IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comparison of Abstinent and Relapsed Opioid Dependents on Perceived Social Support


Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, D.A.V. College, Chandigarh, India
2 Department of Psychology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study was a comparison between abstinent and relapsed opioid dependents on perceived social support. The sample of the study consisted of 200 males, out of which 100 were abstinent and 100 were relapsed male opioid dependents. Sample was selected randomly from the Govt. and Private Rehabilitation Centres of Punjab. Muliti-dimentional scale of Perceived Social Support (Zimet et al., 1988) was administered to the study sample. Means, Standard Deviations and t-ratios were calculated to determine the differences between two groups. The findings of the study reveal that relapsed opioid dependents are lower on perceived social support as compared to abstinent opioid dependents. In order to help the drug dependents, one must work towards enhancing their social support, so that their struggle against drugs can be beneficially mediated by the facilitating role of social support.

Keywords

Perceived Support, Abstinent, Relapsed Opioid Dependents, Male.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Afsar, B. (2011). Studying family cognitive performance of MS patients. Master's thesis. Sciences and Culture University, Iran.

  • Atadokht, A., Hajloo, N., Karimi, M., & Narimani, M. (2015). The role of family expressed emotion and perceived social support in predicting addiction relapse. International Journal of High RiskBehaviors and Addiction, 4(1), 1-5.

  • Azrin, N.H., Donohue, B., Besalel, V.A., Kogan, E.S., & Acierno, R. (1994). Youth drug abuse treatment: A controlled outcome study. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 3, 1-15.

  • Baron, D., & Byrne (2005). Socialpsychology (10th ed.). Third Indian reprint: Pearson Education, India, Inc.

  • Battjes, R. I, Onken, L. S., & Delany, P. J. (1999). Drug abuse treatment entry and engagement: Report of a meeting on treatment readiness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(5), 643-657.

  • Broome, K.M., Knightm, D.K., Knight, K., Hiller, M. L., & Simpson, D.D. (1999). Peer, family, and motivational influences on drug treatment process and recidivism for probationers. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 387-397.

  • Broome, K.M., Simpson, D.D., & Joe, G.W. (2002). The role of social support following short-term inpatient treatment. American Journal on Addictions, 11, 57-65.

  • Brown, B.S., O'Grady, K.E., Battjes, R.J., & Katz, E.C. (2004). The community assessment inventory, client views of supports to drug abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27,241-251.

  • Cohen, S.H., & Gottlieb, B.H., & Underwood, L.G. (2000). Social relationships and health: challenges for measurement and intervention. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Constantini, M.F., Wermuth, L., Sorensen, J.L., & Lyons, J.S. (1992). Family functioning as a predictor of progress in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9,331-335.

  • Dackis, C, & O'Brien, C. (2005). Neurobiology of addiction: Treatment and public policy ramifications. Nature Nreuroscience, 5(11), 1431 -143 6.

  • Din, M.M.R, Amini, K., Yazdan, & Khah, M.R (2007). Survey of social and environmental factors related to the relapse of addiction in volunteer addicted individuals in welfare organization of Zanjan. Journal of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, 15(59), 85-94.

  • Dskender, M., & Tanrikulu, T. (2010). Social support, social comparison and anger. International Journal of Human Sciences, 7(1), 899-911.

  • Esenay, F. I. (2002). The investigation of the relationship between the health behavior of university students and social support and self-esteem. Unpublished master's thesis. Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.

  • Galanter, M. (2006). Innovations: Alcohol and drug abuse, spirituality in alcoholics anonymous, avaluable adjunct to psychiatric services. Psychiatric Services, 57(3), 30-79.

  • Gruber, K. J., & Fleetwood, T.W. (2004). In-home continuing care services for substance use affectedfamilies. Substance UseMisuse, 39, 1379-1403.

  • Hanlon, T.E., Nurco, D.N., Bateman, R.W., & O'Grady, K. E. (1998). The response of drug abuser parolees to a combination of treatment and intensive supervision. The Prison Journal, 78, 31-44.

  • Hashemi, T, Fotouhibonab, S., Karimi, H.R., & Beirami, M. (2010).Role of irrational beliefs, perceptions, self-efficacy and social support on recurrence of substance abuse disorder. Journal of Research and Addiction, 4(13), 7-23.

  • Havassy, B. E., Hall, S.M., & Wasserman, DA. (1991). Social support and relapse: Commonalities among alcoholics, opiate users, and cigarette smokers. Addictive Behaviours, 16,235-246.

  • Joe, G.W., Simpson, D.D., & Broome, K.M. (1999). Retention and patient engagement models for different modalities inDATOS. .Drag.4/co/io/.De/>eM, 57,113-125.

  • Kahriman, I. (2002). The relationship between perceived social supportfromfamily and friends and self-esteem in adolescents. Unpublished master's thesis. Atatiirk University, Erzurum, Turkey.

  • Kelling, G., & Coles, C. (1996). Fixing broken windows: Restoring order and reducing crime in our communities. New York: Free Press.

  • Kelly, S.M. (2005). Holistic re-entry: A multidimensional analysis of the revolving prison door. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67,175.UMINo. 3207287.

  • Maddi, S. R., Wadhwa, P., & Haier, RJ. (1996). Relationship of hardiness to alcohol and drug use in adolescents. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 22,247-257.

  • McCrady, B.S., & Epstein, E.E. (1999). Theoretical bases of family approaches to substance abuse treatment. In F. Rotger, D.S. Kekker, and J. Morganstern (Eds.), Treating substance abuse: Theory and technique (pp. 117-142). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Moore, J., & Finkelstein, N. (2001). Parenting services for families affected by substance abuse. Child Welfare, 80,221-238.

  • Nielsen, D.A., Ho, A., Bahl, A., Varma, P., Kellogg, S., & Borg, L. (2012). Former heroin addicts with or without a history of cocaine dependence are more impulsive than controls. Drug andAlcoholDependency, 124(1-2), 113-120.

  • Nirmala, M. C. (2005). Family and drug addiction. Coordinated by: UNODC, Regional Office for South Asia, pp. 1-2. Retrived on 5 September, 2017 from http://wwwwesothasians.org.

  • Nurco, D.N, Kinlock, T.W., O'Grady, K.E., & Hanlon, T.E. (1996). Early family adversity as a precursor to narcotic addiction. Drug and Alcohol Dependency 43, 103-113.

  • O'Farrell, T.J., & Feehan, M. (1999). Alcoholism treatment and the family: Do family and individual treatments for alcoholic adults have preventive effects for children? Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 13,125-129.

  • Oswald, H., & Suss, K. U. (1994). The influence of parents and peers on misconduct at school: Simultaneous and synergistic effects. In R.K. Silbereisen and E. Todt (Eds.). Adolescence in context: The interplay of family, school, peers, and work in adjustment. New York: Springer-Verlag Inc.

  • Piko (2000). Perceived social support from parents and peers: Which is the stronger predictor of adolescent substance use? Substance use Misuse, 35(4), 617-630.

  • Sampson, R.J., Raudenbush, S.W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: Amultilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277,918-924.

  • Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., & Sarason, B. R. (1983). Assessing social support: The social support questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44,127-139.

  • Skogan, W. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American Cities. Berkeley: University of CaliforniaPress.

  • Stanford, M. S., Mathias, C. W., Dougherty, D. M., Lake, S. L., Anderson, N. E., & Patton, J. H. (2009). Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: An update and review. Personality andIndividualDifferences, 47(5), 385-395.

  • Strauss, S., & Falkin, G. (2001). Social support systems of women offenders who use drugs: A focus on the mother-daughter relationship. American Journal of Drug AlcoholAbuse, 27,65-89.

  • Tucker, M.B. (1985). U.S. ethnic minorities and drug abuse: An assessment of the science and practice. Journal of Addiction, 20,1021-1048.

  • Unuvar, A. (2003). The effect of formal various perceived social support on the self esteem and problem solving abilities of high school students at the age of fifteen to e/g/tfeeM.Unpublishedmaster'sthesis. SelcukUniversity, Konya, Turkey

  • Watts, W. D., & Wright, L. S. (1990). The drug use violent delinquency link among Mexican-Americans. In M. De La Rosa, E. Lambert, and B. Gropper (Eds.), Drugs and violence: Causes, correlates and consequences (pp. 8-43). NIDA Research Monograph. Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

  • Wilson, J.Q., & Kelling, G. (1982). The police and neighborhood safety: Broken windows. Atlantic, 127, 29-38.

  • Woff, I, Toumbourou, J, Herlihy, E, Hamilton, M, & Wales, S. (1996). Service providers perceptions of substance use self-help groups. Substance Use and Misuse, 37,1241-1258.

  • Wynne, R.D, McCrady, B.S, Kahler, C.W, Liddle, H.A., Palmer, R.B, & Horberg, L.K. (1996). When addictions affect the family. In M. Harway (Ed.), Treating the changing family (pp. 293-317). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Zilberman, M.L., Tavares, H., & El-Guebaly, N. (2003). Relationship between craving and personality in treatment-seeking women with substance-related disorders. British Medical Council of Psychiatry, 3, 1 -5.

  • Zimet, G D., Dahlem, N.W, Zimet, S.G, &Farley, G.K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality and Assessment, 52( 1), 3 0-41.


Abstract Views: 369

PDF Views: 0




  • A Comparison of Abstinent and Relapsed Opioid Dependents on Perceived Social Support

Abstract Views: 369  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Shruti Shourie
Department of Psychology, D.A.V. College, Chandigarh, India
Lakhminder Singh
Department of Psychology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

Abstract


The present study was a comparison between abstinent and relapsed opioid dependents on perceived social support. The sample of the study consisted of 200 males, out of which 100 were abstinent and 100 were relapsed male opioid dependents. Sample was selected randomly from the Govt. and Private Rehabilitation Centres of Punjab. Muliti-dimentional scale of Perceived Social Support (Zimet et al., 1988) was administered to the study sample. Means, Standard Deviations and t-ratios were calculated to determine the differences between two groups. The findings of the study reveal that relapsed opioid dependents are lower on perceived social support as compared to abstinent opioid dependents. In order to help the drug dependents, one must work towards enhancing their social support, so that their struggle against drugs can be beneficially mediated by the facilitating role of social support.

Keywords


Perceived Support, Abstinent, Relapsed Opioid Dependents, Male.

References