International Journal of Advanced Networking and Applications

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparisons of Distributed Energy Efficient Clustering (DEEC) and its variation for WSN to the Internet of Things Applications


Affiliations
1 Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Department of Computer Science, Sohag University, Sohag, 82524, Egypt
2 Faculty of Science, Department of Computer Science, Sohag University, Sohag, 82524, Egypt
 

The main thing we work on is Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) which contain numerous sensor nodes with limited power resources, which report sensed data to the Base Station (BS) that requires high energy usage. We want to let the battery live as long as we can, as the cost of changing batteries of nodes is high and also difficult. So, we use efficient protocols which improve the way the sensors use to send and receive sensed data to BS on other hand, nodes closer to the base station are exploited as they have to spend additional energy in relying on data of faraway nodes. This brings in the idea of implementing blanket coverage in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks for the internet of things. In this paper, we first test Distributed Energy Efficient Clustering (DEEC), Developed DEEC (DDEEC), Enhanced DEEC (EDEEC), Threshold DEEC (TDEEC), and Improved DEEC Protocol (IDEEC) under several different scenarios. We observe thoroughly the performance based on stability period, network lifetime, and throughput. EDEEC and TDEEC perform better in all heterogeneous scenarios containing variable heterogeneity in terms of lifetime, however, TDEEC is best of all for the stability period of the network. IDEEC is better than DDEEC in terms of Overhead, but TDEEC is the best. However, the performance of DEEC and DDEEC is highly affected by changing the heterogeneity parameters of the network.

Keywords

Cluster, Head, Residual, Energy, Efficient, Wireless, Sensor, Networks , Heterogeneous network, Stability period, Initial energy, IoT, DEEC, DDEEC, EDEEC, IDEEC,TDEEC.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • I.F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, E. Cayirci, "Wireless sensor networks: a survey, Computer Networks", 38 (4) (2002) 393-422.

  • P. Krishna, N.H. Vaidya, M. Chatterjee, D. Pradhan, "A cluster-based approach for routing in dynamic networks, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review", 27 (2) (1997) 49-65.

  • B. McDonald, T. Znati, "Design and performance of a distributed dynamic clustering algorithm for Ad-Hoc networks", in: Proceedings of the Annual Simulation Symposium, 2001.

  • V. Mhatre, C. Rosenberg, D. Kofman, R. Mazumdar, N. Shroff, "Design of surveillance sensor grids with a lifetime constraint", in: lst European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN), Berlin, January 2004.

  • W.R. Heinzelman, A.P. Chandrakasan, H. Balakrishnan, "Energy efficient communication protocol for wireless micro sensor networks", in: Proceedings of the 33 rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-33), January 2000.

  • W.R. Heinzelman, A.P. Chandrakasan, H. Balakrishnan, "An applicationspecific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks", IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 1 (4) (2002) 660-670.

  • S. Lindsey, C.S. Raghavenda, PEGASIS: "power efficient gathering in sensor information systems", in: Proceeding of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, March 2002.

  • O. Younis, S. Fahmy, HEED: "A hybrid, energyefficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks", IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 3(4)(2004)660 − 669.

  • G. Smaragdakis, I. Matta, A. Bestavros, "SEP: A Stable Election Protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor network", in: Second International Workshop on Sensor and Actor Network Protocols and Applications (SANPA 2004), 2004

  • L. Qing, Q. Zhu, M. Wang, "Design of a distributed energy-efficient clustering algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor network", ELSEVIER, Computer Communications 29,2006, pp 2230- 2237.

  • Elbhiri, B. , Saadane, R. , El Fkihi, S. Aboutajdine, D. "Developed Distributed EnergyEfficient Clustering (DDEEC) for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks", in: 5th International Symposium on I/V Communications and Mobile Network (ISVC), 2010.

  • Parul Saini, Ajay.K.Sharma, "E-DEECEnhanced Distributed Energy Efficient Clustering Scheme for heterogeneous WSN", in: 2010lst International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC − 2010).

  • Parul Saini, Ajay.K.Sharma, "Energy Efficient Scheme for Clustering Protocol Prolonging the Lifetime of Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks", International Journal of Computer Applications (09758887), Volume 6 No.2, September 2010 .

  • Sahar Alsafi, Samani A. Talab, "Implementation of DEEC, DDEEC, EDEEC andTDEEC Protocols using MATLAB in WirelessSensor Network", Int. J. Advanced Networking and Applications, Volume: 12 Issue: 03 Pages: 45964600(2020) ISSN: 0975-0290.

  • Benyin, X., Chaowei, W.,” An improved distributedenergy efficient clustering algorithm for heterogeneous WSNs”. In: IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp. 19-22, San Francisco, CA (2017).

  • Trupti Mayee Behera, Umesh Chandra Samal, Sushanta Kumar Mohapatra,” Energy-efficient modified LEACH protocol for IoT application”, IET Wirel. Sens. Syst.© The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2018, May 2018.

  • Hamdy H. Elsayed,Hassan ShabanHassan,‘Performance Comparison of Various HierarchicalWSNRouting Protocols’, Int. J. Advanced Networking andApplications, Volume: 11 Issue: 02 pp. 4218-4223, ISSN:0975-0290, 2019.


Abstract Views: 175

PDF Views: 0




  • Comparisons of Distributed Energy Efficient Clustering (DEEC) and its variation for WSN to the Internet of Things Applications

Abstract Views: 175  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Hamdy H. El-Sayed
Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Department of Computer Science, Sohag University, Sohag, 82524, Egypt
Zainab Mostafa Hashem
Faculty of Science, Department of Computer Science, Sohag University, Sohag, 82524, Egypt

Abstract


The main thing we work on is Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) which contain numerous sensor nodes with limited power resources, which report sensed data to the Base Station (BS) that requires high energy usage. We want to let the battery live as long as we can, as the cost of changing batteries of nodes is high and also difficult. So, we use efficient protocols which improve the way the sensors use to send and receive sensed data to BS on other hand, nodes closer to the base station are exploited as they have to spend additional energy in relying on data of faraway nodes. This brings in the idea of implementing blanket coverage in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks for the internet of things. In this paper, we first test Distributed Energy Efficient Clustering (DEEC), Developed DEEC (DDEEC), Enhanced DEEC (EDEEC), Threshold DEEC (TDEEC), and Improved DEEC Protocol (IDEEC) under several different scenarios. We observe thoroughly the performance based on stability period, network lifetime, and throughput. EDEEC and TDEEC perform better in all heterogeneous scenarios containing variable heterogeneity in terms of lifetime, however, TDEEC is best of all for the stability period of the network. IDEEC is better than DDEEC in terms of Overhead, but TDEEC is the best. However, the performance of DEEC and DDEEC is highly affected by changing the heterogeneity parameters of the network.

Keywords


Cluster, Head, Residual, Energy, Efficient, Wireless, Sensor, Networks , Heterogeneous network, Stability period, Initial energy, IoT, DEEC, DDEEC, EDEEC, IDEEC,TDEEC.

References