IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Embodying Good Moral Woman:Psychological Burdens Lived by Women in India


Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Morality concerns and applies to us through the social system we are a part of. Morals are the defining principles of what is right and wrong. They are learned through the process of socialization, from family, society and through observation. Thus, morality becomes ability, skill and a thought process that enables one to take right moral decisions and exhibit moral behaviour. Serving Patriarchal system; morals for women in our society are largely defined in an androcentric manner and the gender dichotomy in moral orientation remains strong. This study, using literature review is an attempt to reflect upon the kinds of moral values a female in our society is ingrained with and psychological vulnerabilities associated with it; which can help us understand the genesis of day-to-day problematic issues and challenges faced by women today affecting their well-being.

Keywords

Women, Psychological Burdens, Morality and Patriarchy.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abraham, L. (2001). Redrawing the Lakshman Rekha: Gender differences and cultural constructions in youth sexuality in urban India. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 24(s1), 133-156.

  • Agnes, F. (2013). No shortcuts on rape: Make the legal system work Economic and Political Weekly, 48(2) 49.

  • Bajpai, V. (2013). Rape in feudal Bharat. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(4), 4-5.

  • Balla, A., & Vishnu, G. (2013). Rapes will go on. Tehelka, 15(9), 20.

  • Boonzaier, F. (2008). If the man says you must sit, then you must sit: The relational construction of woman abuse: Gender, Subjectivity and violence. Feminism and Psychology, 18(2), 183-206.

  • Bourdieu, R (1977). An outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, R S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. InB. Puka (Ed.), Caring voices and women's moral frames: Gilligan's view (Vol. 6. ,pp. 191-210). New York: Garland.

  • Buhler, G (Ed.) (1886). The laws of Manu, translated, with extracts from seven commentaries. Oxford: Clarendon.

  • Cabral, M., & Astbury, J. (2000) Women's mental health: An evidence based review. Geneva: WorldHealth Organization.

  • Chowdhury, A., &Patnaik, M.M. (2013). Understanding Indian family life: The gender prespectives. EXCEL International Journal of Multidisciplinary Management Studies, 3(7), 58-67.

  • Chowdhary,R (1998). Enforcing cultural codes: Gender and violence in Northern India'. In EJ. Mary and Janaki N (Eds.), A question of silence? The sexual economies of modern India. New Delhi: Kali for Women.

  • Dube, L. (1988). On the construction of gender: Hindu girls in patrilineal India. Economic and Political Weekly, 23(18), 11-19.

  • El-Sawad, A., Arnold, J., & Cohen, L. (2004). Doublethink: The prevalence and function of contradiction in accounts of organisational life. Human Relations, 57,1179-1203.

  • Fernando, W.D.A., & Cohen, L. (2013). Respectable feminity and career agency: Exploring paradoxical imperatives. Gender, Work and Organization, 21(2), 149-164.

  • Foucault,M. (1977). Discipline andPunish: The Birth of Prison. New York: Pantheon.

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

  • Giligan, C, & Brown, L.M. (1992) Meeting at the crossroads: Women's psychology and girl's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Gillem, A.R, Sehgal, R, & Forcet, S. (2000). Understanding prejudice and discrimination. In M. Biaggio and M. Hersen (Eds.), Issues in the psychology of women (pp. 55-69). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

  • Government of India Report (2007). Child abuse in India. Women and Child Development Department, New Delhi.

  • Haye, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Jacques, H.A.K., & Radtke, H.L. (2012). Constrained by choice: Young women negotiate the discourse of marriage and motherhood. Feminism and Psychology, 22(4), 443-461.

  • Jack, D.C. (1991). Silencing the self: Women and depression. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Kakar, S. (1981). The inner world: A psycho-analytic study of childhood and society in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

  • Kakar, S. (1988). Feminine identity in India. In R Ghadially (Ed.), Women in Indian society. New Delhi: Sage

  • Kakar, S. (2013, January 9). is an Indian woman a person? We are caught between the extremes of traditional and western perspectives on women. The Times of India Bangalore, p. 16.

  • Kapur, R. (2012). Hecklers to power? The waning of liberal rights and challenges to feminism in India. In A. Loomba and R A. Lukose (Eds.), South Asian Feminism. Delhi: Zubaan.

  • Kandiyoti, D. (2000). Gender, power and contestation: Rethinking bargaining with patriarchy. In C. Jackson and R. Pearson (Eds.), Feminist visions of development: Gender, analysis and policy (pp. 138-154). New York: Routledge.

  • LeCoutner, A., & Oxlad, M. (2010). Managing accountability for domestic violence: Identities, membership categories and morality in perpetrators' talk'. Feminism and Psychology, 21(1), 5-28.

  • Leibrich, J., Paulin, J., & Ransom, R (1995). Hitting home: Men speak about abuse of women partners. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.

  • Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Lowe, W. H. (1884). Abd al-Quadir Bada'uni: Muntakhab ut-Tawarikh. Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press.

  • Lynch, C. (2007). Juki Girls, Good Girls: Gender and Cultural Politics in Sri Lanka's Global Garment Industry. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

  • Nandy, A. (1980). At the Edge of Psychology: Essays in politics and culture. India: Oxford University Press.

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Girgus, J.S. (1994). The emergence of gender difference in depression during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 424-443.

  • Ortner, S.B. (1996). Is female to male as nature is to culture ? In S. Franklin (Ed.), The sociology of gender: Schools of thought in sociology. U.K: Elgar Reference Collection.

  • Patel, R. (2006). Working the night shift: Gender and the global economy. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 5(1), 927.

  • Phadke, R (2007). Dangerous liaisons, women and men: Risk and reputation in Mumbai. Economic andPolitical Weekly, pp. 1510-1581.

  • Rao, S.K.R (1969). Social Institutions among Hindus. Mysore: Rao andRaghvan.

  • Risseeuw, C. (1988). Thefish don't talk about the water: Gender transformation, power andresistance among women in Sri Lanka. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

  • Ryan, H.G. (1996). From morality to mortality: Women and violence of political change, or law and (b)order. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 22(A), 1-11.

  • Sharma, S. L. (2013). Why the rise in horrendous rapes. Tribune India, 17 June.

  • Suhasini, R. (2012). Loving and Living in 21st Century India', Economic and Political Weekly, 47, Issue 25.

  • Thorpe, D. (1996). Taverns and tavern culture on the southern colonial frontier. Journal of Southern History, 62(A), 661-688.

  • Towns, A. J., & Scott, H. (2013). I couldn't even dress the way I wanted. Young women talk of 'ownership' by boyfriends: An opportunity for the prevention of domestic violence. Feminism andPsychology, 23(A), 536-555.

  • Ussher, J.M. (2010). Are we medicalizing women's misery? A critical review of women's higher rates ofreported depression. Feminism and Psychology, 20(1), 9-35.

  • Velaskar, P. (1998). Caste-patriarchy and the dalit woman's subordination: Towards a theoretical framework Sugava, Dr. AmbedkarSpecialIssue, 4, 54-67.

  • Whitehead, K. (2005). Vocation, career and character in early twentieth-century women teachers work in city schools. History of Education, 34(6), 579-597.

  • Whiteside, H.J. (2007). We shall be respectable: Women and representations of respectability in Lyttelton, pp. 1851-1893. Published thesis, University of Canterbury. Available at:http://library.canterbury.ac.nz/thesis/etheses_copyright. shtml

  • Wolf, N. (1993). Fire with fire: The new female power and how it will change the 21st century. London: Random House.


Abstract Views: 239

PDF Views: 0




  • Embodying Good Moral Woman:Psychological Burdens Lived by Women in India

Abstract Views: 239  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Varsha Singh
Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Ishita Bhardwaj
Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

Abstract


Morality concerns and applies to us through the social system we are a part of. Morals are the defining principles of what is right and wrong. They are learned through the process of socialization, from family, society and through observation. Thus, morality becomes ability, skill and a thought process that enables one to take right moral decisions and exhibit moral behaviour. Serving Patriarchal system; morals for women in our society are largely defined in an androcentric manner and the gender dichotomy in moral orientation remains strong. This study, using literature review is an attempt to reflect upon the kinds of moral values a female in our society is ingrained with and psychological vulnerabilities associated with it; which can help us understand the genesis of day-to-day problematic issues and challenges faced by women today affecting their well-being.

Keywords


Women, Psychological Burdens, Morality and Patriarchy.

References