Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Soil Reinforcement Capability of Two Legume Species from Plant Morphological Traits and Mechanical Properties


Affiliations
1 Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
2 University Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus Queretaro, Mexico
 

Vegetation is an essential tool to reinforce soil and improve slope stability. Two legume species, lead tree (Leucaena leucocephala) and copperpod (Peltophorum pterocarpum), were tested in terms of their capacity for soil reinforcement using a modified laboratory shear box. In addition, morphological parameters of the plant and ischolar_main tensile strength were measured, while ischolar_main composition also was analysed. Root system significantly contributed to increase the shear strength and residual strength of soil. The soil-ischolar_main matrix of both species significantly affected the cohesion but not the angle of friction. Overall effects varied with soil depth and plant species. Lead tree showed higher soil shear strength and residual strength compared to copperpod. It also exhibited higher ischolar_main biomass, ischolar_main length, fine ischolar_mains, ischolar_main tensile strength and concentration of cellulosic components in ischolar_main than copperpod, indicating a higher contribution to soil-ischolar_main matrix, soil shear strength and soil reinforcement. A positive correlation (r = 0.99) was observed between ischolar_main biomass and soil shear strength of the species studied. Likewise, ischolar_main cellulosic components and soil shear strength were positively correlated. Overall, lead tree exhibited exceptional ischolar_main profiles and mechanical properties and can be the best suited plant for soil reinforcement.

Keywords

Cellulosic Components, Root Biomass, Soil Reinforcement, Shear Strength, Tensile Strength.
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 348

PDF Views: 137




  • Soil Reinforcement Capability of Two Legume Species from Plant Morphological Traits and Mechanical Properties

Abstract Views: 348  |  PDF Views: 137

Authors

Mohammed Saifuddin
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Normaniza Osman
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
M. Motior Rahman
University Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus Queretaro, Mexico
Amru Nasrulhaq Boyce
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Abstract


Vegetation is an essential tool to reinforce soil and improve slope stability. Two legume species, lead tree (Leucaena leucocephala) and copperpod (Peltophorum pterocarpum), were tested in terms of their capacity for soil reinforcement using a modified laboratory shear box. In addition, morphological parameters of the plant and ischolar_main tensile strength were measured, while ischolar_main composition also was analysed. Root system significantly contributed to increase the shear strength and residual strength of soil. The soil-ischolar_main matrix of both species significantly affected the cohesion but not the angle of friction. Overall effects varied with soil depth and plant species. Lead tree showed higher soil shear strength and residual strength compared to copperpod. It also exhibited higher ischolar_main biomass, ischolar_main length, fine ischolar_mains, ischolar_main tensile strength and concentration of cellulosic components in ischolar_main than copperpod, indicating a higher contribution to soil-ischolar_main matrix, soil shear strength and soil reinforcement. A positive correlation (r = 0.99) was observed between ischolar_main biomass and soil shear strength of the species studied. Likewise, ischolar_main cellulosic components and soil shear strength were positively correlated. Overall, lead tree exhibited exceptional ischolar_main profiles and mechanical properties and can be the best suited plant for soil reinforcement.

Keywords


Cellulosic Components, Root Biomass, Soil Reinforcement, Shear Strength, Tensile Strength.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv108%2Fi7%2F1340-1347