AIRCC's International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Ensemble Learning Model for Screening Autism in Children


Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Science, Al Albayt University, Al Mafraq, Jordan
 

Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurological condition associated with communication, repetitive, and social challenges. ASD screening is the process of detecting potential autistic traits in individuals using tests conducted by a medical professional, a caregiver, or a parent. These tests often contain large numbers of items to be covered by the user and they generate a score based on scoring functions designed by psychologists and behavioural scientists. Potential technologies that may improve the reliability and accuracy of ASD tests are Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. This paper presents a new framework for ASD screening based on Ensembles Learning called Ensemble Classification for Autism Screening (ECAS). ECAS employs a powerful learning method that considers constructing multiple classifiers from historical cases and controls and then utilizes these classifiers to predict autistic traits in test instances. ECAS performance has been measured on a real dataset related to cases and controls of children and using different Machine Learning techniques. The results revealed that ECAS was able to generate better classifiers from the children dataset than the other Machine Learning methods considered in regard to levels of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Keywords

Artificial Neural Network, Autism Screening, Classification, Ensemble Learners, Predictive Models, Machine Learning.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Pennington, M. L., Cullinan, D., & Southern, L. B. (2014). Defining autism: variability in state education agency definitions of and evaluations for Autism Spectrum Disorders. Autism Research and Treatment, 1-8.

  • Thabtah, F. (2018A) Machine learning in autistic spectrum disorder behavioral research: A review and ways forward. Informatics for Health and Social Care 43 (2), 1-20.

  • Chu, K. C., Huang, H. J., & Huang, Y. S. (2016). Machine learning approach for distinction of ADHD and OSA. In Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on (pp. 1044-1049). IEEE.

  • Lopez Marcano, J. L. (2016). Classification of ADHD and non-ADHD Using AR Models and Machine Learning Algorithms (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech).

  • Duda M., Ma R., Haber N., Wall D.P. (2016). Use of machine learning for behavioral distinction of autism and ADHD. Translational Psychiatry (9(6), 732.

  • Bone, D., Goodwin, M. S., Black, M. P., Lee, C.-C., Audhkhasi, K., & Narayanan, S. (2016). Applying machine learning to facilitate autism diagnostics: pitfalls and promises. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1121–1136.

  • Thabtah F., Kamalov F., Rajab K. (2018) A new computational intelligence approach to detect autistic features for autism screening. International Journal of Medical Informatics, Volume 117, pp. 112-124.

  • Abbas, H., Garberson, F., Glover, E., & Wall, D. P. (2018). Machine learning approach for early detection of autism by combining questionnaire and home video screening. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(8), 1000-1007. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocy039

  • Altay, O., &Ulas, M. (2018). Prediction of the Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis with Linear Discriminant Analysis Classifier and K-Nearest Neighbor in Children. 2018 6th International Symposium on Digital Forensic and Security (ISDFS). Antalya, Turkey: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ISDFS.2018.8355354

  • Ravindranath, V., & Ra, S. (2018). A machine learning based approach to classify Autism with optimum behaviour sets. International Journal of Engineering and Technology. doi:10.14419/ijet.v7i3.18.14907

  • Thabtah F., Peebles D. (2019) A new machine learning model based on induction of rules for autism detection. Health Informatics Journal, 1460458218824711.

  • R. M. Mohammad, F. Thabtah and L. McCluskey, “Predicting Phishing Websites using Neural Network trained with Back-Propagation,” in ICAI, Las Vigas, 2013-C.

  • R. M. Mohammad, F. Thabtah and L. McCluskey, “Predicting phishing websites based on selfstructuring neural network,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 443-458, 2013B.

  • S. Madhusmita, S. K. Dash, S. Dash and A. Mohapatra, “An approach for iris plant classification using neural network,” International Journal on Soft Computing , vol. 3, no. 1, 2012.

  • F. Amato, A. López, E. M. Peña-Méndez, P. Vaňhara, A. Hampl and J. Havel, “Artificial neural networks in medical diagnosis,” Journal of Applied Biomedicine, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 47–58, 2013.

  • M. Riley, J. Karl and T. Chris, “A Study of Early Stopping, Ensembling, and Patchworking for Cascade Correlation Neural Networks,” IAENG International Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 307-316, 2010.

  • Thabtah, F. (2018). An accessible and efficient autism screening method for behavioural data and predictive analyses. Health Informatics Journal, 1-17. doi:10.1177/1460458218796636

  • Thabtah F., ASDTests. A mobile App for ASD Screening, (2017) (Accessed 14 March 2019), www.asdtests.com.

  • Ventola, P., Kleinman, J., Pandey, J., Barton, M., Allen, S., Green, J., . . . Fein, D. (2006). Agreement among four diagnostic instruments for autism spectrum disorders in toddlers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 839-47.

  • Vllasaliu, L., Jensen, K., Hoss, S., Landenberger, M., Menze, M., Schutz, M., . . . Freitag, C. M. (2016). Diagnostic instruments for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1-27.

  • Thabtah F. (2017) Autism Spectrum Disorder Tools: Machin Learning Adaptation and DSM-5 Fulfillment: An Investigative Study. Proceedings of the2017 International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics (ICMHI 2017), pp. 1-6. Taichung, Taiwan. ACM.

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2001). Take the AQ test. Journal of Autism and developmental disorders, 5-17.

  • Allison, C., Baron-Cohen, S., Charman, T., Wheelwright, S., Richler, J., Pasco, G., &Brayne, C. (2008). The Q-CHAT (quantitative checklist for autism in toddlers): a normally distributed quantitative measure of autistic traits at 18–24 months of age: preliminary report. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1414–1425.

  • Witten, I. and Frank, E. (2005). Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques.

  • Freund, Y. and Schapire, R.E., (1997) A Decision-Theoretic Generalization of On-Line Learning and an Application to Boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55(1), p.119–139.

  • Quinlan, J. (1986). Induction of Decision Trees. Mach. Learn. 1(1): 81-106.

  • Fusaroli, R., Lambrechts, A., Bang, D., Bowler, D. M., & Gaigg, S. B. (2017, March). “Is voice a marker for Autism spectrum disorder? A systematic review and meta‐analysis”. Autism Research, 10, 384-407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1678

  • Tariq, Q., Daniels, J., Schwartz, J. N., Washington, P., Kalantarian, H., & Wall, D. P. (2018, November 27). Mobile detection of autism through machine learning on home video: A development and prospective validation study. PLoS Med, 15(11). doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002705

  • Satu, S., Sathi, F. F., Arifen, S., & Ali, H. (January 2019). Early Detection of Autism by Extracting Features:A Case Study in Bangladesh. International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques. Dhaka. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330383730_Early_Detection_of_Autism_by_Extracting_Features_A_Case_Study_in_Bangladesh

  • Wong , V., Hui , L., Lee , W., Leung , L., Ho , P., Lau, W., . . . Chung, B. (2004). A modified screening tool for autism (Checklist for Autism in Toddlers [CHAT-23]) for Chinese children. Pediatrics, 166-76.

  • Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009). The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter, 11(1), 10-18.

  • Quinlan, J. (1993). C4.5: Programs for machine learning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

  • BreimanL. (2001) Random forests. Mach. Learning, 45(1):5-32, 2001. 1300

  • Friedman, N., Geiger, D. and Goldszmidt, M. (1997) Bayesian Network Classifiers. Machine Learning - Special issue on learning with probabilistic representations, 29(2-3), pp.131-63.

  • Bi, X.-a., Wang, Y., Shu, Q., Sun, Q., & Xu, Q. (2018). Classification of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Random Support Vector Machine Cluster. Frontiers in genetics, 9(18). doi:10.3389/fgene.2018.00018

  • Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., & Pickles, A. (2000). The Autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 205-223.

  • Schopler, E., Van Bourgondien, M. E., Wellman, J., & Love, S. R. (1980). Toward objective classification of childhood autism: childhood autism rating scale (cars). Autism DevDisord, 91–103.

  • Allison, C., Auyeung, B., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). Toward brief “red flags” for autism screening: the short autism spectrum quotient and the short quantitative checklist in 1,000 cases and 3,000 controls. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(2), 202-212.

  • Frank, E., and, Witten, I. (1998) Generating accurate rule sets without global optimisation. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, (p. . 144–151). Madison, Wisconsin.

  • Cohen, W. W. (1995). Fast effective rule induction. In Machine Learning Proceedings 1995 (pp. 115-123). Morgan Kaufmann.

  • Freund, Y., &Schapire, R. E. (1999). Large margin classification using the perceptron algorithm. Machine learning, 37(3), 277-296.

  • Abdelhamid, N., Thabtah, F.,and Abdel-jaber, H. (2017). Phishing detection: A recent intelligent machine learning comparison based on models content and features. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI), pp. 72-77. 2017/7/22, Beijing, China.

  • Abdelhamid N., Ayesh A., Thabtah F. (2013) Classification. Proceedings of the International conference on AI ‘2013, pp. 687-695. LV, USA. Associative Classification Mining for Website Phishing

  • Thabtah F., Hadi W., Abdelhamid N., Issa A. (2011) Prediction Phase in Associative Classification. Journal of Knowledge Engineering and Software Engineering. Volume: 21, Issue: 6(2011) pp. 855876. WorldScinet.

  • Thabtah F., Mahmood Q., McCluskey L., Abdel-jaber H (2010). A new Classification based on Association Algorithm. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, Vol 9, No. 1, pp. 5564. World Scientific.

  • Thabtah F., Cowling P., and Peng Y. (2006): Multiple Label Classification Rules Approach. Journal of Knowledge and Information System. Volume 9:109-129. Springer.


Abstract Views: 352

PDF Views: 149




  • Ensemble Learning Model for Screening Autism in Children

Abstract Views: 352  |  PDF Views: 149

Authors

Mofleh Al Diabat
Department of Computer Science, Al Albayt University, Al Mafraq, Jordan
Najah Al-Shanableh
Department of Computer Science, Al Albayt University, Al Mafraq, Jordan

Abstract


Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurological condition associated with communication, repetitive, and social challenges. ASD screening is the process of detecting potential autistic traits in individuals using tests conducted by a medical professional, a caregiver, or a parent. These tests often contain large numbers of items to be covered by the user and they generate a score based on scoring functions designed by psychologists and behavioural scientists. Potential technologies that may improve the reliability and accuracy of ASD tests are Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. This paper presents a new framework for ASD screening based on Ensembles Learning called Ensemble Classification for Autism Screening (ECAS). ECAS employs a powerful learning method that considers constructing multiple classifiers from historical cases and controls and then utilizes these classifiers to predict autistic traits in test instances. ECAS performance has been measured on a real dataset related to cases and controls of children and using different Machine Learning techniques. The results revealed that ECAS was able to generate better classifiers from the children dataset than the other Machine Learning methods considered in regard to levels of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Keywords


Artificial Neural Network, Autism Screening, Classification, Ensemble Learners, Predictive Models, Machine Learning.

References