The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off


Many runners use watches incorporating Global Positioning System technology to track their workouts. These devices can be valuable training aids, but they have limitations. For several reasons including variations in satellite position, environmental factors, and design decisions made by the manufacturer, GPS-enabled watches can produce position measurement errors. These can result in incorrect estimations of total distance covered as well as running pace. This study examined the accuracy of three Garmin running watches of different technological generations using repetitive trials, over several years, by the same runner over the same route. The older watches, a Forerunner 205 and a Forerunner 220, showed similar accuracy when traversing the route. The newer generation watch, a Forerunner 45S, was found to be significantly less accurate in terms of both the trueness and precision of its distance measurements. This may indicate that Garmin, in competition with other manufacturers of similar devices, has chosen in recent years to prioritize device miniaturization and battery life over accuracy.

Keywords

GPS, Running Watch, Sports Watch, Garmin Forerunner, Wearable Technology.
User
Notifications
Font Size