Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Senior High School Students’ Self-Regulated Learning Using Mobile Devices
Subscribe/Renew Journal
The objective of this study is to investigate how senior high school students utilize their mobile devices during self-regulated learning in chemistry, what are their attitudes toward mobile devices as a learning tool in chemistry and determine if there is a significant relationship between the frequency of usage of mobile devices as learning tool and academic performance. The research was carried out using researcher-made questionnaire distributed to 162 Grade 12 students who are currently taking up General Chemistry 2 course this second semester of AY 2018-2019. Statistical treatment of data include weighted mean and Pearson’s r. Results revealed that there is no significant relationship between frequency of mobile device usage as a learning tool during self-regulated learning and academic performance in terms of midterm grade in General Chemistry 2 course based on Pearson’s correlation coefficient of -0.057 with a corresponding p value of 0.236.
Keywords
Academic Performance, ICT in Education, Mobile Devices, Self-Regulated Learning.
User
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
Font Size
Information
- L. Reid, “Identifying threshold concepts in geosciences; Taking inventory with students and faculty alike, threshold concepts, from theory to practice,” in Proc. Conf. Queens University, 2008
- M.B. Nakleh, “Why some students don’t learn chemistry,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 66, issue 3, pp. 223-225, 2012
- Kamisah & Nur, “Conceptual understanding in secondary school chemistry: A discussion of the difficulties experienced by students,” American Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 10, issue 5, pp. 431-441, 2011
- M. Sozbiler & A.N.C.T Pynarbaphy, “Prospective chemistry teachers conceptions of chemical thermodynamics and kinetics,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 6 issue 2, pp. 111-120, 2010
- A.H. Johnstone, “The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing demand,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 70 issue 9, 1993
- D. Ching, C. Schuler, A. Lewis & M. Levine, “Harnessing the potential of mobile technologies for children in learning,” Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Amsterdam, 2009
- G. J. Hwang & C.C. Tsai, “Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 42, pp. 65-70, 2011
- S. Paris & A. Paris, “Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 36 issue 2, pp. 89-101, 2011
- L. Mitchell, (2014)“Rise of the YouTube makeup artist: Nearly half of women use online tutorials,” Available: http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/style/464633/Pixiwoo-Lauren-Curtis-Frozen-Nearly-half-of-women-copy-popularonline-makeup-tutorials
- C. Fahnoe & P. Mishra, “Do 21st century learning environments support self-directed learning? Middle school students’ response to an intentionally designed learning environment,” in R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proc. of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 3131-3139, Chesapeake, VA: AACE, 2013
- M. Knowles (1975) “Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers,” Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall/Cambridge
- B. J. Zimmerman (2009) “Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement, Theoretical Perspectives,” pp. 1-38, New York, Routledge
- E. Panadero & J. Alonso Tapia, “How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning,” Anales de Psicologia, vol. 30 issue 2, pp. 450-462, 2014
- N. Dabbagh & A. Kitsantas, (2013) “Using learning management systems as metacognitive tools to support self-regulation in higher education contexts. In R. Azevedo, & V. Aleven (Eds.),” International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies, pp. 197-211, New York: Springer
- B. J. Zimmerman & A. R. Moylan, (2009) “Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A.C. Graesser (Eds), Handbook of Metacognition in education,” pp. 299-315, New York, Routledge
- V. Richardson, “Constructivist pedagogy,” Teachers College Record, vol. 73, pp. 59-69, 2013
- P. Magdirila. (2013). Philippine smartphone adoption is growing, but users still stick to basic features. [Online] Available: https://www.techinasia.com/philippine-smartphone-adoption-growing-users-stick-basic-features
- D. He, D. Wu, Z. Yue, A. Fu & K.T. Vo, “Undergraduate students’ interaction with online information resources in their academic tasks. A comparative study,” in Proc. ASLIB, 2012, pp. 615-640
- S. Lim, “How and why do college students use Wikipedia?” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 60, issue 11, 2009
- S. Bartholomew, “A mixed-method study of mobile devices and student self-directed learning and achievement during a middle school STEM activity,” PhD dissertation, Dept. of Applies Sciences, Technology & Education, Utah State Univ., 2016.
Abstract Views: 509
PDF Views: 1