Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Climate Change Impacts on Crop–Weed Interaction and Eerbicide efficacy


Affiliations
1 ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur 482 004, India
2 ICAR-Central Tobacco Research Institute, Rajahmundry 533 105, India
 

Weeds are likely to show more resilience and adaptation to rising carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration and temperature than crops because of their diverse gene pool and greater physiological plasticity. In agroecosystems, C3 and C4 plants exhibit varied responses to elevated CO2 (eCO2) and temperature (eTem), which can impact the crop–weed competition and efficacy of herbicides. Most C3 plants respond positively to eCO2 by increasing their photosynthetic rate and biomass production. Weeds compete with crops for nutrients, water and light, and considerably reduce yield and quality of the produce. Hence more attention is needed on crop–weed interaction and management under changing climate to ensure sustainable agricultural production. This study emphasizes on the impacts of climate change on crop–weed interaction, herbicide efficacy and weed flora shift, and also highlights the research gaps for further studies.

Keywords

Carbon Dioxide Concentration, Climate Change, Crop–Weed Interaction, Elevated Temperature, Herbicide Efficacy, Weed Flora Shif.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Patterson, D. T., Weeds in a changing climate. Weed Sci., 1995, 43(4), 685–700.

  • https://www.co2.earth/daily-co2 (accessed on 6 November 2022).

  • Schellnhuber, H. J., Global warming: stop worrying, start panicking? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2008, 105(38), 14239–14240.

  • IPCC, Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007, p. 986.

  • Masson-Delmotte, T. W. V. et al., Global warming of 1.5°C. In An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018, pp. 43–50.

  • Valerio, M., Tomecek, M., Lovelli, S. and Ziska, L. Assessing the impact of increasing carbon dioxide and temperature on crop–weed interactions for tomato and a C3 and C4 weed species. Eur. J. Agron., 2013, 50, 60–65.

  • Miri, H. R., Rastegar, A. and Bagheri, A. R., The impact of elevated CO2 on growth and competitiveness of C3 and C4 crops and weeds. Eur. J. Exp. Biol., 2012, 2, 1144–1150.

  • Jaggard, K. W., Qi, A. and Ober, E. S., Possible changes to arable crop yields by 2050. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B, 2010, 365, 2835–2851.

  • Prasad, P. V., Allen, L. H. and Boote, K. J., Crop responses to elevated carbon dioxide and interaction with temperature: grain legumes. J. Crop Improv., 2005, 13, 113.

  • Hartfield, J. L. et al., Climate impacts on agriculture: implications for crop production. Agron. J., 2011, 103, 351–370.

  • Mahajan, G., Singh, S. and Chauhan, B. S., Impact of climate change on weeds in the rice–wheat cropping system. Curr. Sci., 2012, 102, 1254–1255.

  • Peters, K., Breitsameter, L. and Gerowitt, B., Impact of climate change on weeds in agriculture: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 2014, 34, 707–721.

  • Korres, N. E. et al., Cultivars to face climate change effects on crops and weeds: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 2016, 36, 1–22.

  • Johnson, B. C. and Young, B. G., Influence of temperature and relative humidity on the foliar activity of mesotrione. Weed Sci., 2002, 50, 157–161.

  • Ziska, L. H. and Bunce, J. A., Plant responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. Plant Growth Climate Change, 2006, 10, 17–47.

  • Bazzaz, F. A. and Carlson, R. W., The response of the plants to elevated CO2. I. Competition among an assemblage of annuals at different levels of soil moisture. Oecologia, 1984, 62, 196–198.

  • Patterson, D. T., Westbrook, J. K. and Joyce, R. J. C., Weeds, insects and diseases. Clim. Change, 1999, 47, 711–727.

  • Ziska, L. H. and Goins, E. W., Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide and weed populations in glyphosate treated soybean. Crop Sci., 2006, 46, 1354–1359.

  • Ziska, L. H. and Dukes, J. S., Weed Biology and Climate Change, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Ames, IA, USA, 2011, pp. 68–205.

  • Mohamed, K. I., Papes, M., Williams, R., Benz, B. W. and Peterson, T. A., Global invasive potential of 10 parasitic witchweeds and related Orobanchaceae. Ambio, 2006, 35, 281–288.

  • Kimbal, B. A. and Idso, S. B., Increasing atmospheric CO2: effects on crop yield, water use and climate. Agric. Water Manage., 1983, 7, 55–72.

  • Naidu, V. S. G. R., Climate change, crop–weed balance and the future of weed management. Indian J. Weed Sci., 2015, 47, 288–295.

  • ICAR-DWR, Annual Report, ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research (DWR), Jabalpur, India, 2008–09, pp. 10–11.

  • ICAR-DWR, Annual Report, ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, India, 2013–14, pp. 39–46.

  • ICAR-DWR, Annual Report, ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, India, 2020, pp. 33–37.

  • ICAR-DWR, Annual Report, ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, India, 2010–11, pp. 8–10.

  • ICAR-DWR, Annual Report, ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, India, 2009–10, pp. 6–7.

  • ICAR-DWR, Annual Report, ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, India, 2016–17, pp. 16–20.

  • O’Donnell, C. C. and Adkins, S. W., Wild oat and climate change: the effect of CO2 concentration, temperature, and water deficit on the growth and development of wild oat in monoculture. Weed Sci., 2001, 49, 694–702.

  • Ziska, L. H., Faulkner, S. S. and Lydon, J., Changes in biomass and root : shoot ratio of field-grown Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), a noxious, invasive weed, with elevated CO2. Weed Sci., 2004, 52, 584–588.

  • Ziska, L. H., Observed changes in soybean growth and seed yield from Abutilon theophrasti competition as a function of carbon dioxide concentration. Weed Res., 2013, 53, 140–145.

  • Zelikova, T. J., Hufbauer, R. A., Reed, S. L., Wertin, T. M. and Belnap, J., Eco-evolutionary responses of Bromus tectorum to climate change: implications for biological invasions. Ecol. Evol., 2013, 3, 1374–1387.

  • McDonald, A., Riha, S., DiTommaso, A. and DeGaetano, A., Climate change and the geography of weed damage: analysis of US maize systems suggests the potential for significant range transformations. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2009, 130, 131–140.

  • Valerio, M., Tomecek, M., Lovelli, S. and Ziska, L., Quantifying the effect of drought on carbon dioxide-induced changes in competition between a C3 crop (tomato) and a C4 weed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Res., 2011, 51, 591–600.

  • Satrapova, J., Hyvonen, T., Venclova, V. and Soukup, J., Growth and reproductive characteristics of C4 weeds under climatic conditions of the Czech Republic. Plant Soil Environ., 2013, 59, 309–315.

  • Zheng, Q. et al., Elevated CO2 effects on nutrient competition between a C3 crop (Oryza sativa L.) and a C4 weed (Echinochloa crus-galli L.) nutrient cycling. Agroecosystems, 2011, 89, 93–104.

  • Rodenburg, J., Meinke, H. and Johnson, D. E., Challenges for weed management in African rice systems in a changing climate. J. Agric. Sci., 2011, 149, 427–435.

  • ICAR-DWR, Annual Report, ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, India, 2014–15, pp. 27–31.

  • Yin, X. and Struik, P. C., Applying modelling experiences from the past to shape crop. New Phytol., 2008, 179, 629–642.

  • Bazzaz, F. A., The response of natural ecosystems to the rising global CO2 levels. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 1990, 21, 167–196.

  • Coleman, J. S. and Bazzaz, F. A., Effects of CO2 and temperature on growth and resource use of co-occurring C3 and C4 annuals. Ecology, 1992, 73, 1244–1259.

  • Baker, J. T., Allen Jr, L. H., Boote, K. J., Jones, P. and Jones, J. W., Response of soybean to air temperature and carbon dioxide concentration. Crop Sci., 1989, 29, 98–105.

  • Sionit, N., Strain, B. R. and Flint, E. P., Interactions of temperature and CO2 enrichment on soybean: growth and dry matter partitioning. Can. J. Plant Sci., 1987, 67, 59–67.

  • Tremmel, D. C. and Patterson, D. T., Response of soybean and five weeds to CO2 enrichment under two temperature regimes. Can. J. Plant Sci., 1993, 73, 1249–1260.

  • Alberto, A. M. P., Ziska, L. H., Cervancia, C. R. and Manalo, P. A., The influence of increasing carbon dioxide and temperature on competitive interactions between a C3 crop rice (Oryza sativa) and a C4 weed (Echinochloa glabrescens). Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 1996, 23, 795–802.

  • ICAR-DWR, Annual Report, ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, India, 2017–18, pp. 26–30.

  • ICAR-DWR, Annual Report, ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, India, 2018–19, pp. 38–40.

  • Kondo, M., Pablico, P. P., Aragones. D. V. and Agbisit, R., Genotypic variations in carbon isotope discrimination, transpiration efficiency, and biomass production in rice as affected by soil water conditions and N. Plant Soil, 2004, 267, 165–177.

  • Giannini, A., Biasutti, M., Held, I. M. and Sobel, A. H., A global perspective on African climate. Climate Change, 2008, 90, 359–383.

  • Peters, K. and Gerowitt, B., Important maize weeds profit in growth and reproduction from climate change conditions represented by higher temperatures and reduced humidity. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual., 2014, 87, 234–242.

  • Rodenburg, J., Riches, C. R. and Kayeke, J. M., Addressing current and future problems of parasitic weeds in rice. Crop Prot., 2010, 29, 210–221.

  • Elmore, C. D. and Paul, R. N., Composite list of C4 weeds. Weed Sci., 1983, 31, 686–692.

  • Naidu, V. S. G. R. and Varshney, J. G., Interactive effect of elevated CO2, drought and weed competition on carbon isotope discrimination in wheat. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2011, 81, 1026–1029.

  • Ziska, L. H., Tomecek, M. B. and Gealy, D. R., Competitive interactions between cultivated and red rice as a function of recent and projected increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Agron. J., 2010, 102, 118–123.

  • Treharne, K., The implications of the ‘greenhouse effect’ for fertilizers and agrochemicals. In The Greenhouse Effect and UK Agriculture (ed. Benner, R. D.), Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London, UK, 1989, pp. 67–78.

  • Ziska, L. H., The impact of elevated CO2 on yield loss from a C3 and C4 weed in field-grown soybean. Global Change Biol., 2000, 6(8), 899–905.

  • ICAR-DWR, Annual Report, ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, India, 2012–13, pp. 27–33.

  • Bunce, J. A., Differential sensitivity to humidity of daily photosynthesis in the field in C3 and C4 species. Oecologia, 1983, 54, 233–235.

  • Ziska, L. H. and Bunce, J. A., Influence of increasing carbon dioxide concentration on the photosynthetic and growth stimulation of selected C4 crops and weeds. Photosynth. Res., 1997, 54, 199–208.

  • Nelson, T. and Langdale, J. A., Patterns of leaf development in C4 plants. Plant Cell, 1989, 1, 3–13.

  • Dekker, J., Evolutionary biology of the foxtail (Setaria) speciesgroup. In Weed Biology and Management, 2004, pp. 65–113.

  • ICAR-DWR, Annual Report, ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, India, 2015–16, pp. 22–27.

  • Patterson, D. T. and Highsmith, M. T., Competition of spurred anoda (Anoda cristata) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) during simulated drought and recovery. Weed Sci., 1989, 37(5), 658–664.

  • Mortensen, D. A. and Coble, H. D., The influence of soil water content on common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci., 1989, 37, 76–83.

  • Donald, W. W. and Khan, M., Yield loss assessment for spring wheat (Triticuma estivum) infested with Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci., 1992, 40, 590–598.

  • Chauhan, B. S. and Abugho, S. B., Effect of water stress on the growth and development of Amaranthus spinosus, L. chinensis, and rice. Am. J. Plant Sci., 2013, 4, 989–998.

  • Archambault, D. J., Li, X., Robinson, D., O’Donovan, J. T. and Klein, K. K., The effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on herbicide efficacy and weed/crop competition. Report prepared for the Prairie Adaptation Research Collaborative, 2001, 29.

  • Ziska, L. H. and Teasdale, J. R., Sustained growth and increased tolerance to glyphosate observed in a C3 perennial weed, quackgrass (Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski), grown at elevated carbon dioxide. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 2000, 2, 159–164.

  • Smith, C., Van Klinken, R. D., Seabrook, L. and McAlpine, C., Estimating the influence of land management change on weed invasion potential using expert knowledge. Divers. Distrib., 2011, 1, 1–14.

  • Manea, A., Leishman, M. R. and Downey, P. O., Exotic C4 grasses have increased tolerance to glyphosate under elevated carbon dioxide. Weed Sci., 2011, 59, 28–36.

  • Ainsworth, E. A. and Long, S. P., What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol., 2005, 165, 351–372.

  • Kudsk, P. and Kristensen, J. L., Effect of environmental factors on herbicide performance. In Proceedings of the First International Weed Control Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 1992, vol. VIV, pp. 173–186.

  • Beestman, G. B. and Deming, J. M., Dissipation of acetanilide herbicides from soils. Agron. J., 1974, 66, 308–311.

  • Ritter, R. L. and Coble, H. D., Influence of temperature and relative humidity on the activity of acifluorfen. Weed Sci., 1981, 29, 480–485.

  • Mcdowell, R. W., Condron, L. M., Main, B. E. and Dastgheib, F., Dissipation of imazapyr, flumetsulam and thifensulfuron in soil. Weed Res., 1997, 37, 381–389.

  • Sharma, S. D. and Singh, M., Environmental factors affecting absorption and bio-efficacy of glyphosate in Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum). Crop Prot., 2001, 20, 511–516.

  • Mahan, J. R., Dotray, P. A. and Light, G. G., Thermal dependence of enzyme function and inhibition; implications for herbicide efficacy and tolerance. Physiol. Plant., 2004, 20, 187–195.

  • Kumaratilake, A. R. and Preston, C., Low temperature reduces glufosinate activity and translocation in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). Weed Sci., 2005, 53, 10–16.

  • ICAR-DWR, Annual Report, ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, India, 2019, pp. 41–45.

  • Singh, R. P., Singh, R. K. and Singh, M. K., Impact of climate and carbon dioxide change on weeds and their management – a review. Indian J. Weed Sci., 2011, 43, 1–11.

  • Froud-Williams, R. J., Weeds and climate change: implications for their ecology and control. Asp. Appl. Biol., 1996, 45, 187–196.

  • Phillips, O. L. et al., Increasing dominance of large lianas in Amazonian forests. Nature, 2002, 418, 770–774.

  • Boese, S. R., Wolfe, D. W. and Melkonian, J. J., Elevated CO2 mitigates chilling-induced water stress and photosynthetic reduction during chilling. Plant Cell Environ., 1997, 20, 625–632.

  • Naidu, V. S. G. R., Invasive potential of C3–C4 intermediate Parthenium hysterophorus under elevated CO2. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2013, 83, 176–179.

  • Holm, L. G., Doll, J., Holm, E., Pancho, J. and Herverger, J., Worlds Weeds: Natural Histories and Distribution, John Wiley, New York, USA, 1997, p. 1129.

  • Matloob, A., Khaliq, A., Tanveer, A., Husssain, S., Aslam, F. and Chauhan, B. S., Weed dynamics in dry direct-seeded fine rice as influenced by tillage system, sowing time and weed competition duration. Crop Prot., 2015, 71, 25–38.


Abstract Views: 156

PDF Views: 92




  • Climate Change Impacts on Crop–Weed Interaction and Eerbicide efficacy

Abstract Views: 156  |  PDF Views: 92

Authors

D. Sreekanth
ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur 482 004, India
D. V. Pawar
ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur 482 004, India
J. S. Mishra
ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur 482 004, India
V. S. G. R. Naidu
ICAR-Central Tobacco Research Institute, Rajahmundry 533 105, India

Abstract


Weeds are likely to show more resilience and adaptation to rising carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration and temperature than crops because of their diverse gene pool and greater physiological plasticity. In agroecosystems, C3 and C4 plants exhibit varied responses to elevated CO2 (eCO2) and temperature (eTem), which can impact the crop–weed competition and efficacy of herbicides. Most C3 plants respond positively to eCO2 by increasing their photosynthetic rate and biomass production. Weeds compete with crops for nutrients, water and light, and considerably reduce yield and quality of the produce. Hence more attention is needed on crop–weed interaction and management under changing climate to ensure sustainable agricultural production. This study emphasizes on the impacts of climate change on crop–weed interaction, herbicide efficacy and weed flora shift, and also highlights the research gaps for further studies.

Keywords


Carbon Dioxide Concentration, Climate Change, Crop–Weed Interaction, Elevated Temperature, Herbicide Efficacy, Weed Flora Shif.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv124%2Fi6%2F686-692