AIRCC's International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Exploration of the Factors Affecting Users' Satisfaction with Mobile Payments


Affiliations
1 Department of Information Management, I-Shou University, Taiwan, Province of China
 

Mobile payment allows consumers to make more flexible payments through convenient mobile devices. While mobile payment is easy and time save, the operation and security of mobile payment must ensure that the payment is fast, convenient, reliable and safety in order to increase the users' satisfaction. Therefore, this study based on technology acceptance model to explore the impact of external variables through perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on users' satisfaction. The data analysis methods used in this study are descriptive statistical analysis, reliability and validity analysis, Pearson correlation analysis and regression analysis to verify the hypotheses. The results show that all hypotheses are supported. However, mobile payment is still subject to many restrictions on development and there are limited related researches. The results of this study provided insight into the factors that affect the users' satisfaction for mobile payment. Related services development of mobile payment and future research suggestions are also offered.

Keywords

Mobile Payment, Technology Acceptance Model, Users’ Satisfaction.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Lu, H. P. and Su, Y. J. (2009). “Factors affecting purchase intention on mobile shopping web sites,” Internet Research, Vol.19, No. 4, pp. 442-458.

  • Zhang, R., Chen, J. Q., and Lee, C. J. (2013). “Mobile commerce and consumer privacy concerns,” The Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 31-38.

  • Kim, C., Mirusmonov, M., and Lee, I. (2010). “An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment,” Journal Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 310-322.

  • Nguyen, N., Cao, T. K., Dang, P. L. and Nguyen, H. A. (2016). “Predicting consumer intention to use mobile payment services: empirical evidence from Vietnam,” International Journal of Marketing Studies, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 117-124.

  • Pousttchi, K. and Wiedemann, D. G. (2007). “What influences consumers’ intention to use mobile payments?” Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a4dd/ce87edaa6d2bf14d0bd362e1c9beb24b030b.pdf (March, 22, 2017).

  • Ondrus, J. and Pigneur, Y. (2007). “Cross‐industry preferences for development of mobile payments in Switzerland,” Electronic Markets, pp. 142-152.

  • Liebana-Cabanillas, F., Ramos de Luna, I., and Montoro-Ríos, F. (2017). “Intention to use new mobile payment systems: a comparative analysis of SMS and NFC payments,” Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 892-910.

  • Dornan, A. (2001). “The essential guide to wireless communications applications: from cellular systems to WAP and m-commerce,” Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.

  • Heijden, H. (2002). “Factors affecting the successful introduction of mobile payment systems,” 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference eReality: Constructing the eEconomy, Bled, Slovenia, June 17-19, pp. 430-443.

  • Hahn I. and Kodó, K. (2017). “Mobile payment analysed from the aspects of Kano model.” Retrieved from: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1079862/FULLTEXT01.pdf (March, 22, 2017).

  • Dahlberg, T., Mallat, N., Ondrus, J., and Zmijewska, A. (2008). “Past, present and future of mobile payments research: a literature review,” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 165-181.

  • Varshney, U. (2002). “Mobile payment,” IEEE Computer, Vol. 35, No. 12, pp. 120-121.

  • Ondrus, J. and Pigneur, Y. (2006). “Towards a holistic analysis of mobile payments: a multiple perspectives approach,” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 246–257.

  • Sang, R. J. and Murdock, K. (2013). “Consumer acceptance of mobile marketing communications using the QR code,” Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 11-124.

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319-340.

  • Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). “Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research”. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  • Taylor, S. and Todd, P. (1995). “Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 561-570.

  • Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. W. (2003), “Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 51-90.

  • Moon, J.W. and Kim, Y.G. (2001). “Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context,” Information & Management, Vol. 38, pp. 217-230.

  • Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. (2000). “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies,” Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp.186-204.

  • Brown, L. G. (1989). “The strategic and tactical implications of convenience in consumer product marketing,” The Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 13-19.

  • Yoon, C. and Kim, S. (2007). “Convenience and TAM in a ubiquitous computing environment: the case of wireless LAN,” Electronic Commerce Research & Applications, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 102-112.

  • Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

  • Craig, V.S., France, B., and Christie, L.C. (2004), “Factors influencing the adoption of web based shopping: the impact of trust,” ACM SIGMIS Database, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 32-49.

  • Kim, E. and Tadisina, S. (2007). “A model of customers’ trust in e-businesses: Micro-level inter-party trust formation,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 88-104.

  • Kalakota, R. and Whinston, A. B. (1996). “Readings in Electronic Commerce” Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA.

  • Yoon, S. J. (2002). “The antecedents and consequences of trust in online-purchase decisions,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 47-63.

  • Dahlberg, T., Mallat, N., and Öörni, A. (2003). Trust enhanced technology acceptance model-consumer acceptance of mobile payment solutions: Tentative evidence, Stockholm Mobility Roundtable, 22-23.

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). “Psychometric theory,” New York: McGraw-Hill.


Abstract Views: 465

PDF Views: 240




  • An Exploration of the Factors Affecting Users' Satisfaction with Mobile Payments

Abstract Views: 465  |  PDF Views: 240

Authors

Lisa Y. Chen
Department of Information Management, I-Shou University, Taiwan, Province of China
Wan-Ning Wu
Department of Information Management, I-Shou University, Taiwan, Province of China

Abstract


Mobile payment allows consumers to make more flexible payments through convenient mobile devices. While mobile payment is easy and time save, the operation and security of mobile payment must ensure that the payment is fast, convenient, reliable and safety in order to increase the users' satisfaction. Therefore, this study based on technology acceptance model to explore the impact of external variables through perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on users' satisfaction. The data analysis methods used in this study are descriptive statistical analysis, reliability and validity analysis, Pearson correlation analysis and regression analysis to verify the hypotheses. The results show that all hypotheses are supported. However, mobile payment is still subject to many restrictions on development and there are limited related researches. The results of this study provided insight into the factors that affect the users' satisfaction for mobile payment. Related services development of mobile payment and future research suggestions are also offered.

Keywords


Mobile Payment, Technology Acceptance Model, Users’ Satisfaction.

References