International Journal of Advanced Networking and Applications

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Framework for Evaluating the Impact of Organizational Structure on Knowledge Management(Case Study:ICT Organization of Tehran Municipality)


Affiliations
1 Master of Management Information and Communication Technology, Department of Information Technology Management, Islamic Azad University, an Electronic Unit, Iran, Islamic Republic of
2 Islamic Azad University, Science Nhqyqat, Department of Management, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of
 

Today, knowledge management as the systematic application of measures that tangible and in tangible assets for purposes of the application of existing knowledge inside and outside the organization shall control and guidance and the way to create value and new knowledge improves. This study aims to provide a framework for evaluating the impact of organizational structure on knowledge management and ICT Tehran Municipality has been made.

The study of the nature of the application; descriptive - survey is, the study sample of 400employees of Tehran municipality is ICT. Of these, 200 subjects were selected. In order to gather the views of staff, two questionnaires were distributed among employees.

The 39-question questionnaire sample group organizational structure (with three sub-scale formalization, centralization and complexity with 22, 9 and 7RP) and 28 questions of knowledge management (with three subscale creation, transfer and retain knowledge with 6, 11 and 11 questions) responded.

Data from the questionnaires using Spearman correlation and structural equation modeling using software (AMOS v.20) and (SPSS v.19) was analyzed.

Results of structural equation modeling showed that both recognition and focus on organizational dimensions of knowledge management was a significant inverse relationship. The complexity of the dimensions of knowledge management has a direct and significant relationship. Significant relations show that each of the three dimensions of organizational structure directly in knowledge creation, knowledge transfer and retention of knowledge in the organization are affected. Employees who voluntarily and spontaneous creation, transmission and preservation of knowledge activities.


Keywords

Organizational Structure, Complexity, Formalization, Centralization, Blugod Model, Knowledge Management, Knowledge Creation, Knowledge Transfer, Knowledge Retention.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  •  A. Akhgar, Babak B. Jahanian, Khashayar,2010, Knowledge management: a practical guide, compass and step by step: principles/strategies/implementation, Tehran: first look: Anthology of science knowledge.

  •  A.Akhavan,Peyman B.Bagheri, Rohollah, 2010, Knowledge management: from ideas to action: first, future oriented.

  •  Hossein Rezazadeh mahrizy, b. Ali, Mehdi Bagherzadeh Nayeri, Professor c. d. Pirdel, m., 2010, knowledge management tools, Tehran: Institute for intelligent processing art and cultural signs, first.

  •  (a). Moghimi, Seyyed Mohammad b. Ramadan, Majid, 2011 bulletin management 10 (knowledge management and information technology), radan, Tehran first.

  •  Daft, Richard l., 1995, theory of organization and design the structure of the first volume, parsayan and Seyed Ali translation aarabi, commercial printing and publishing company: affiliated to the Institute of business studies & research, vol. 1

  •  Daft, Richard l. (2001), theory and design of organizations (TRANS. a. parsaeian and Seyed Mohammad aarabi), Tehran: cultural research Office.

  •  Schumacher, Randall. , And Lomks, Richard. GR (2009), "an introduction to structural equation modeling", trans. v. Ghasemi, first edition, Tehran: entesharat sociologists.

  •  Robbins, Stephen p, 1997, theory of Organization (structure, design, and applications), translated by Seyyed Hasan elwani danaeifard, Saffar, first.

  •  Adli, Fariba, 2005, knowledge management: moving beyond knowledge, cognitive thought, Tehran: the first.

  •  Ali Mohammad lo,M.2004.management knowledge and talent,devise, no.147.

  •  Qasemi, Wahid (2010), "structural equation modeling in social research with application of Amos Graphics", publishing sociologists

  •  Monavaryan, a., Asgari, n., familiar, m. (2007), structural and content aspects of the knowledgebased organization, Razi International Convention Center.

  •  Moghimi, Seyed, 2001, organization and management of the research approach, Tehran: Termeh, II.

  •  Hall, h. Richard, 1997, organization: structure, process and RA parsayan, traction and Seyed Mohammad aarabi Ali translation, cultural research, Tehran: the first Office.

  •  Gohari,Hamide, 2009:The development of human resources of the country public library institutions, knowledge management, Alzahra University, supervisor: brother, dream, Advisor: Khuzestani Kiani, Hassan.

  •  Akhavan,p.,Jafari, M.,(2006), “Critical Success factors for knowledge management systems: amulti case analysis” , European Business Review, Vol, 18 No.2, pp.97-113.

  •  Arnold, Hugh J. Feldman, Daniel C (1986), Organization Behavior, New York: McGrawHill.

  •  Barney, Jay B. Griffin, Ricky W (1992), The Management of Organization, Boston: Houghton Mifflin company.

  •  Covin, J. G. Slevin, D. P (1990, b), “Judging entrepreneurial style and organizational structures: How to get your act together”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 31, pp. 43-53.

  •  Caruana, A., Ewing, T.M. and Ramaseshan, B (2002), “Effects of some environmental challenges and centralization on the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of public sector entities”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 43-58.

  •  Carrier, C (1996), “Intrapreneurship in small businesses: an exploratory study”, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 5-21.

  •  Daft, Richard L (1991), Organization Theory and Design, Third Edition: West publishing company.

  •  Damanpour, fariborz (1996), “Organizational complexity and innovation”, Management science. Vol. 42, No. 5: pp. 693-716  Fry, Louis w. Slocum, John W (1984), “Technology, structure and work group effectiveness: A test of a contingency model”, Academy of management journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 221-246.

  •  Fredrickson, James W (1996), “The strategic decision process and organizational structure”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No. 2), pp. 280-297.

  •  Fry, Louis w. Slocum, John W (1984), “Technology, structure and work group effectiveness: A test of a contingency model”, Academy of management journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 221-246.

  •  Leibowitz, J.()," Key ingredients to the success of an organization’s knowledge

  •  Lee, H. & choi, B. (2003), Knowledge Management Enablers, Process & Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination, Journal of Management Information Systems",20(1).

  •  Marsh, Robert M. Mannari, Hiroshi (1981), “Technology and Size as Determinant of the organizational structure”, Administration Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 33-57.

  •  Nevo, D. and Chan, Y. E. (), A Delphi of Knowledge Management Systems: Scope of Requirements, Information &Management, (), pp: .

  •  Management strategy", Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. ٦, No. , pp..

  •  Robbins, Stephen P (1987), Organization Theory, New York: prentice- Hall.

  •  Rooney, D. & Hearn, G. (2002), "The Future Role ofGovernment in Knowledge-Based Economy", Foresight, 4 (6), 22-33

  •  Willmott, Hugh (1981), “The structuring of organizational structure”, Administration Science Quarterly. Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 470-4.


Abstract Views: 428

PDF Views: 3




  • A Framework for Evaluating the Impact of Organizational Structure on Knowledge Management(Case Study:ICT Organization of Tehran Municipality)

Abstract Views: 428  |  PDF Views: 3

Authors

Farashi Marjan
Master of Management Information and Communication Technology, Department of Information Technology Management, Islamic Azad University, an Electronic Unit, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Reshadatjoo Hamideh
Islamic Azad University, Science Nhqyqat, Department of Management, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Abstract


Today, knowledge management as the systematic application of measures that tangible and in tangible assets for purposes of the application of existing knowledge inside and outside the organization shall control and guidance and the way to create value and new knowledge improves. This study aims to provide a framework for evaluating the impact of organizational structure on knowledge management and ICT Tehran Municipality has been made.

The study of the nature of the application; descriptive - survey is, the study sample of 400employees of Tehran municipality is ICT. Of these, 200 subjects were selected. In order to gather the views of staff, two questionnaires were distributed among employees.

The 39-question questionnaire sample group organizational structure (with three sub-scale formalization, centralization and complexity with 22, 9 and 7RP) and 28 questions of knowledge management (with three subscale creation, transfer and retain knowledge with 6, 11 and 11 questions) responded.

Data from the questionnaires using Spearman correlation and structural equation modeling using software (AMOS v.20) and (SPSS v.19) was analyzed.

Results of structural equation modeling showed that both recognition and focus on organizational dimensions of knowledge management was a significant inverse relationship. The complexity of the dimensions of knowledge management has a direct and significant relationship. Significant relations show that each of the three dimensions of organizational structure directly in knowledge creation, knowledge transfer and retention of knowledge in the organization are affected. Employees who voluntarily and spontaneous creation, transmission and preservation of knowledge activities.


Keywords


Organizational Structure, Complexity, Formalization, Centralization, Blugod Model, Knowledge Management, Knowledge Creation, Knowledge Transfer, Knowledge Retention.

References