The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off


Infill panels are widely used as interior partitions and external walls in buildings, but they are usually treated as non-structural elements and in a lot of cases their stiffness is not included in the reinforced concrete design. While performing the evaluation of existing reinforced concrete buildings, to know the actual behavior of structure, effect of infill need to be incorporated in seismic evaluation. The masonry infill has been modeled as an equivalent diagonal structural element using Main-stone theory. Pushover analysis has been carried out on bare frame and frame with infill. The result shows that infill, if present in all storeys, gives a significant contribution to the energy dissipation capacity. Seismic performance assessments indicate that, the infill frame has the lowest collapse risk and the bare frame is found to be the most vulnerable to earthquake-induced collapse. The diagonal strut has been modeled using E-tabs software and pushover analysis is performed. The example building is analyzed; the effect of masonry infill in seismic evaluation of bare frame and frame with masonry infill is studied. The results obtained from the analysis are compared in terms of strength and stiffness with bare frame.

Keywords

Seismic Performance, Dynamic Loads, Masonry Infill, Pushover Analysis, Main-Stone Theory.
User
Notifications
Font Size