Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Differential Loss of Glacier Stored Water in the Indus River Basin


Affiliations
1 Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, Goa Campus, Goa 403 726, India
2 DST Centre for Excellence in Climate Change, Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
3 Space Applications Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Ahmedabad 380 015, India
 

In this study, we assessed the glacier stored water (1,620 ± 340 Gt) using a combination of ice dynamics modelling and volume–area scaling method and estimated glacier mass loss (6.4%) from 2001 to 2013 for the Indus River basin. Results indicate that the impact of climate change is not uniform across the basin, especially the stark difference between the Western Himalayan region where the glaciers are losing mass at the rate of –0.56 ± 0.27 m.w.e. per annum and the Upper Indus where the loss is at –0.18 ± 0.11 m.w.e. per annum.

Keywords

Climate Change, Glacier Stored Water, Improved Accumulation Area Ratio, Mass Balance, River Basin.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Wester, P., Mishra, A., Mukherji, A. and Shrestha, A. B., The Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment: Mountains, Climate Change, Sustainability and People, Springer Nature, Switzerland, 2019, chapter 1, table 1.2, p. 5.

  • Pritchard, H. D., Asia’s shrinking glaciers protect large populations from drought stress. Nature, 2019, 569(7758), 649–654.

  • Mujumdar, P. P. and Tiwari, V. M., Water Futures of India: Status of Science and Technology, Indian National Science Academy, New Delhi, 2019.

  • Abdullah, T., Romshoo, S. A. and Rashid, I., The satellite observed glacier mass changes over the Upper Indus Basin during 2000–12. Sci. Rep., 2020, 10(1), 1–9.

  • Shean, D. E., Bhushan, S., Montesano, P., Rounce, D. R., Arendt, A. and Osmanoglu, B., A systematic, regional assessment of high mountain Asia glacier mass balance. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 7, 363.

  • Hugonnet, R. et al., Accelerated global glacier mass loss in the early twenty-first century. Nature, 2021, 592(7856), 726–731.

  • Zemp, M. et al., Global glacier mass changes and their contributions to sea-level rise from 1961 to 2016. Nature, 2019, 568(7752), 382–386.

  • Muhammad, S., Tian, L. and Khan, A., Early twenty-first century glacier mass losses in the Indus Basin constrained by density assumptions. J. Hydrol., 2019, 574, 467–475.

  • Brun, F., Berthier, E., Wagnon, P., Kääb, A. and Treichler, D., A spatially resolved estimate of high mountain Asia glacier mass balances from 2000 to 2016. Nature Geosci., 2017, 10(9), 668–673.

  • Maurer, J. M., Schaefer, J. M., Rupper, S. and Corley, A., Acceleration of ice loss across the Himalayas over the past 40 years. Sci. Adv., 2019, 5(6), eaav7266.

  • Farinotti, D., Immerzeel, W. W., de Kok, R. J., Quincey, D. J. and Dehecq, A., Manifestations and mechanisms of the Karakoram glacier anomaly. Nature Geosci., 2020, 13(1), 8–16.

  • Kumar, P., Md Saharwardi, Banerjee, A., Mohd Azam, Dubey, A. K. and Murtugudde, R., Snowfall variability dictates glacier mass balance variability in Himalaya–Karakoram. Sci. Rep., 2019, 9(1), 1–9.

  • Wang, R., Liu, S., Shangguan, D., Radić, V. and Zhang, Y., Spatial heterogeneity in glacier mass-balance sensitivity across high mountain Asia. Water, 2019, 11(4), 776.

  • Negi, H. S., Kumar, A., Kanda, N., Thakur, N. K. and Singh, K. K., Status of glaciers and climate change of East Karakoram in early twenty-first century. Sci. Total Environ., 2021, 753, 141914.

  • Brun, F., Wagnon, P., Berthier, E., Jomelli, V., Maharjan, S. B., Shrestha, F. and Kraaijenbrink, P. D. A., Heterogeneous influence of glacier morphology on the mass balance variability in High Mountain Asia. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf., 2019, 124(6), 1331–1345.

  • Singh, G., Nela, B. R., Bandyopadhyay, D., Mohanty, S. and Kulkarni, A. V., Discovering anomalous dynamics and disintegrating behaviour in glaciers of Chandra-Bhaga sub-basins, part of Western Himalaya using DInSAR. Remote Sensing Environ., 2020, 246; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111885.

  • Singh, G., Bandyopadhyay, D., Nela, B. R., Mohanty, S., Malik, R. and Kulkarni, A. V., Anomalous glacier thinning due to climate feedback mechanism in the Himalaya and evidences in other mountain ranges. Remote Sensing Appl.: Soc. Environ., 2021, 22; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100512.

  • Huss, M. and Hock, R., Global-scale hydrological response to future glacier mass loss. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8(2), 135–140.

  • Immerzeel, W. W. et al., Importance and vulnerability of the world’s water towers. Nature, 2020, 577(7790), 364–369.

  • Negi, H. S., Kanda, N., Shekhar, M. S. and Ganju, A., Recent wintertime climatic variability over the North West Himalayan cryosphere. Curr. Sci., 2018, 114(4), 760–770.

  • Tawde, S. A., Kulkarni, A. V. and Bala, G., Estimation of glacier mass balance on a basin scale: an approach based on satellite-derived snowlines and a temperature index model. Curr. Sci., 2016, 111(12), 1977–1989.

  • Tawde, S. A., Kulkarni, A. V. and Bala, G., An estimate of glacier mass balance for the Chandra basin, Western Himalaya, for the period 1984–2012. Ann. Glaciol., 2017, 58(75pt2), 99–109.

  • Marzeion, B., Jarosch, A. H. and Hofer, M., Past and future sea-level change from the surface mass balance of glaciers. Cryosphere, 2012, 6(6), 1295–1322.

  • Kulkarni, A., Prasad, V., Shirsat, T., Chaturvedi, R. K. and Bahuguna, I. M., Impact of climate change on the glaciers of Spiti River basin, Himachal Pradesh, India. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2021, 49(8), 1951–1963.

  • Prasad, V. et al., Large losses in glacier area and water availability by the end of twenty-first century under high emission scenario, Satluj basin, Himalaya. Curr. Sci., 2019, 116(10), 1721–1730.

  • Nuimura, T. et al., The GAMDAM glacier inventory: a quality-controlled inventory of Asian glaciers. Cryosphere, 2015, 9(3), 849–864.

  • RGI Consortium, Randolph glacier inventory – a dataset of global glacier outlines, version 6. Technical report, National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 2017.

  • Indus water treaty. 1960; https://mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents. htm?dtl/6439/Indus (accessed on 26 September 2022).

  • Bolch, T. et al., The state and fate of Himalayan glaciers. Science, 2012, 336(6079), 310–314.

  • Archer, D. R. and Fowler, H. J., Spatial and temporal variations in precipitation in the Upper Indus basin, global teleconnections and hydrological implications. Hydrol. Earth Sys. Sci., 2004, 8(1), 47–61.

  • Dahri, Z. H., Ludwig, F., Moors, E., Ahmad, B., Khan, A. and Kabat, P., An appraisal of precipitation distribution in the high-altitude catchments of the Indus basin. Sci. Total Environ., 2016, 548, 289–306.

  • Hewitt, K., Glacier change, concentration, and elevation effects in the Karakoram Himalaya, Upper Indus basin. Mt. Res. Dev., 2011, 31(3), 188–200.

  • Shabeh ul Hasson, Pascale, S., Lucarini, V. and Böhner, J., Seasonal cycle of precipitation over major river basins in South and South-east Asia: a review of the CMIP5 climate models data for present climate and future climate projections. Atmos. Res., 2016, 180, 42–63.

  • Bookhagen, B. and Burbank, D. W., Topography, relief, and TRMM-derived rainfall variations along the Himalaya. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2006, 33(8).

  • Pareta, K. and Pareta, U., Climate change impact on land and natural resource in Chamba tehsil of Himachal Pradesh State, India. Int. J. Sci. Technol., 2014, 2(4), 38.

  • Krishnan, R., Sanjay, J., Gnanaseelan, C., Mujumdar, M., Kulkarni, A. and Chakraborty, S., Assessment of Climate Change over the Indian Region: A Report of the Ministry of Earth Sciences (MOES), Government of India, Springer Nature, 2020.

  • Frey, H. et al., Estimating the volume of glaciers in the Himalayan–Karakoram region using different methods. Cryosphere, 2014, 8(6), 2313–2333.

  • Chen, J. and Ohmura, A., Estimation of alpine glacier water resources and their change since the 1870s. Hydrology in Mountainous Regions. I-Hydrological Measurements; the Water cycle. In Proceedings of Two Lausanne Symposia, IAHS Publ. No. 193, August 1990, pp. 127–135.

  • Bahr, D. B., Meier, M. F. and Peckham, S. D., The physical basis of glacier volume–area scaling. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 1997, 102(B9), 20355–20362.

  • Chaohai, L., Sharmal, C. K., Mayor-Mora, R., Xing, H., Sanbao, W. and Shengteng, Z., Report on first expedition to glaciers and glacier lakes in the Pumqu (Arun) and Poiqu (Bhote-Sun Kosi) River basins, Xizang (Tibet), China. Sino-Nepalese investigation of glacier lake outburst floods in the Himalayas. Technical report, Lanzhou Institute of Glaciology and Geocryology, China, Water and Energy Commission Authority, Nepal Electrical Authority, 1988.

  • Groos, A. R., Mayer, C., Smiraglia, C., Diolaiuti, G. and Lambrecht, A., A first attempt to model region-wide glacier surface mass balances in the Karakoram: findings and future challenges. Geogr. Fis. e Din. Quat., 2017, 40(2), 10.4461/GFDQ2017.40.10.

  • Hersbach, H. et al., ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1959 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS), 2018.

  • Bolch, T., Past and future glacier changes in the Indus River basin. Indus River Basin, Elsevier Inc., USA, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812782-7.00004-7.

  • Patel, A., Goswami, A., Dharpure, J. K., Meloth, T., Sharma, P., Kulkarni, A. V. and Oulkar, S., Estimation of mass and energy balance of glaciers using a distributed energy balance model over the Chandra River Basin (Western Himalaya). Hydrol. Proc., 2021, 35(2), e14058.

  • Gardelle, J., Berthier, E., Arnaud, Y. and Kääb, A., Region-wide glacier mass balances over the Pamir–Karakoram–Himalaya during 1999–2011. Cryosphere, 2013, 7(4), 1263–1286.

  • Garg, S., Shukla, A., Garg, P. K., Yousuf, B., Shukla, U. K. and Lotus, S., Revisiting the 24 year (1994–2018) record of glacier mass budget in the Suru sub-basin, Western Himalaya: overall response and controlling factors. Sci. Total Environ., 2021, 800, 149533.

  • Li, L. et al., Twenty-first-century glacio-hydrological changes in the Himalayan headwater Beas River basin. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2019, 23(3), 1483–1503.

  • Azam, M. F., Wagnon, P., Berthier, E., Vincent, C., Fujita, K. and Kargel, J. S., Review of the status and mass changes of Himalayan–Karakoram glaciers. J. Glaciol., 2018, 64(243), 61–74.

  • Zhou, Y., Li, Z. and Li, J., Slight glacier mass loss in the karakoram region during the 1970s to 2000 revealed by KH-9 images and SRTM DEM. J. Glaciol., 2017, 63(238), 331–342.


Abstract Views: 210

PDF Views: 137




  • Differential Loss of Glacier Stored Water in the Indus River Basin

Abstract Views: 210  |  PDF Views: 137

Authors

Ashutosh Kulkarni
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, Goa Campus, Goa 403 726, India
Veena Prasad
DST Centre for Excellence in Climate Change, Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
A. R. Arya
DST Centre for Excellence in Climate Change, Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
Rajiv K. Chaturvedi
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, Goa Campus, Goa 403 726, India
Sushil K. Singh
Space Applications Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Ahmedabad 380 015, India
Sandip Oza
Space Applications Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Ahmedabad 380 015, India

Abstract


In this study, we assessed the glacier stored water (1,620 ± 340 Gt) using a combination of ice dynamics modelling and volume–area scaling method and estimated glacier mass loss (6.4%) from 2001 to 2013 for the Indus River basin. Results indicate that the impact of climate change is not uniform across the basin, especially the stark difference between the Western Himalayan region where the glaciers are losing mass at the rate of –0.56 ± 0.27 m.w.e. per annum and the Upper Indus where the loss is at –0.18 ± 0.11 m.w.e. per annum.

Keywords


Climate Change, Glacier Stored Water, Improved Accumulation Area Ratio, Mass Balance, River Basin.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv124%2Fi4%2F478-484