Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

IEEE 802 Standard Network’s Comparison under Grid and Random Node Arrangement in 2.4 GHz ISM Band for Single and Multiple CBR Traffic


Affiliations
1 Department of ECE, Dr. Mahalingam College of Engineering & Technology, Udumalai Road, Pollachi -642003, India
 

The IEEE 802 standard well-known as 802.11 called as Wi-Fi network, 802.15.4 called as ZigBee or sensor network and 802.15.1 called as Bluetooth network. The network such as ZigBee, Bluetooth and Wi-Fi works in 2.4 GHz ISM band. All the above networks works in same ISM band of 2.4 GHz, but the performance of the network varies. The performance of simulation depends upon the coverage area, data rates, and power consumption in each network. The heterogeneous network performances is evaluated with static and mobility model in random and grid node placement by varying the traffic loads of one CBR and with five CBR for each network. The simulation result is compared in terms of jitter, average end to end delay and throughput to analyze the network performance in the 2.4 GHz frequency band. IEEE 802.11 network shows the low jitter and delay value with high throughput compared with sensor network.


Keywords

CBR Traffic Loads, IEEE 802.15.4, IEEE 802.11, Qualnet 5.0.2 Simulator, Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs).
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • P.N.Renjith and E.Baburaj, “Analysis On Ad Hoc Routing Protocols In Wireless Sensor Networks”, in International Journal of Ad hoc, Sensor & Ubiquitous Computing (IJASUC), Vol.3, No.6, pp. 3480-3493.2012.
  • P. Samundiswary, K Dilip, “Performance Analysis of Energy Aware LAR Protocol in IEEE 802.15.4 based Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks”, in International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), Vol 3, Issue9,pp.1243-1255, 2014.
  • PratibhaKevre, LaxmiShrivastava., “Compare threereactive routing protocols in grid based cluster wireless sensor network using qualnet simulator”, in International journal of Applied Sciences and Engineering Research, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2014.
  • Manju Khurana “Direction Determination in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Grid Topology”,in Journal Of Emerging Technologies In Web Intelligence, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2013.
  • Gurjit Kaur, Kunal Malik and Kiran Ahuja., “Impact on Power Consumption of ZigBee based Home Automation Network using Various Traffic”, in International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking ,Vol.6, No.6 , pp.17-24,2013.
  • Dhanvanthri Gokulkrishna1, Rinki Sharma, Narasimha Murthy3, “Design And Implementation Of A Routing Protocol For Mobile Ad HocNetworks”, In Sastech 29, Vol.10, Issue 2, 2011.
  • Manish Uzzwal1, Rajan Sharma2, “Energy Efficient MAC Protocol & Radio Energy Model for AODV & Bellman Ford Routing Protocol”, in IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering (IOSR-JECE).Vol 9, Issue 1, pp. 44-50 ,2014.
  • Prinu C. PhilipȦ, Rajeev PaulusȦ, A.K. JaiswalȦ and A. AshokȦ, “Comparative Analysis of Adhoc Routing Protocols in Wi-Fi & Wi Max Networks using QualNet 6.1”, in International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, Vol.4, No.1 2014.
  • Prof. K.H. Wandra, Dr. Ketan Kotecha and Mitul R. Khandhedia, “Various effect of modulation schemes on Wi-Fi Network using Qualnet Simulator”, in International Conference on Education Technology and Computer (ICETC),2010.
  • Pulak Singh, Mayur Kumar and A.K.Jaiswal,“Characteristic Analysis of Mobility using Heterogeneous Network”, in International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 119,No.9, 2015.
  • Dr. Sumathi.K, Kiruthika Gowri.D Sathiyapriya.T Sureshkumar.K, “Performance Analysis of various MANET Protocols based on Route Processing using different Antenna Models”,
  • Dr. Sumathi, K. Suresh Kumar, T. Sathiyapriya, and D. Kiruthika Gowri , “An Investigation on the Impact of Weather Modelling on Various MANET Routing Protocols”, in Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 8(15), 59557, July 2015.
  • Jaslin Deva Gifty. J and Dr Sumathi K, “Simulation Of Wireless Sensor Network With Hybrid Topology “in ICTACT Journal On Communication Technology, March 2016, Volume: 07, Issue .01.

Abstract Views: 235

PDF Views: 5




  • IEEE 802 Standard Network’s Comparison under Grid and Random Node Arrangement in 2.4 GHz ISM Band for Single and Multiple CBR Traffic

Abstract Views: 235  |  PDF Views: 5

Authors

J. Jaslin Deva Gifty
Department of ECE, Dr. Mahalingam College of Engineering & Technology, Udumalai Road, Pollachi -642003, India
K. Sumathi
Department of ECE, Dr. Mahalingam College of Engineering & Technology, Udumalai Road, Pollachi -642003, India

Abstract


The IEEE 802 standard well-known as 802.11 called as Wi-Fi network, 802.15.4 called as ZigBee or sensor network and 802.15.1 called as Bluetooth network. The network such as ZigBee, Bluetooth and Wi-Fi works in 2.4 GHz ISM band. All the above networks works in same ISM band of 2.4 GHz, but the performance of the network varies. The performance of simulation depends upon the coverage area, data rates, and power consumption in each network. The heterogeneous network performances is evaluated with static and mobility model in random and grid node placement by varying the traffic loads of one CBR and with five CBR for each network. The simulation result is compared in terms of jitter, average end to end delay and throughput to analyze the network performance in the 2.4 GHz frequency band. IEEE 802.11 network shows the low jitter and delay value with high throughput compared with sensor network.


Keywords


CBR Traffic Loads, IEEE 802.15.4, IEEE 802.11, Qualnet 5.0.2 Simulator, Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs).

References