Open Access
Subscription Access
Influence of Flexible Bodies in Military Tracked Vehicle Dynamics
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Tracked vehicles are meant to be used in the harsh cross country environment. In particular, the military tracked vehicles are highly exposed to severe terrains and critical handling conditions. Yet while carrying out the dynamic studies, the tracked vehicles, in general, are modeled as rigid bodies. Hence in this article, an attempt has been made to understand closely the dynamics of a tracked vehicle with the inclusion of some parts of the tracked vehicle viz., hull side plates and road wheel arms, as flexible bodies in the dynamic analysis using the finite element method. Result of the flexible dynamic simulation is also compared with the tracked vehicle analysis with the same parts modeled as rigid bodies. In this investigation, dimensions of the standard staggered trapezoidal blocks terrain meant for testing the tracked vehicles is used to carry out the dynamic studies on the tracked vehicle. The dynamic simulation result of the flexible tracked vehicle model is also compared with the experimental test result of the actual tracked vehicle conducted in the actual trapezoidal blocks terrain.
Keywords
Tracked Vehicle Dynamics, Flexible Body, Rigid Body, Finite Element Method, Road Wheel Arm, Side Plate.
User
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
Font Size
Information
- D. Rubinstein and N. Galili. 1994. REKEM - A design-oriented simulation program for off-road track vehicle, J. Terramechanics, 31(5), 329-352.
- A. Dhir and S. Sankar. 1995. Assessment of tracked vehicle suspension system using a validated computer simulation model, J. Terramechanics, 32(3), 127-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-4898(95)00012-7.
- Z.D. Ma and N.C. Perkins. 2002. A track-wheel-terrain interaction model for dynamic simulation of tracked vehicles, Vehicle System Dynamics, 37(6), 401-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/vesd.37.6.401.3522.
- D.L.D. H. Hodges and M.J. Patil. 2002. Multi-flexible-body dynamic analysis of horizontal axis wind turbines, Wind Energy, 5(4), 281-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/we.66.
- S. Dietz, O. Wallrapp and S. Wiedemann. 2003. Nodal Vs Modal Representation in Flexible Multibody System Dynamics, Report on Multibody Dynamics.
- J. Yamakawa and K. Watanabe. 2004. A spatial motion analysis model of tracked vehicles with torsion bar type suspension, J. Terramechanics, 41(2-3), 113-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2004.02.007.
- S. Park, A.A. Popov and D.J. Cole. 2004. Influence of soil deformation on off-road heavy vehicle suspension vibration, J. Terramechanics, 41(1), 41-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2004.02.010.
- P.S. Els. 2005. The applicability of ride comfort standards to off-road vehicles, J. Terramechanics, 42(1), 47-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2004.08.001.
- S. Al-Milli, K. Althoefer and L.D. Seneviratne. 2007. Dynamic analysis and traversability prediction of tracked vehicles on soft terrain, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf., London, U.K. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icnsc.2007.372791.
- P.F. Carlbom. 2001. Combining MBS with FEM for rail vehicle dynamics analysis, Multibody System Dynamics, 6(3), 291-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1012072405882.
- R.N. Jazar. 2008. Vehicle Dynamics: Theory and Applications, Springer Science+Business Media, 827-877.
Abstract Views: 464
PDF Views: 240