![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_open_medium.gif)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_restricted_medium.gif)
An Improved Segmentation Method for Brain Cancer Using Capsule Neural Networks
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Brain cancer is a life-threatening disease that requires accurate and efficient segmentation methods for effective diagnosis and treatment planning. In this study, we propose an improved segmentation method for brain cancer using Capsule Neural Networks (CapsNets). CapsNets are a promising alternative to traditional convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as they capture spatial relationships between features more effectively. However, existing CapsNet-based segmentation methods suffer from limitations such as low segmentation accuracy and high computational complexity. To address these limitations, we introduce an improved CapsNet architecture that incorporates dynamic routing and attention mechanisms. The dynamic routing algorithm enhances the routing process between capsules, allowing for better feature representation and improved segmentation accuracy. Additionally, the attention mechanism focuses the network’s attention on important regions, reducing the computational complexity without sacrificing segmentation quality. We evaluate the proposed method on a publicly available brain cancer dataset and compare its performance against state-of-the-art segmentation approaches. The experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves superior segmentation accuracy and outperforms existing methods in terms of Dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance. Furthermore, our method demonstrates faster convergence and reduced computational complexity compared to previous CapsNet-based approaches. In conclusion, this study presents an improved segmentation method for brain cancer using Capsule Neural Networks. The proposed method addresses the limitations of existing CapsNet-based approaches by incorporating dynamic routing and attention mechanisms. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of our method, showcasing superior segmentation accuracy and reduced computational complexity. The improved segmentation method has the potential to enhance the diagnosis and treatment planning of brain cancer, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes.
Keywords
Brain, Segmentation, Capsule Network, Capsules.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- N. Gordillo, E. Montseny and P. Sobrevilla, “State of the Art Survey on MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation”, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 1426-1438, 2013.
- B.H. Menze, A. Jakab, S. Bauer, J. Kalpathy-Cramer, K. Farahani, J. Kirby, Y. Burren, N. Porz, J. Slotboom and R. Wiest, “The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 34, No. 10, pp. 1993-2024, 2015.
- F. Dong and J. Peng, “Brain MR Image Segmentation based on Local Gaussian Mixture Model and Nonlocal Spatial Regularization”, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 827-839, 2014.
- N. Boughattas, M. Berar, K. Hamrouni and S. Ruan, “A ReLearning based Post-Processing Step for Brain Tumor Segmentation from Multi Sequence Images”, International Journal of Image Processing, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 50-62, 2016.
- S.S. Mankikar, “A Novel Hybrid Approach using K means Clustering and Threshold Filter for Brain Tumor Detection”, International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 206-209, 2013.
- J.J. Corso, E. Sharon, S. Dube, S. El-Saden, U. Sinha and A. Yuille, “Efficient Multilevel Brain Tumor Segmentation with Integrated Bayesian Model Classification”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 629-640, 2008.
- M. Fernandez Delgado, E. Cernadas, S. Barro and D. Amorim, “Do We Need Hundreds of Classifiers to Solve Real World Classification Problems”, Journal of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 3133-3181, 2014.
- J. Khan, J.S. Wei and M. Ringner, “Classification and Diagnostic Prediction of Cancers using Gene Expression Profiling and Artificial Neural Networks”, Nature Medicine, Vol. 7, pp. 673-679, 2001.
- K. Jong, J. Mary, A. Cornuejols, E. Marchiori and M. Sebag, “Ensemble Feature Ranking”, Proceedings of European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp. 1-6, 2004.
- F. Leroy, J.F. Mangin, F. Rousseau, H. Glasel and L.H. Pannier, “Atlas-Free Surface Reconstruction of the Cortical Grey-White Interface in Infants”, PLoS One, Vol. 6, No. 11, pp. 1-15, 2011.
- V. Srhoj-Egekher and K.J. Kersbergen KJ, “Automatic Segmentation of Neonatal Brain MRI using Atlas based Segmentation and Machine Learning Approach”, Proceedings of International Conference on Neonatal Brain Segmentation, pp. 22-27,2012.
- S.M. Smith, “Fast Robust Automated Brain Extraction”, Human Brain Mapping, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 143-155, 2002.
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/abstractview.png)
Abstract Views: 131
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/pdfview.png)
PDF Views: 0