Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Performance Evaluation of LEACH, PEGASIS and TEEN Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks based on Network Lifetime


Affiliations
1 School of Computing & Informatics, College of Engineering & Technology, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia
 

With the advancement of technology in communication and electronic components, cheap and tiny microprocessors that are used to create wireless networks are becoming more readily available. The primary goal of this work is to compare the performance of various routing protocols chosen from wireless sensor networks (WSN) based on network lifetime. To do this, three well-known energy saving hierarchical routing protocols called Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy (LEACH), Power-Efficient Gathering in Sensor Information Systems (PEGASIS) and Threshold Sensitive Energy Efficient Sensor Network Protocol (TEEN) were selected for the study. Because these network protocols rely on hierarchical structures to function and save energy, they are fascinating to investigate. In this research, four-performance metrics considered namely number of nodes in alive, average energy dissipated, operating nodes per round and network lifetime. As a result, the researcher conducted a general analysis of the protocols in terms of performance metrics. The findings of the study show that among the three routing protocols, PEGASIS has longer network lifetime and lesser power consumption while LEACH has the least network lifetime and the highest power consumption. On the other hand, TEEN has been figured out that it has medium performance in terms of both power consumption and network lifetime. This shows that LEACH is ideal for small networks and can be preferable during critical times. Whereas, PEGASIS is ideal for large networks as it has efficient power consumption which results in longer network lifetime.

Keywords

Network Lifetime, Performance, Routing Protocol, Wireless Sensor Networks.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Shiue, S.M., Huang, L.J., Tsai, W.H. and Chen, Y.L., On Four Metaheuristic Applications to Speech Enhancement—Implementing Optimization Algorithms with MATLAB R2018a. In Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Computational Linguistics and Speech Processing (ROCLING 2018) 2018, 266-275.
  • Somauroo, A., &Bassoo, V, Energy-efficient genetic algorithm variants of PEGASIS for 3D wireless sensor networks. Applied Computing and Informatics. 2020
  • Orngreen, Rikke, and Karin Levinsen. "Workshops as a Research Methodology." Electronic Journal of E-learning 15, no. 1, 2017, pp 70-81.
  • Khan, A. R., Rakesh, N., Bansal, A., &Chaudhary, D. K.. Comparative study of WSN protocols (LEACH, PEGASIS and TEEN). Third International Conference on Image Information Processing (ICIIP) 2015, pp. 422-427.
  • Razaque, Abdul, MusbahAbdulgader, Chaitrali Joshi, FathiAmsaad, and MrunalChauhan. "PLEACH: energy efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks." IEEE Long Island Systems, Applications and Technology Conference (LISAT), 2016, pp. 1-5.
  • Saini, Parul, and Ajay K. Sharma. "E-DEECenhanced distributed energy efficient clustering scheme for heterogeneous WSN." First international conference on parallel, distributed and grid computing (PDGC 2010). 2010 IEEE.
  • K S Ananda Kumar., and R. Balakrishna. "Evaluation of Energy Consumption using Receiver–Centric MAC Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks." International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) 8, no. 1, 2018, pp 87-93.
  • Prasad, A. Y., and R. Balakrishna. "Implementation of optimal solution for network lifetime and energy consumption metrics using improved energy efficient LEACH protocol in MANET." Telkomnika 17, no. 4 2019, pp 17581766.
  • Hamdy H. El-Sayed, Hassan Shaban Hassan; Performance Comparison of Various Hierarchical WSN Routing Protocols, Int. J. Advanced Networking and Applications, Volume: 11 Issue: 02 , 2019, pp 4218-4223.
  • Sahar Alsafi, Samani A. Talab; Implementation of DEEC, DDEEC, EDEEC and TDEEC Protocols using MATLAB in Wireless Sensor Network; Int. J. Advanced Networking and Applications, Volume: 12 Issue: 03, 2020, pp 4596-4600.

Abstract Views: 107

PDF Views: 0




  • Performance Evaluation of LEACH, PEGASIS and TEEN Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks based on Network Lifetime

Abstract Views: 107  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Hebron Hailu Wodajo
School of Computing & Informatics, College of Engineering & Technology, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia

Abstract


With the advancement of technology in communication and electronic components, cheap and tiny microprocessors that are used to create wireless networks are becoming more readily available. The primary goal of this work is to compare the performance of various routing protocols chosen from wireless sensor networks (WSN) based on network lifetime. To do this, three well-known energy saving hierarchical routing protocols called Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy (LEACH), Power-Efficient Gathering in Sensor Information Systems (PEGASIS) and Threshold Sensitive Energy Efficient Sensor Network Protocol (TEEN) were selected for the study. Because these network protocols rely on hierarchical structures to function and save energy, they are fascinating to investigate. In this research, four-performance metrics considered namely number of nodes in alive, average energy dissipated, operating nodes per round and network lifetime. As a result, the researcher conducted a general analysis of the protocols in terms of performance metrics. The findings of the study show that among the three routing protocols, PEGASIS has longer network lifetime and lesser power consumption while LEACH has the least network lifetime and the highest power consumption. On the other hand, TEEN has been figured out that it has medium performance in terms of both power consumption and network lifetime. This shows that LEACH is ideal for small networks and can be preferable during critical times. Whereas, PEGASIS is ideal for large networks as it has efficient power consumption which results in longer network lifetime.

Keywords


Network Lifetime, Performance, Routing Protocol, Wireless Sensor Networks.

References