Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Approximate Natural Period Expression for Reinforced Concrete Tall Buildings in India


Affiliations
1 Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500 032, India
2 CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, India
 

Many tall buildings are being constructed in different Indian cities to cater to the demand generated by the large number of people migrating from rural areas to urban centres. The safety of such tall buildings is ensured by designing them for dynamic loads, viz. wind and earthquake. To withstand these loads, computation of the natural period becomes essential. The current Indian seismic code IS 1893 (2016) has outlined a few empirical expressions based on different structural systems to compute the natural period. These expressions have been developed using data obtained from experiments performed on low to midrise buildings. Thus, verifying their applicability for tall structures before using them is important. To achieve this, in the present study ambient vibration testing was done on 28 reinforced concrete (RC) tall buildings in the Indian cities of Hyderabad and Mumbai, whose heights ranged from 50 to 150 m. These tests’ natural periods were compared with existing Indian and international codes. Based on the comparison, a novel empirical expression of RC tall buildings is proposed here.

Keywords

Ambient Vibration, Dynamic Loads, Fundamental Natural Period, Seismic Codes, Tall Building.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • IS 16700, Criteria for structural safety of tall concrete buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi, 2017.

  • IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016, Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures Part 1: General provision and buildings. BIS, New Delhi, 2016.

  • IS 875: 2015, B., Design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures – code of practice Part 3: Wind loads third Revision. BIS, New Delhi, 2015.

  • ATC3-06, Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for building. Applied Technological Council, Palo Alto, California, USA, 1978.

  • Arlekar, J. N. and Murty, C. V. R., Ambient vibration survey of RC-frame buildings having brick masonry infill walls. Indian Concr. J., 2000, 74, 581–586.

  • Velani, P. D. and Ramancharla, P. K., New empirical formula for fundamental period of tall buildings in India by ambient vibration test. In 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago Chile, 2017.

  • CED 38 20094 WC, Draft Indian standard criteria for structural safety of tall concrete buildings (First Revision of IS 16700: 2017). ICS No. 91.080.040, BIS. New Delhi, 2022.

  • Chopra, A. K., Dynamics of Structures, Pearson Education, India, 2007.

  • SEAOC-88, Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Tentative Commentary. Seismological Committee, Structural Engineers Association of California, San Francisco, California, USA, 1988.

  • NEHRP 94, Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC, USA, 1994.

  • IS 1893(Part 1): 2002, Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures Part 1: General provision and buildings (Fifth Revision). BIS, New Delhi, 2002.

  • Crowley, H. and Pinho, R., Revisiting Eurocode 8 formulae for periods of vibration and their employment in linear seismic analysis. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 2009, 39, 223–235.

  • Gullapalli, R. and Ramancharla, P. K., Natural period of buildings constructed on hill slopes. Indian Concr. Inst. J., 2019, 19(4), 1–10.

  • Jain, S. K., Saraf, V. K. and Malhotra, B., Period of RC frame buildings with brick infills. J. Struct. Eng., Madras, 1997, 23(4), 189–196.

  • Velani, P. D. and Ramancharla, P. K., Proposed new empirical expression for natural period of RC tall buildings in India. In Recent Developments in Design and Construction Technologies of Tall Structure, REDCECON, 2016, pp. 76–83.

  • Velani, P. D. and Ramancharla, P. K., Comparing the empirical time period formula given in seismic code of different countries with Indian seismic code IS 1893: 2002. In National Conference on Advances in Civil Engineering and Infrastructure Development, 2014, pp. 153–159.

  • Raj, P. and Dasgupta, K., Estimation of fundamental natural period of RC frame buildings with structural walls. In Advances in Structural Engineering, Springer India, New Delhi, 2015, pp. 2147–2155.

  • Kewate, S. P. and Murudi, M. M., Empirical period–height relationship for reinforced concrete moment resisting buildings in India. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, 481, 012018.

  • Sreerama, A. K., Gundoji, S., Prakke, B. and Pasupuleti, V. D. K., Empirical expression for the fundamental natural period of buildings on slopes. In Emerging Trends in Civil Engineering. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (eds Babu, K., Rao, H. and Amarnath, Y.), Springer, Singapore, 2020, pp. 355–368.

  • Takeuchi, Y., Hikimoto, Y. and Masyuki, W., Multi-variant statistical analysis for the natural periods and damping ratio of actual existing buildings structures. In Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo–Kyoto, Japan, 1988, pp. V349-V–354.

  • Kobayashi, H., Vidal, F., Feriche, D., Samano, T. and Alguacil, G., Evaluation of dynamic behaviour of building structures with micro-tremors for seismic microzonation mapping. In 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, México, 1996.

  • Farsi, M. N. and Bard, P. Y., Estimation of buildings periods and vulnerability in urban area of Grenoble (France). In 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1998.

  • Lee, L.-H., Chang, K.-K. and Chun, Y.-S., Experimental formula for the fundamental period of RC buildings with shear-wall dominant systems. Struct. Desig. Tall Build., 2000, 9, 295–307.

  • Ho, N. and Kawase, H., Evaluation of dynamic property and seismic performance of low- and mid-rise RC buildings based on micro-tremor measurement. In 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 2004.

  • Oliveira, C. S. and Navarro, M., Fundamental periods of vibration of RC buildings in Portugal from in situ experimental and numerical techniques. Bull. Earthq. Eng., 2009, 8(3), 609–642.

  • Kwon, O.-S. and Kim, E. S., Evaluation of building period formulas for seismic design. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 2010, 39, 1569–1583.

  • Michel, C., Guéguen, P., Lestuzzi, P. and Bard, P.-Y., Comparison between seismic vulnerability models and experimental dynamic properties of existing buildings in France. Bull. Earthq. Eng., 2010, 8, 1295–1307.

  • Kang, S.-H., Hong, S.-G., Park, H.-G. and Chung, L., Fundamental period formulas for concrete shear wall buildings. J. Earthq. Eng. Soc. Korea, 2011, 15, 29–38.

  • Pan, T.-C., Goh, K. S. and Megawati, K., Empirical relationships between natural vibration period and height of buildings in Singapore. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 2014, 43, 449–465.

  • Al-Nimry, H., Resheidat, M. and Al-Jamal, M., Ambient vibration testing of low and medium rise infilled RC frame buildings in Jordan. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 2014, 59, 21–29.

  • Salameh, C. et al., Seismic response of Beirut (Lebanon) buildings: instrumental results from ambient vibrations. Bull. Earthq. Eng., 2016, 14, 2705–2730.

  • Lagomarsino, S., Forecast models for damping and vibration periods of buildings. J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodyn., 1993, 48, 221–239.

  • Satake, N., Suda, K.-I., Arakawa, T., Sasaki, A. and Tamura, Y., Damping evaluation using full-scale data of buildings in Japan. J. Struct. Eng., 2003, 129, 470–477.

  • Warnitchai, P., Development of seismic design requirements for buildings in Bangkok against the effects of distant large earthquakes. In 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 2004.

  • Gilles, D. and McClure, G., Measured natural periods of concrete shear wall buildings: insights for the design of Canadian buildings. Can. J. Civil Eng., 2012, 39, 867–877.

  • Ha, T., Shin, S.-H. and Kim, H., Damping and natural period evaluation of tall RC buildings using full-scale data in Korea. Appl. Sci., 2020, 10, 1568.

  • The Math Works, Inc., MATLAB. Computer Software, 2019.

  • Hrovat, M., Baseline fit. MATLAB Central File Exchange, 2022; https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/24916-base-line-fit (accessed on 31 May 2023).

  • Architectural Institute of Korea, Korean building Code – structural. Ministry of Construction and Transportation of Korea, Seoul, South Korea, 2009.

  • SEI, ASCE/SEI 7-16 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures ANSI/ASCE Standard, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2016.

  • NBCC 2020, National building code of Canada. Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 2020.

  • CEN, Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General actions – wind actions. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2004.

  • Hong, L.-L. and Hwang, W.-L., Empirical formula for fundamental vibration periods of reinforced concrete buildings in Taiwan. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 2000, 29, 327–337.

  • Wang, Z., Chen, J. and Shen, J., Multi-factor and multi-level predictive models of building natural period. Eng. Struct., 2021, 242, 112622.

  • Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K., Building period formulas for estimating seismic displacements. Earthq. Spectra, 2000, 16, 533–536.

  • NBCC 2010, National building code of Canada. Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 2010.

  • NBCC 2015, National building code of Canada. Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 2015.


Abstract Views: 293

PDF Views: 140




  • Approximate Natural Period Expression for Reinforced Concrete Tall Buildings in India

Abstract Views: 293  |  PDF Views: 140

Authors

Pulkit Dilip Velani
Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500 032, India
R. Pradeep Kumar
CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, India

Abstract


Many tall buildings are being constructed in different Indian cities to cater to the demand generated by the large number of people migrating from rural areas to urban centres. The safety of such tall buildings is ensured by designing them for dynamic loads, viz. wind and earthquake. To withstand these loads, computation of the natural period becomes essential. The current Indian seismic code IS 1893 (2016) has outlined a few empirical expressions based on different structural systems to compute the natural period. These expressions have been developed using data obtained from experiments performed on low to midrise buildings. Thus, verifying their applicability for tall structures before using them is important. To achieve this, in the present study ambient vibration testing was done on 28 reinforced concrete (RC) tall buildings in the Indian cities of Hyderabad and Mumbai, whose heights ranged from 50 to 150 m. These tests’ natural periods were compared with existing Indian and international codes. Based on the comparison, a novel empirical expression of RC tall buildings is proposed here.

Keywords


Ambient Vibration, Dynamic Loads, Fundamental Natural Period, Seismic Codes, Tall Building.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv124%2Fi12%2F1412-1421