Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Identifying Suitable Digital Elevation Models and Deriving Features for Landslide Assessment in Idukki District, Kerala, India


Affiliations
1 Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli 620 015, India
2 Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Centre, Thiruvananthapuram 695 033, India
 

This study compares the vertical accuracy of different digital elevation models (DEMs), such as Cartosat-I, ASTER-GDEM, SRTM-GL1, ALOS3D30 and FABDEM with a resolution of 30 m, to the toposheet-derived 264 spot heights of Idukki district, Kerala, India, obtained from the Survey of India. We quantitatively assess the vertical accuracy of these DEMs by analysing their accuracy against randomly selected topographic map spot heights. The study also validates the accuracy of the DEMs by evaluating the vertical accuracy separately for different elevation classes representing varying terrain characteristics of the Idukki district. Statistical measures are used to evaluate the performance of the DEMs. The results of the study show that FABDEM exhibits an RMSE of 41.79 m, which is lower than that of other models. The study utilizes FABDEM to derive a set of 12 geomorphological and hydrogeological features, including slope, aspect, elevation, profile curvature, plan curvature, distance to road, relative relief, ruggedness index, drainage density, height above near drainage, wetness index and stream power index. The characteristics of various parameters are analysed. The uniqueness of this study lies in its utilization of geomorphological and hydrogeological features derived from FABDEM that directly impact the susceptibility of landslides in the region. The study identifies that a combination of these dynamic and static parameters, which vary with elevation classes, plays a significant role in determining landslide occurrence in this region.

Keywords

Digital Elevation Models, Geomorphological and Hydrogeological Features, Landslide, Spot Height, Vertical Accuracy.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Daya Sagar, B. S., Digital elevation models: an important source of data for geoscientists. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sensing Mag., 2020, 8(4), 138–142.

  • Coveney, S., Association of elevation error with surface type, vegetation class and data origin in discrete-returns airborne LiDAR. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 2013, 27(3), 467–483.

  • Mesa-Mingorance, J. L. and Ariza-Lopez, F. J., Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models (DEMs): a critical review of practices of the past three decades. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(16), 2630.

  • Mohammed Al Balasmeh, O. I. and Karmaker, T., Accuracy assessment of the digital elevation model, digital terrain model (DTM) from aerial stereo pairs and contour maps for hydrological parameters. Appl. Geomat. Civ. Eng., 2019, 461–470.

  • Mahesh, R., Sarunjith, J. K., Rajakumari, S., Muruganandam, R. and Ramesh, R., Quality assessment of open sourced digital elevation models in southeast coast of India. Egypt. J. Remote Sensing Sci., 2021, 24(3), 745–754.

  • Vaka, D. S., Kumar, V., Rao, Y. S. and Deo, R., Comparison of various DEMs for height accuracy assessment over different terrains of India. In IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Yokohama, Japan, 14 November 2019; doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8898492.

  • Mukherjeea, S., Joshi, P. K., Mukherjeea, S., Ghosh, A., Garg, R. D. and Mukhopadhyay, A., Evaluation of vertical accuracy of open source digital elevation model (DEM). Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 2013, 21, 205–217.

  • Rawat, K. S., Mishra, A. K., Sehgal, V. K., Ahmed, N. and Tripathi, V. K., Comparative evaluation of horizontal accuracy of elevations of selected ground control points from ASTER and SRTM DEM with respect to CARTOSAT-1 DEM: a case study of Shahjahanpur district, Uttar Pradesh, India. Geocarto Int., 2013, 28(5), 439–452.

  • Jain, A. O., Thaker, Chaurasia, P. and Singh, P., Vertical accuracy evaluation of SRTM-GL1, GDEM-V2, AW3D30 and CartoDEM-V3.1 of 30 m resolution with dual frequency GNSS for Lower Tapi Basin, India. Geocarto Int., 2018, 33, 1237–1256.

  • Patel, A., Katiyar, S. K. and Prasa, V., Performances evaluation of different open source DEMs using differential global positioning system (DGPS). Egypt. J. Remote Sensing Space Sci., 2016, 19, 7–16.

  • Mukherjee, S., Accuracy of Cartosat-1 DEM and its derived attribute at multiple scale representation. J. Earth Syst. Sci., 2015, 124(3), 487–495.

  • Rastogi, G. and Agrawal, R., Bias corrections of CartoDEM using ICESat-GLAS data in hilly regions. GISci. Remote Sensing, 2015, 52, 571–585.

  • Thomas, J., Joseph, S., Thrivikramji, K. P. and Arunkumar, K. S., Sensitivity of digital elevation models: the scenario from two tropical mountain river basins of the Western Ghats, India. Geosci. Front., 2014, 5, 893–909.

  • Brocka, J., Schratza, P., Petschkoa, H., Muenchowa, J., Micuc, M. and Brenning, A., The performance of landslide susceptibility models critically depends on the quality of digital elevation models. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk, 2020, 11(1), 1075–1092.

  • Jones, S., Kasthurba, A. K., Bhagyanathan, A. and Binoy, B. V., Landslide susceptibility investigation for Idukki district of Kerala using regression analysis and machine learning. Arab. J. Geosci., 2021, 14, 838.

  • Jennifer, J. and Saravanan, S., Artificial neural network and sensitivity analysis in the landslide susceptibility mapping of Idukki district, India. Geocarto Int., 2021, 37(10), 1–23.

  • Kieran, M. R., Hunt and Menon, A., The 2018 Kerala foods: a climate change perspective. Climate Dyn., 2020, 54, 2433–2446.

  • Rao, B. S., Anil Kumar, G., Gopalakrishna, P. V. S. S. N., Srinivasulu, P. and Raghu Venkataraman, V., Evaluation of EGM 2008 with EGM96 and its utilization in topographical mapping projects. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2021, 40(2), 335–340.

  • Bertin, S., Jaud, M. and Delacourt, C., Assessing DEM quality and minimizing registration error in repeated geomorphic surveys with multi-temporal ground truths of invariant features: application to a long-term dataset of beach topography and nearshore bathymetry. Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 2022, 47, 2950–2971.

  • Krishnan, S., Sajikumar, N. and Sumam, K. S., DEM generation using Cartosat-I stereo data and its comparison with publically available DEM. Proc. Technol., 2016, 24, 295–302.

  • Muralikrishnan, S., Pillai, A., Narender, B., Reddy, S., Raghu Venkataraman, V. and Dadhwal, V. K., Validation of Indian national DEM from Cartosat-1 data. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2013, 41(1), 1–13.

  • Gesch, D., Oimoen, M., Danielson, J. and Meyer, D., Validation of the aster global digital elevation model version 3 over the conterminous United States. Int. Arch. Photogramm., Remote Sensing Spat. Inf. Sci., 2016, XLI-B4, 143–148.

  • Foni, A. and Seal, D., Shuttle radar topography mission: an innovative approach to shuttle orbital control. Acta Astronaut., 2004, 54(8), 565–570.

  • Patel, P. P. and Sarkar, A., Terrain characterization using SRTM data. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2010, 38, 11–24.

  • Marsh, C. B., Harder, P. and Pomeroy, J. W., Validation of FABDEM, a global bare-earth elevation model, against UAV-lidar derived elevation in a complex forested mountain catchment. Environ. Res. Commun., 2023, 5(3), 1–19.

  • Tadono, T., Takaku, J., Tsutsui, K., Oda, F. and Nagai, H., Status of ALOS World 3D (AW3D) global DSM generation. In IEEE International Geoscience Remote Sensing Symposium, Milan, Italy, 2015.

  • Rawat, K. S., Sing, S. K., Singh, M. I. and Garg, B. L., Comparative evaluation of vertical accuracy of elevated points with ground control points from ASTER-DEM and SRTMDEM with respect to CARTOSAT-1DEM. Remote Sensing Appl. Soc. Environ., 2019, 13, 289–297.

  • Cakir, L. and Konakoglu, B., The impact of data normalization on 2D coordinate transformation using GRNN. Geod. Vestn., 2019, 63, 541–553.

  • Nath, R. R., Sharma, M. L., Goswami, A., Sweta, K. and Pareek, N., Landslide susceptibility zonation with special emphasis on tectonic features for occurrence of landslides in Lower Indian Himalaya. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2021, 49(5), 1221–1238.

  • Bopche, L. and Rege, P. P., Feature-based model for landslide susceptibility mapping usinga multi-parametric decision-making technique and the analytic hierarchy process. Sådhanå, 2021, 46, 122.

  • Shirzadi, A., Bui, D. T., Pham, B. T. and Solaimani, K., Shallow landslide susceptibility assessment using a novel hybrid intelligence approach. Environ. Earth Sci., 2017, 76(2), 1–18.

  • Ghosh, T., Bhowmik, S., Jaiswal, P., Ghosh, S. and Kumar, D., Generating substantially complete landslide inventory using multiple data sources: a case study in Northwest Himalayas, India. J. Geol. Soc. India, 2020, 95(1), 45–58.

  • Feby, B., Achu, A. L., Jimnisha, K., Ayisha, V. A. and Reghunath, R., Landslide susceptibility modelling using integrated evidential belief function based logistic regression method: a study from southern Western Ghats, India. Remote Sensing Appl. Soc. Environ., 2020, 20, 1–19.


Abstract Views: 192

PDF Views: 85




  • Identifying Suitable Digital Elevation Models and Deriving Features for Landslide Assessment in Idukki District, Kerala, India

Abstract Views: 192  |  PDF Views: 85

Authors

A. Shameem Ansar
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli 620 015, India
S. Sudha
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli 620 015, India
Suresh Francis
Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Centre, Thiruvananthapuram 695 033, India

Abstract


This study compares the vertical accuracy of different digital elevation models (DEMs), such as Cartosat-I, ASTER-GDEM, SRTM-GL1, ALOS3D30 and FABDEM with a resolution of 30 m, to the toposheet-derived 264 spot heights of Idukki district, Kerala, India, obtained from the Survey of India. We quantitatively assess the vertical accuracy of these DEMs by analysing their accuracy against randomly selected topographic map spot heights. The study also validates the accuracy of the DEMs by evaluating the vertical accuracy separately for different elevation classes representing varying terrain characteristics of the Idukki district. Statistical measures are used to evaluate the performance of the DEMs. The results of the study show that FABDEM exhibits an RMSE of 41.79 m, which is lower than that of other models. The study utilizes FABDEM to derive a set of 12 geomorphological and hydrogeological features, including slope, aspect, elevation, profile curvature, plan curvature, distance to road, relative relief, ruggedness index, drainage density, height above near drainage, wetness index and stream power index. The characteristics of various parameters are analysed. The uniqueness of this study lies in its utilization of geomorphological and hydrogeological features derived from FABDEM that directly impact the susceptibility of landslides in the region. The study identifies that a combination of these dynamic and static parameters, which vary with elevation classes, plays a significant role in determining landslide occurrence in this region.

Keywords


Digital Elevation Models, Geomorphological and Hydrogeological Features, Landslide, Spot Height, Vertical Accuracy.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv125%2Fi6%2F665-677