The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off


Objectives: To compare the shear-peel band strength of untreated (non-sandblasted) and sandblasted orthodontic bands using two conventional glass ionomer cements-KetacTM-Cem Radiopaque (3M, ESPE) and GC Gold Label Type-1 (GC, Corporation). Methodology: 50 freshly extracted human mandibular third molars were selected and randomly assigned groups of 25 sample each for specific cements with and without sandblasting. Shear-peel band strength in megapascals were obtained by debanding the cemented bands for each group's specimen using an Instron Universal Testing Machine. Data was analyzed with ANOVA followed by a Tukey test. Results: An increase of 72.4% in the retentive strength was observed with sandblasted orthodontic bands cemented with KetacTMCem and about 76.2% of retentive strength with sandblasted one cemented with GC type-1 glass ionomer cement in comparison to untreated bands. Conclusion: Statistically significant differences were noted between non-sandblasted and sandblasted bands groups. The retentive force was increased to almost three quarter folds with sandblasted bands, irrespective of cement used.

Keywords

Orthodontic Bands, Glass Ionomer Cements, Shear Peel Strength, Sand-Blast.
User
Notifications
Font Size