Open Access
Subscription Access
Using Real-Time Data for Increasing the Efficiency of the Automated Fibre Placement Process
Subscribe/Renew Journal
The Automated Fibre Placement (AFP) process has grown in popularity with an increasing install base that realistically began within the last decade. This growing popularity stems from the technique’s promise of higher deposition rates (>10kg/hr), enhanced quality, and reduction of intensive manual labour. However, AFP machines are still relatively few in number as compared to other automated routes for fabrication; with only a few airframers and suppliers proactively developing the technique. The purpose of this paper is to report on the non-value adding activities that detrimentally impact on production rate capability. For example, inspection is typically carried out manually and can account for a large percentage of the cycle time. The risk therefore, is that by not adequately addressing non-value adding activities, a costly level of investment could be needed to achieve the production rates required. We provide a longitudinal case study, accounting for the non-value adding tasks that surround the process. Our results show that, by percentage, these activities have been targeted and reduced over a two year period. We are also able to demonstrate, through coefficient of variation, how the AFP process has stabilized over the two years. A 92% learning curve has emerged that better represents cycle time reductions for each successive part, as opposed to the 80% learning curve traditionally adopted.
Keywords
Automated Fibre Placement, Automation, Composite, Process, Efficiency.
User
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
Font Size
Information
- G. Marsh. 2008. Airbus Takes on Boeing With Composite A350 XWB, http://www.reinforced plastics.com/view/1106/airbus-takes-on-boeing-withcomposite-a350-xwb.
- G. Marsh. 2010. Airbus A350 XWB update, Reinforced Plastics, 54(6), 20-24.
- G. Marsh. 2010. Wing worker for the world, Reinforced Plastics, 54(3), 24-28.
- J. Cornforth. 2009. http://www.aero-mag.com/features Z /38/200910/62.
- B.W. Oppenheim. 2004. Lean product development flow, Systems Engineering, 7(4), 352376. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20014.
- B. Haque and M. James-Moore. 2004. Applying lean thinking to new product introduction, J. Engineering Design, 15(1), 1-31.
- N. Azizian, S. Sarkani and T. Mazzuchi. 2009. A comprehensive review and analysis of maturity assessment approaches for improved decision support to achieve efficient defence acquisition, Proc. World Congress on Engg. and Comp. Sci., San Francisco, USA.
- A. Tetlay and P. John. 2009. Determining the lines of system maturity, system readiness and capability readiness in the system development lifecycle, Proc. 7th Annual Conf. on Systems Engg. Research, Loughborough University, UK.
- D.M. Dietrich and E.A. Cudney. 2011. Methods and considerations for the development of emerging manufacturing technologies into a global aerospace supply chain, Int. J. Prod. Research, 49(10), 2819-2831.
- T.P. Wright. 1936. Factors affecting the cost of airplanes, J. Aeronautical Sciences, 3(4), 122-128.
- P. Hines, M. Holweg and N. Rich. 2004. Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinking, Int. J.Operations & Prod. Management, 24(10), 994-1011.
- J.P. Womack and D.T. Jones. 2003. Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, Free Press, New York.
Abstract Views: 371
PDF Views: 149