math. Biosci., 1971, 12, 59–79.

  • Büntgen, U., Kauserud, H. and Egli, S., Linking climate variability to mushroom productivity and phenology. Front. Ecol. Environ., 2011, 10, 14–19.

  • Tedersoo, L. et al., Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science, 2014, 346, 12566–12588.

  • Setälä, H. and McLean, M. A., Decomposition rate of organic substrates in relation to the species diversity of soil saprophytic fungi. Oecologia, 2004, 139, 98–107.

  • Bolhassan, M. H. et al., Diversity and distribution of polyporales in Peninsular Malaysia. Sains Malays., 2012, 41(2), 155–161.


Abstract Views: 357

PDF Views: 147




  • Macrofungal diversity and distribution in Kishtwar High Altitude National Park, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Abstract Views: 357  |  PDF Views: 147

Authors

Y. P. Sharma
Department of Botany, University of Jammu, Jammu 180 006, India
S. A. J. Hashmi
Department of Botany, University of Jammu, Jammu 180 006, India
Roshi Sharma
Department of Botany, University of Jammu, Jammu 180 006, India
Sanjeev Kumar
Department of Botany, University of Jammu, Jammu 180 006, India
R. K. Manhas
Department of Botany, Government Degree College, Basohli 184 201, India

Abstract


The present study was conducted at 10 sites in Kishtwar High Altitude National Park (KHANP), Jammu and Kashmir, India, with the objective to analyse the diver­sity and distribution of macrofungal communities. A total of 40 permanent plots (four plots in each site) were established and macrofungal fruiting bodies were recorded monthly from each plot between July 2015 and October 2017. Diversity indices and canonical correspondence analysis were applied to determine the composition and environmental factors responsible for structuring the macrofungal communities in the study area. In total, 83 wild macrofungal species were identified belonging to 35 genera, 24 families and 9 orders. Humicolous fungi were the most dominant group of macrofungi contributing 71.8% of the total dominance, followed by lignicolous fungi (11.8%). The distribution of fruiting bodies of macrofungal species was mainly in groups, i.e. aggregated pattern (75.9%). The diversity indices varied from 20 to 37 (richness), 2.04 to 3.16 (Menhinick), 4.14 to 7.25 (Margalef ), 0.03 to 0.06 (Simpson’s dominance), 2.91 to 3.49 (Shannon–Wiener’s diversity), 0.86 to 0.95 (evenness), 7.69 to 16.29 (Fisher’s alpha) and 0.05 to 0.12 (Berger–Parker diversity). Canonical correspondence analysis revea­led that Scleroderma verrucosum, Boletus granulatus and Ramaria formosa were the most important species, and that mean temperature and rainfall were the key environmental factors responsible for the diversity and distribution of macrofungi in the present study.

Keywords


Agaricomycetes, Diversity and Distribution, Environmental Factors, Macrofungal Communities, National Park

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv122%2Fi12%2F1415-1425