Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Automobile Bonus-malus System Modelling Using Machine Learning Algorithms


Affiliations
1 Department of Statistics and Mathematics Applied to Economics and Management, University Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Third-party liability is the most important sub-category in automobile insurance, that is why actuaries seek always to design the ideal price list by classifying the insureds into homogeneous classes. However, the heterogeneity persists in the priori tariffication. For that, actuaries use the Bonus Malus system to redistribute the cost of claims more equitably between insureds by rewarding good insureds with a bonus and penalizing bad insureds with a Malus. Nevertheless, the classical approach used in the conception of Bonus Malus systems is limited to the parametric methods that need to make the hypothesis of the number of claims distribution and don’t consider the cost of claims. In this direction, this paper seeks to avoid this issue by using machine learning algorithms, in response to offering a fair Bonus Malus System. Two models of posteriori tariffication will be built. In addition, three algorithms will be used, in occurrence, the CART Classification And Regression Tree method, SVM the Support Vector Machine for regression, and KNN the K-Nearest Neighbor. The suggested models take into account, not only the number of claims but also the importance of the cost of claims. A numerical illustration shows the flexibility of posteriori premiums calculated by our models in relation to the risk levels. This work is a start for new actuarial research which seeks to use artificial intelligence in the design of bonus malus systems.

Keywords

Bonus-Malus System, Machine Learning, Posteriori Tariffication, Priori Tariffication, Automobile Insurance.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • C. Vatter, “Simulation of Automobile Insurance Bonus-Malus Systems”, American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, Vol. 17, No. 3-4, pp. 329-368, 1997.
  • J. Lemaire, “Bonus-Malus Systems: The European and Asian Approach to Merit-Rating”, North American Actuarial Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 26-38, 1998.
  • M. Denuit, X. Marechal and J.F. Walhin, “Bonus-Malus Scales”, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 2007.
  • G. Dionne and C. Vanasse, “Automobile Insurance Ratemaking in the Presence of Asymmetrical Information”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 149-165, 1992.
  • I. Morillo and L. Bermudez, “Bonus-Malus System using an Exponential Loss Function with an Inverse Gaussian Distribution”, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 49-57, 2003.
  • D. Pierre-Loti-Viaud, “Parametric Credibility, Correlation and Bonus-Malus Pricing”, Comptes Rendus Mathematique, Vol. 339, No. 4, pp. 283-286, 2004.
  • S. Pitrebois, M. Denuit and J.F. Walhin, “Multi-Event Bonus-Malus Scales”, Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 517-528, 2006.
  • G.R. Guerreiro, J.T. Mexia and M. De Fatima Miguens, “Statistical Approach for Open Bonus Malus”, Astin Bulletin, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 63-83, 2014.
  • R. A. Inoussa, “Statistical Approach to the Calibration of Bonus-Malus Systems in Automobile Insurance”, Master Thesis, Department of Computer Science, Universite Du Quebec A Montreal, pp. 1-124, 2013.
  • W. Ni, C. Constantinescu and A.A. Pantelous, “Bonus-Malus Systems with Weibull Distributed Claim Severities”, Annals of Actuarial Science, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 217-228, 2014.
  • W. Ni, B. Li, C. Constantinescu and A.A. Pantelous, “Bonus-Malus Systems with Hybrid Claim Severity Distributions”, Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk, Vol. 45, pp. 1-14, 2014.
  • E. Gomez-Deniz, “Bivariate Credibility Bonus-Malus Premiums Distinguishing between Two Types of Claims”, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Vol. 70, pp. 117-124, 2016.
  • G. Tzougas, S. Vrontos and N. Frangos, “Bonus-Malus Systems with Two-Component Mixture Models Arising from Different Parametric Families”, North American Actuarial Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 55-91, 2018.
  • R. Oh, P. Shi and J.Y. Ahn, “Bonus-Malus Premiums under the Dependent Frequency-Severity Modeling”, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Vol. 2020, No. 3, pp. 172-195, 2020.
  • R. Norberg, “A Credibility Theory for Automobile Bonus Systems”, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Vol. 1976, No. 2, pp. 92-107, 1976.
  • A. Charpentier and M. Denuit, “Mathematics of Non-Life Insurance: Volume 2, Pricing and Provisioning”, Paris: Economica Publisher, 2005.

Abstract Views: 59

PDF Views: 2




  • Automobile Bonus-malus System Modelling Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Abstract Views: 59  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Kouach Yassine
Department of Statistics and Mathematics Applied to Economics and Management, University Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco
EL Attar Abderrahim
Department of Statistics and Mathematics Applied to Economics and Management, University Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco
EL Hachloufi Mostafa
Department of Statistics and Mathematics Applied to Economics and Management, University Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco

Abstract


Third-party liability is the most important sub-category in automobile insurance, that is why actuaries seek always to design the ideal price list by classifying the insureds into homogeneous classes. However, the heterogeneity persists in the priori tariffication. For that, actuaries use the Bonus Malus system to redistribute the cost of claims more equitably between insureds by rewarding good insureds with a bonus and penalizing bad insureds with a Malus. Nevertheless, the classical approach used in the conception of Bonus Malus systems is limited to the parametric methods that need to make the hypothesis of the number of claims distribution and don’t consider the cost of claims. In this direction, this paper seeks to avoid this issue by using machine learning algorithms, in response to offering a fair Bonus Malus System. Two models of posteriori tariffication will be built. In addition, three algorithms will be used, in occurrence, the CART Classification And Regression Tree method, SVM the Support Vector Machine for regression, and KNN the K-Nearest Neighbor. The suggested models take into account, not only the number of claims but also the importance of the cost of claims. A numerical illustration shows the flexibility of posteriori premiums calculated by our models in relation to the risk levels. This work is a start for new actuarial research which seeks to use artificial intelligence in the design of bonus malus systems.

Keywords


Bonus-Malus System, Machine Learning, Posteriori Tariffication, Priori Tariffication, Automobile Insurance.

References