Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Study on Consumer Awareness, Perception and Willingness to Pay for Biofortified Products in Delhi, India


Affiliations
1 Division of Agricultural Economics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012, India
2 Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012, India
 

Malnutrition, which can perpetuate a cycle of poverty and ill health, will disproportionately impact people. Biofortification is an initiative to ensure improved nutritional outcomes in developing countries, where approaches to food supplements and commercially marketed fortified foods are limited. A primary survey was carried out in and around the National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi, India. A total of 134 respondents from urban and 123 respondents from rural areas were interviewed. The results revealed that the majority of respondents in urban areas (72%) presumed that biofortified products were higher in micronutrients than those in rural areas (49%). The findings reveal that age and gender negatively impact consumer awareness of biofortification, while education, food habits and income exert a positive and significant impact. The policy implications drawn should enable the development of consumer-based food products by creating a niche market and using an appropriate marketing channel to increase consumer acceptance and WTP.

Keywords

Biofortification, Consumer Awareness, Malnutrition, Perception, Willingness to Pay.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • John, P., Tanzania recording steady progress against malnutrition. Online, 2009; http://216.69.164.44/ipp/guardian/2007/10/03/99636.html (accessed on 20 April 2010).

  • WHO, WHO fact sheet on malnutrition, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.

  • Branca, F. and Ferrari, M., Impact of micronutrient deficiencies on growth: the stunting syndrome. Ann. Nutr. Metab., 2002, 46(Suppl. 1), 8–17.

  • Ezzati, M., Vander Hoorn, S., Lopez, A. D., Danaei, G., Rodgers, A., Mathers, C. D. and Murray, C. J., Comparative quantification of mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected risk factors. Global Burden Dis. Risk Factors, 2006, 2, 241–396.

  • Wong, E. B. et al., Causes of death on antiretroviral therapy: a post-mortem study from South Africa. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(10), e47542.

  • UNICEF, Child stunting, hidden hunger and human Capital in South Asia: implications for sustainable development post 2015. The United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund, Kathmandu, Nepal, 2018.

  • World Health Organization, The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2018: building climate resilience for food security and nutrition, Food and Agricultural Organization, 2018.

  • Gibson, R. S., Enhancing the performance of food-based strategies to improve micronutrient status and associated health outcomes in young children from poor-resource households in low-income countries: challenges and solutions. In Improving Diets and Nutrition: Food-based Approaches (eds Thomson, B. and Amoroso, L.), FAO and CABI, Rome, Italy, 2014, pp. 19–31.

  • Qaim, M., Stein, A. J. and Meenakshi, J. V., Economics of biofortification. Agric. Econ., 2007, 37, 119–133.

  • Morris, C. E. and Sands, D. C., The breeder’s dilemma – yield or nutrition? Nature Biotechnol., 2006, 24(9), 1078–1080.

  • Meenakshi, J. V., Banerji, A., Manyong, V., Tomlins, K., Hamukwala, P., Zulu, R. and Mungoma, C., Consumer acceptance of pro-vitamin A orange maize in rural Zambia. HarvestPlus Working Paper No. 4, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, USA, 2010.

  • Allen, L., de Benoist, B., Dary, O. and Hurrell, R., Guidelines on food fortification with micronutrients. World Health Organization, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006, pp. 1–376.

  • Draper, A., Street foods in developing countries: the potential for micronutrient fortification, Opportunities for Micronutrient Interventions (OMNI) Project, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Development Experience Clearinghouse (DEC), Maryland, USA, 1996, pp. 1–74.

  • Meenakshi, J. V. et al., How cost-effective is biofortification in combating micronutrient malnutrition? An ex ante assessment. World Dev., 2010, 38(1), 64–75.

  • Vijayaraghavan, K., Control of micronutrient deficiencies in India: obstacles and strategies. Nutr. Rev., 2002, 60(Suppl. 5), S73–S76.

  • Bouis, H. E., Plant breeding: a new tool for fighting micronutrient malnutrition. J. Nutr., 2002, 132(3), 491S–494S.

  • Bouis, H. E., Economics of enhanced micronutrient density in food staples. Field Crops Res., 1999, 60(1–2), 165–173.

  • Oparinde, A., Birol, E., Murekezi, A., Katsvairo, L., Diressie, M. T., Nkundimana, J. D. A. and Butare, L., Consumer acceptance of biofortified iron beans in rural Rwanda: experimental evidence. Gates Open Res., 2019, 3(367), 367.

  • Combris, P., Pinto, A. S., Fragata, A. and Giraud-Héraud, E., Does taste beat food safety? Evidence from the ‘Pêra Rocha’ case in Portugal. J. Food Prod. Market., 2009, 16(1), 60–78.

  • Oparinde, A., Birol, E., Murekezi, A., Katsvairo, L., Diressie, M., Nkundimana, J. and Butare, L., Consumer acceptance of biofortified iron beans in rural Rwanda: experimental evidence, Harvest Plus Working Papers No. 18, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, 2015.

  • Kajale, D. B. and Becker, T. C., Willingness to pay for golden rice in India: a contingent valuation method analysis. J. Food Prod. Market., 2015, 21(4), 319–336.

  • Haas, J. D., Beard, J. L., Murray-Kolb, L. E., Del Mundo, A. M., Felix, A. and Gregorio, G. B., Iron-biofortified rice improves the iron stores of nonanemic Filipino women. J. Nutr., 2005, 135(12), 2823–2830.

  • Dawe, D. and Unnevehr, L., Crop case study: GMO golden rice in Asia with enhanced vitamin A benefits for consumers. AgBioForum, 2007, 10(3), 154–160.

  • Banerji, A., Birol, E., Karandikar, B. and Rampal, J., Information, branding, certification, and consumer willingness to pay for high-iron pearl millet: evidence from experimental auctions in Maharashtra, India. Food Policy, 2016, 62, 133–141.

  • Johns, T. and Eyzaguirre, P. B., Biofortification, biodiversity and diet: a search for complementary applications against poverty and malnutrition. Food Policy, 2007, 32(1), 1–24.

  • Kale, R. B., Ponnusamy, K., Chakravarty, A. K., Sendhil, R. and Mohammad, A. Assessing resource and infrastructure disparities to strengthen Indian dairy sector. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 2016, 86(6), 720–725.

  • Moon, W., Estimating the effect of health knowledge in the consumption of soy-based foods. In Proceedings of Annual Meeting of American Agricultural Economics Association, Long Beach, California, USA, 2002.

  • Hobbs, J. E., Bailey, D., Dickinson, D. L. and Haghiri, M., Traceability in the Canadian red meat sector: do consumers care? Can. J. Agric. Econ., 2005, 53(1), 47–65.

  • Arnold, G., Sensory Quality in Foods and Beverages: Definition, Measurement and Control, Horwood Limited, FL, USA, 1983, pp. 109–114.

  • Stranieri, S., Baldi, L. and Banterle, A., Do nutrition claims matter to consumers? An empirical analysis considering European requirements. J. Agric. Econ., 2010, 61(1), 15–33.

  • Shepherd, R., Social determinants of food choice. Proc. Nutr. Soc., 1999, 58, 807–812.

  • Birol, E., Asare-Marfo, D., Karandikar, B. and Roy, D., A latent class approach to investigating farmer demand for biofortified staple food crops in developing countries: the case of high-iron pearl millet in Maharashtra, India (Harvest Plus Working Papers No. 7), International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC, USA, 2011.

  • Harris, J. M., The impact of food product characteristics on consumer purchasing behavior: the case of Frankfurters. J. Food Distrib. Res., 1997, 28(1), 92–97.

  • Cardello, A. V., Consumer expectations and their role in food acceptance. In Measurement of Food Preferences, Springer, Boston, MA, USA, 1994, pp. 253–297.

  • Shepherd, R. and Sparks, P., Modelling food choice. In Measurement of Food Preferences (eds Macfie, H. and Thomson, D.), Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 1994, pp. 202–206.

  • Jonas, M. S. and Beckmann, S. C., Functional foods: consumer perceptions in Denmark and England, Manual of Policies and Procedures (MAPPs), Working Paper No. 55, 1998.

  • Furst, T., Connors, M., Bisogni, C. A., Sobal, J. and Falk, L. W., Food choice: a conceptual model of the process. Appetite, 1996, 26, 247–266.

  • Pillay, K., Derera, J., Siwela, M. and Veldman, F. J., Consumer acceptance of yellow, provitamin A-biofortified maize in Kwazulu-Natal. S. Afr. J. Clin. Nutr., 2011, 24(4), 186–191.

  • Adesope, A. A. A., Awoyemi, T. T., Falusi, A. O. and Omonona, B. T., Willingness to pay for safety label on sugar and vegetable oil among households in Southwestern Nigeria. J. Agric. Soc. Res., 2010, 10(1), 155–165.

  • De Steur, H., Market potential of folate biofortified rice in China, Doctoral dissertation, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, 2011.

  • González, C., Johnson, N. and Qaim, M., Consumer acceptance of second‐generation GM foods: the case of biofortified cassava in the northeast of Brazil. J. Agric. Econ., 2009, 60(3), 604–624.

  • Loureiro, M. L. and Hine, S., Discovering niche markets: a comparison of consumer willingness to pay for local (Colorado grown), organic, and GMO-free products. J. Agric. Appl. Econ., 2002, 34(3), 477–487.

  • Bett, H. K., Peters, K. J., Nwankwo, U. M. and Bokelmann, W., Estimating consumer preferences and willingness to pay for the underutilised indigenous chicken products. Food Policy, 2013, 41, 218–225.

  • Lagerkvist, C. J., Berthelsen, T., Sundström, K. and Johansson, H., Country of origin or EU/non-EU labelling of beef? Comparing structural reliability and validity of discrete choice experiments for measurement of consumer preferences for origin and extrinsic quality cues. Food Qual. Prefer., 2014, 34, 50–61.


Abstract Views: 265

PDF Views: 85




  • A Study on Consumer Awareness, Perception and Willingness to Pay for Biofortified Products in Delhi, India

Abstract Views: 265  |  PDF Views: 85

Authors

M. L. Geetha
Division of Agricultural Economics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012, India
P. Venkatesh
Division of Agricultural Economics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012, India
Girish K. Jha
Division of Agricultural Economics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012, India
Dharam Raj Singh
Division of Agricultural Economics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012, India
V. Sangeetha
Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012, India

Abstract


Malnutrition, which can perpetuate a cycle of poverty and ill health, will disproportionately impact people. Biofortification is an initiative to ensure improved nutritional outcomes in developing countries, where approaches to food supplements and commercially marketed fortified foods are limited. A primary survey was carried out in and around the National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi, India. A total of 134 respondents from urban and 123 respondents from rural areas were interviewed. The results revealed that the majority of respondents in urban areas (72%) presumed that biofortified products were higher in micronutrients than those in rural areas (49%). The findings reveal that age and gender negatively impact consumer awareness of biofortification, while education, food habits and income exert a positive and significant impact. The policy implications drawn should enable the development of consumer-based food products by creating a niche market and using an appropriate marketing channel to increase consumer acceptance and WTP.

Keywords


Biofortification, Consumer Awareness, Malnutrition, Perception, Willingness to Pay.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv125%2Fi7%2F728-736