Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Methodology for the Estimation of Groundwater Flux across Simplified Boundary Using GIS and Groundwater Levels


Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, India
 

Accurate estimation of the groundwater budget requires good estimate of flux across the boundary of a region. Different methods and techniques are available to estimate recharge to groundwater however methods for estimation of flux across boundaries are not available. The present article represents a GISbased methodology to estimate the groundwater flow rate and volume of water flux across the boundary. Groundwater level data (pre-monsoon and postmonsoon) are used to derive detailed maps like flow direction, hydraulic gradient and velocity component perpendicular to the boundary. For the study area, the calculated flux through the simplified boundary average 6.63 × 105 m3 for monsoon period, 13.75 × 105 m3 for non-monsoon period and 20.38 × 105 m3 annually. Flux of monsoon period varies from maximum of 11.41 × 105 m3 in 2003 to minimum of 0.83 × 105 m3 in the year 2013 and for annual period it varies from maximum 38.8 × 105 m3 in 2003-04 to minimum -7.94 × 105 m3 in 2012-13.

Keywords

Darcy’s Law, Geographical Information System, Groundwater Flux, Simplified Boundary.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Elbeih, S. F., An overview of integrated remote sensing and GIS for groundwater mapping in Egypt. Ain Shams Eng. J., 2014, 6(1), 1–15.
  • Wada, Y., Beek, L. P. H. V., Kempen, C. M. V., Reckman, J. W. T. M., Vasak, S. and Bierkens, M .F. P., Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2010, 37, doi: 10.1029/2010GL044571
  • Adhikari, R. N., Singh, A. K., Math, S. K. N., Raizada, A., Mishra, P. K. and Reddy, K. K., Augmentation of groundwater recharge and water quality improvement by water harvesting structures in the semi-arid Deccan. Curr. Sci., 2013, 104, 1534– 1542.
  • Kumar, S., Karma, S. K., Yadav, R. K. and Sharma, J. P., Evaluation of sand-based storm water filtration system for groundwater recharge wells. Curr. Sci., 2012, 103, 395–404.
  • CWC, Water and related statistics, Central Water Commission, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, 2013; http://www.cwc.nic.in/.
  • Pethaperumal, S. et al., A novel approach for groundwater budgeting using GIS in a part of Pondicherry region, India. J. Water Resour. Protect., 2010, 2(6), 585–591; doi:10.4236/jwarp.2010.26067.
  • Chenini, I. and Mammou, A. B., Groundwater recharge study in arid region: an approach using GIS techniques and numerical modeling. Comput. Geosci., 2010, 36, 801–817.
  • Yeh, H. F., Lin, H. I., Lee, S. T., Chang, M. H., Hsu, K. C. and Lee, C. H., GIS and SBF for estimating groundwater recharge of a mountainous basin in the Wu River watershed, Taiwan. J. Earth Syst. Sci., 2014, 123(3), 503–516.
  • Salah, H., Geostatistical analysis of groundwater levels in the south Al Jabal Al Akhdar area using GIS. GIS Ostrava, 2009.
  • Batelaan, O., Smedt, F. D. and Triest, L., Regional groundwater discharge: phreatophyte mapping, groundwater modelling and impact analysis of land-use change. J. Hydrol., 2003, 275(1–2), 86–108.
  • Healy, R. W. and Cook, P. G., Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge. Hydrogeol. J., 2002, 10, 91–109.
  • Lee, C. H., Yeh, H. F. and Chen, J. F., Estimation of groundwater recharge using the soil moisture budget method and the base-flow model. Environ. Geol., 2008, 54(8), 1787–1797.
  • Izuka, S. K., Oki, D. S. and Engott, J. A., Simple method for estimating groundwater recharge on tropical islands. J. Hydrol., 2010, 387(1–2), 81–89.
  • Singhal, V. and Goyal, R., Development of conceptual groundwater flow model for Pali Area, India. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2011, 5(12), 1085–1092.
  • Arora, A. N. and Goyal, R., Groundwater model of waterlogged area of Indira Gandhi Nahar Pariyojna, Stage I. ISH J. Hydrol.Eng., 2012, 18(1), 45–53.
  • Singhal, V. and Goyal, R., Groundwater model to predict the impact due to textile units at Pali. Arabian J. Geosci., 2014, 7(12), 5185–5192.
  • Kushwaha, R. K., Pandit, M. K. and Goyal, R., MODFLOW Based groundwater resource evaluation and prediction in Mendha Sub-Basin, NE Rajasthan. J. Geol. Soc. India, 2009, 74, 449–458.
  • Goodchild, M. F., Parks, B. O. and Steyaert, L. T., Environmental Modelling with GIS, Oxford University Press, 1993, 5th edn.
  • Singhal, V. and Goyal, R., GIS based methodology for groundwater flow estimation across the boundary of the study area in groundwater flow modeling. J. Water Res. Protect., 2011, 3, 824– 831.
  • Gundogdu, K. S. and Guney, I., Spatial analyses of groundwater levels using universal kriging. J. Earth Syst. Sci., 2007, 116(1), 49–55.
  • Gogu, R., Carabin, G., Hallet, V., Peters, V. and Dassargues, A., GIS-based hydrogeological databases and groundwater modelling.Hydrogeol. J., 2001, 9(6), 555–569.
  • Jenson, S. K. and Domingue, J. O., Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 1988, 54(11), 1593-1600.
  • Todd, D. K. and Mays, L. W., Groundwater Hydrology, John Wiley & Sons, New Delhi, 2005, 3rd edn.

Abstract Views: 208

PDF Views: 86




  • Methodology for the Estimation of Groundwater Flux across Simplified Boundary Using GIS and Groundwater Levels

Abstract Views: 208  |  PDF Views: 86

Authors

Kuldeep Kushwaha
Department of Civil Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, India
Rohit Goyal
Department of Civil Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, India

Abstract


Accurate estimation of the groundwater budget requires good estimate of flux across the boundary of a region. Different methods and techniques are available to estimate recharge to groundwater however methods for estimation of flux across boundaries are not available. The present article represents a GISbased methodology to estimate the groundwater flow rate and volume of water flux across the boundary. Groundwater level data (pre-monsoon and postmonsoon) are used to derive detailed maps like flow direction, hydraulic gradient and velocity component perpendicular to the boundary. For the study area, the calculated flux through the simplified boundary average 6.63 × 105 m3 for monsoon period, 13.75 × 105 m3 for non-monsoon period and 20.38 × 105 m3 annually. Flux of monsoon period varies from maximum of 11.41 × 105 m3 in 2003 to minimum of 0.83 × 105 m3 in the year 2013 and for annual period it varies from maximum 38.8 × 105 m3 in 2003-04 to minimum -7.94 × 105 m3 in 2012-13.

Keywords


Darcy’s Law, Geographical Information System, Groundwater Flux, Simplified Boundary.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv110%2Fi6%2F1050-1058