Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Debunking the Narrative of India as a Large Greenhouse Gas Emitter


Affiliations
1 Formerly Scientist, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Jorbagh Road, New Delhi 110 003, India
 

India is frequently portrayed as the fourth largest greenhouse gas (GHG) emitter globally, based on the current annual emissions of sovereign nation-states. Through a comprehensive review and assessment, this article argues that other metrics of country-wise emissions provide a more holistic and unbiased view. The article argues that ranking per se by any metric is of minor value unless also placed along the actual quantities. India’s cumulative emissions (excluding LULUCF, 1850–2019) amount to only 4.31% of the global total, well behind the three leading emitters, the United States (22.46%), the European Union (16.06%) and China (13.45%). Therefore, in terms of annual emissions, the story of India as the fourth largest emitter is very mistaken, as the gap between us and the third is substantial. The article argues that national emissions must be judged by equity in mitigation and in the light of climate action being undertaken. On both grounds, India, relative to its responsibility and what equity demands, is doing far more than her fair share.

Keywords

Climate Change, GHG Emission, NDC Targets.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Stocker, T. F. et al. (eds), IPCC, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013, p. 1535.
  • UNEP, Emission GAP Report, United Nations Environment Programme, 2018; https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2018.
  • UNFCCC, Paper No. 1: Brazil; proposed elements of a protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. No. UNFCCC/AGBM/1997/MISC.1/Add.3 GE.97, 1997.
  • Eckstein, D., Kunzel, V., Schaefer, L. and Winges, M., Global Climate Risk Index 2020, Germanwatch e.V., 2020.
  • MoEFCC, India: Third Biennial Update Report to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, 2021.
  • England, M., Sen Gupta, A. and Pitman, A., Constraining future greenhouse gas emissions by a cumulative target. PNAS Commentary, 2009, 106, 16539–16540.
  • Kanitkar, T. and Jayaraman, T., Equity in long term mitigation. Climate Change and India, Oxford University Press, 2019.
  • Kanitkar, T., Jayaraman, T., D’Souza, M. and Purkayastha, P., Carbon budgets for climate change mitigation: a GAMS-based emissions model. Curr. Sci., 2013, 104(9), 1200.
  • Kanitkar, T., Jayaraman, T., D’Souza, M., Purkayastha, P., Raghunandan, D. and Talwar, R., How much ‘carbon space’ do we have? Physical constraints on India’s climate policy and its implications’. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2009, XLIV(41).
  • Rogelj, J., Forster, P. M., Kriegler, E., Smith, C. J. and Séférian, R., Estimating and tracking the remaining carbon budget for stringent climate targets. Nature, 2019, 571(7765), 335–342.
  • Kanitkar, T. and Songola, H., A methodology to correlate short-term regional climate action and long-term global temperature goals. Curr. Sci., 2022, 122(6), 689–698.
  • Van den Berg, N. J., Van Soest, H. L., Hof, A. F. et al., Implications of various effort-sharing approaches for national carbon budgets and emission pathways. Climatic Change, 2020, 162, 1805–1822.
  • Ritchie, H., Roser, M. and Rosado, P., CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions. Published online at OurWorldInData.org, 2020; Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions (Online Resource).
  • Meinshausen, M. et al., National post-2020 greenhouse gas targets and diversity-aware leadership, Nat. Climate Change, 2015, 5, 1098–1106.
  • CAT, India, Climate Action Tracker, 2017; http://climateactiontracker.org/countries/india.html.
  • Pont, Y. R. du, Jeffery, M. L., Gütschow, J., Christoff, P. and Meinshausen, M., National contributions for decarbonizing the world economy in line with the G7 agreement. Environ. Res. Lett., 2016, 11.
  • Gütschow, J., Günther, A., Jeffery, L. and Gieseke, R., The PRIMAP-hist national historical emissions time series v2.2 (1850–2018). Zenodo, 2021; doi:10.5281/zenodo.4479172.
  • IPCC, Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, 2018.
  • Parikh, J. and Painuly. J. P., Population, consumption patterns and climate change: a socioeconomic perspective from the South. R. Swedish Acad. Sci., 1994, 23, 434–437.
  • MoEFCC, Samanvay: Harmonizing traditions and modernity for sustainable low-carbon economic growth, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, New Delhi, 2017, p. 56.
  • Matthews, D., Solomon, S. and Pierrehumbert, R., Cumulative carbon as a policy framework for achieving climate stabilization. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A., 2012, 370, 4365–4379.
  • Olivier, J. and Peters, J., Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions, 2018 Report, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2018.
  • Crippa, M. et al., Fossil CO2 and GHG emissions of all world countries – 2019 Report.
  • UNFCCC, Compilation and synthesis of fourth biennial reports of Parties included in Annex I to the Convention, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2020.
  • Gupta, H., Rashmi, R. R. and Bhatt, J. R., Estimating greenhouse gas emissions does production-based methodology reflect the global economic reality? Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2018, 43.
  • MoEFCC, India’s Second Biennial Update Report to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Government of India, 2018.
  • IPCC, Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, figure SPM.2b, 2022; doi:10.1017/97810091579-26.001.

Abstract Views: 201

PDF Views: 95




  • Debunking the Narrative of India as a Large Greenhouse Gas Emitter

Abstract Views: 201  |  PDF Views: 95

Authors

J. R. Bhatt
Formerly Scientist, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Jorbagh Road, New Delhi 110 003, India

Abstract


India is frequently portrayed as the fourth largest greenhouse gas (GHG) emitter globally, based on the current annual emissions of sovereign nation-states. Through a comprehensive review and assessment, this article argues that other metrics of country-wise emissions provide a more holistic and unbiased view. The article argues that ranking per se by any metric is of minor value unless also placed along the actual quantities. India’s cumulative emissions (excluding LULUCF, 1850–2019) amount to only 4.31% of the global total, well behind the three leading emitters, the United States (22.46%), the European Union (16.06%) and China (13.45%). Therefore, in terms of annual emissions, the story of India as the fourth largest emitter is very mistaken, as the gap between us and the third is substantial. The article argues that national emissions must be judged by equity in mitigation and in the light of climate action being undertaken. On both grounds, India, relative to its responsibility and what equity demands, is doing far more than her fair share.

Keywords


Climate Change, GHG Emission, NDC Targets.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv124%2Fi12%2F1378-1383