IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Looking for Gender Differences among Adolescents on Well-Being


Affiliations
1 Morphic Minds, Chandigarh, India
2 Department of Psychology, D.A.V. College, Chandigarh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Adolescence is a crucial stage in life and the growing child's experiences have a long lasting impact on their mental health. Parental practices vis-a-vis child's biological sex can bring out experiential differences in terms of their happiness and well-being. The present investigation aims to look for gender differences among adolescents on well-being. For the purpose of the present study, a total of 102 adolescent students studying in a government school in Mohali, have been studied on all the study variables. Out of 102 students, 5 8 are boys and 44 are girls, all in the age range of 14 to 17 years. The subjects were assessed on The Happiness Measure (Fordyce, 1988); Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R) (Scheier & Carver, 1994); Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Goodman, 2007); General Self-Efficacy Scale (Schwarzer, 1992); and The Sterling's Children Weil-Being Scale (Liddle & Carter, 2009). The assessment was done with the goal of looking for gender differences among adolescents on well-being. Results indicated that the mean scores on happiness, hyperactivity, emotional symptoms, conduct problems, peer pressure, and positive outlook, are higher for boys. The mean scores on optimism, positive emotional state, and total well-being are higher for girls. The mean scores on prosocial behaviour and self efficacy have come out to be equal for boys and girls. Sex differences emerged only on peer pressure implying boys to be more influenced by peer pressure than girls. The paper will try to understand the trends of the findings.

Keywords

Adolescents, Well-Being, Happiness, Self Efficacy, Children's Well-Being.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bandura,A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).

  • Baumgardner, S.R., & Crothers, M. K. (2009). Positive psychology. New Delhi: Pearson Publication.

  • Busseri, M.A., & Sadava, S.W. (2010). Areview of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 75(3), 290-314.

  • Chirkov, V., Ryan, R.M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97-110.

  • Deci, E.L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology Psychology Research, 27, 17-34.

  • Deci, E.L.,& Ryan, R.M. (1995). Human autonomy. In Efficacy, agency and self esteem (31-49). Springer, Boston, MA.

  • Derdiman-Eiron, R., Indredavik, M. S., Bratberg, G. H., Taraldsen, G., Bakken, I. J., & Colton, M. (2011). Gender differences in subjective well-being, self-esteem and psychosocial functioning in adolescents with symptoms of anxiety and depression: Findings from the Nord-Trondelag health study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,52(3),267 doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00859 .x

  • Desi, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. Perspectives on Motivation, 38(237), 237-288.

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.

  • Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34-43.

  • Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2011). Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. John Wiley and Sons.

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H.L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.

  • Diener, Ed. (2008). Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. Maiden, MA: Blackwell Pub.

  • Froh, J.J., Yurkewicz, C, & Kashdan, T.B. (2009). Gratitude and subjective well-being in early adolescence: Examining gender differences. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 633-650.

  • Fuligni, A. J., & Eccles, J. S. (1993). Perceived parent-child relationships and early adolescents orientation toward peers. Developmental Psychology, 29(A), 622-632.

  • Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581-586.

  • Goodman, R., & Scott, S. (1999). Comparing the strengths and difficulties questionnaire and child behaviour checklist: Is small beautiful? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27(1), 17-24.

  • Goodman, R, Meltzer, H., & Bailey, V. (1998). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: Apilot study on the validity of the self-report version. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 7(3), 125-130.

  • Goodman, R., Renfrew, D., & Mullick, M. (2000). Predicting type of psychiatric disorder from Strenghts andDifficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores in child mental health clinics in London and Dhaka. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9(2), 129-134.

  • Ho, M. Y, Cheung, F M., & Cheung, S. F (2010). The role of meaning in life and optimism in promoting wellness. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(5), 658-663.

  • Kaufman, S.B. (2016, January 30). The differences between happiness and meaning in life. Retrieved from http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/the-differences-between-happiness-and-meaning-in-life/

  • Liddle, I., & Carter, G. (2009). Emotional and psychological well-being in children: The standardization of Sterling's Children's Well-being Scale. Sterling council for Educational psychology service.

  • Liddle, I., & Carter, G. F. A. (2015). Emotional and psychological well-being in children: The development and validation of the Stirling's Children Well-Being Scale. Educational Psychology in Practice, 31(2), 174-185. DOI: 10.1080/0266 7363.2015.1008409

  • Myers,D.G.,&Diener, Ed. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6(1), 10-19.

  • Naci, H., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2015). Evaluation of wellness determinants and interventions by citizen scientists. Jama, 314(2), 121-122.

  • O'brien, C. (2008). Sustainable happiness: How happiness studies can contribute to a more sustainable future. Canadian Psychology, 49(4), 289-294.

  • Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.L68

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Exploration on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.

  • Ryff, CD., & Keyes, C.L.M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(A), 719-727.

  • Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (& trait anxiety, self-mastery, & self-esteem): Are-evaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67,1063-1078.

  • Seifert, T. A. (2005). The Ryff Scales of Psychological Well-Being. Retrieved from http://www.liberalarts.wabash.edu/ryff-scales/

  • Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Redefining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138-161.

  • Steve, B.,& Crothers,M.K. (2016). Positive psychology. New Delhi: PearsonPubli cation.

  • Stone, L. L., Otten, R, Engels, R C, Vermulst, A. A., & Janssens, J. M. (2010). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4-to-l 2-year-olds: A review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13(3) 254-274.

  • Stone, L.L., Otten, R., Engels, R.C., Vermulst, A.A., & Janssens, J.M. (2010). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4-to 12-year-olds: A review. Clinical Child and Family Psycho logy Review, 13(3) 254-274.

  • Toner, E., Haslam, N., Robinson, J., & Williams, P. (2012). Character strengths and well-being in adolescence: Structure and correlates of the values in action inventory of strengths for children. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5), 637-642.

  • Tov, W., & Diener, E. (2013). Subjective well-being. In K. D. Keith (Ed.), Encyclopedia of 'cross cultural psychology (Vol. 3,pp. 1239-1245). Maiden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • White, M.P, & Dolan, P. (2009). Accounting for the richness of daily activities. Psychological Science, 20(8), 1000-1008.


Abstract Views: 271

PDF Views: 0




  • Looking for Gender Differences among Adolescents on Well-Being

Abstract Views: 271  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Navneet Kaur
Morphic Minds, Chandigarh, India
Shruti Shourie
Department of Psychology, D.A.V. College, Chandigarh, India

Abstract


Adolescence is a crucial stage in life and the growing child's experiences have a long lasting impact on their mental health. Parental practices vis-a-vis child's biological sex can bring out experiential differences in terms of their happiness and well-being. The present investigation aims to look for gender differences among adolescents on well-being. For the purpose of the present study, a total of 102 adolescent students studying in a government school in Mohali, have been studied on all the study variables. Out of 102 students, 5 8 are boys and 44 are girls, all in the age range of 14 to 17 years. The subjects were assessed on The Happiness Measure (Fordyce, 1988); Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R) (Scheier & Carver, 1994); Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Goodman, 2007); General Self-Efficacy Scale (Schwarzer, 1992); and The Sterling's Children Weil-Being Scale (Liddle & Carter, 2009). The assessment was done with the goal of looking for gender differences among adolescents on well-being. Results indicated that the mean scores on happiness, hyperactivity, emotional symptoms, conduct problems, peer pressure, and positive outlook, are higher for boys. The mean scores on optimism, positive emotional state, and total well-being are higher for girls. The mean scores on prosocial behaviour and self efficacy have come out to be equal for boys and girls. Sex differences emerged only on peer pressure implying boys to be more influenced by peer pressure than girls. The paper will try to understand the trends of the findings.

Keywords


Adolescents, Well-Being, Happiness, Self Efficacy, Children's Well-Being.

References