International Journal of Vehicle Structures and Systems

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Analysis of Dissimilar Metal Welding of EN19 and SS304L


Affiliations
1 Jain University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Dept. of Mech., Engg., Bangalore Institute of Tech., V.V. Puram, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
3 Dept. of Mech. Engg., PESIT, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
4 Dept. of Mech. Engg., HKBK College of Engg., Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
5 Poornaprajna Scientific Research Institute, Bidalur Post, Devanahalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
 

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Dissimilar welding between low carbon steel and austenitic stainless steel using both Tungsten inert gas and metal inert gas welding has been reported. However, the combination of SS304 and mild steel has less tensile strength in both TIG and MIG welding. Therefore, this study is undertaken with the objective of finding the weld strength of EN19 and SS304L using TIG and MIG welding with different parameters. Tensile strength and hardness of the welded region is found to be higher than that of the base material. The comparison of microstructure near the weld pool and the base material revealed the changes in composition of materials besides the formation of marten site in the welded region. The main application of this material thus prepared by welding processes could be in automobile industries, food industries and nuclear pressure vessels.

Keywords

Austenitic Chromium-Nickel Stainless Steel, Inert Gas Welding, TIG Welding, Mechanical Properties, Microstructure.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • A.K. Hussain, A. Lateef, M.D. Javed and T. Pramesh. 2010. Influence of welding speed on tensile strength of welded joint in TIG welding process, Int. J. Appl. Engg. Res., 1(3), 518-527.

  • R. Singh and S.S. Dhami. 2014. Analysis of defects in metal inert gas welding of A312tp316l stainless steel pipe using Taguchi optimization method and testing, Int. J. Eng. Sci., 3(6), 11-22.

  • K. Abbasi, S. Alam and M.I. Khan. 2011. An experimental study on the effect of increased pressure on MIG welding arc, Int. J. Appl. Engg. Res., 2, 22-27.

  • I.S. Kim, K.J. Son, Y.S. Yang and P.K.D.V. Yaragada. 2003. Sensitivity analysis for process parameters in GMA welding processes using a factorial design method, Int. J. Machine Tools & Manuf., 43(8), 763-769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00054-3

  • R. Sathish, B. Naveen, P. Nijanthan, A.K. Vasantha and G.V. Seshagiri Rao. 2012. Weldability and process parameter optimization of dissimilar pipe joints using GTAW, Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl., 2(3), 2525-2530.

  • L.S. Kumar, S.M. Verma, P.R. Prasad, P.K. Kumar and T.S. Shanker. 2011. Experimental investigation for welding aspects of AISI 304 & 316 by Taguchi technique for the process of TIG & MIG welding, Int. J. Engg. Trends and Tech., 2(2), 28-33.

  • H. Naffakh, M. Shamaniana, F. Ashrafizadeh. 2009. Dissimilar welding of AISI 310 austenitic stainless steel to nickel-based alloy Inconel 657, J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 209, 3628-3639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.08.019.

  • B.I. Mendoza, Z.C. Maldonado, H.A. Albiter and P.E. Robles. 2010. Dissimilar welding of super duplex stainless steel/HSLA steel for offshore applications joined by GTAW, Scientific Res., 2(7), 520-528.

  • J. Pasupathy and V. Ravisankar. 2013. Detailed study on dissimilar welding of low carbon steel with AA1050 using TIG welding, Int. J. Eng. Res. Tech., 2(11), 1588-1594.

  • D. Mishra, M.K. Vignesh, B.G. Raj, P. Srungavarapu, K.D. Ramkumar, N. Arivazhagan and S. Narayanan. 2014. Mechanical characterization of Monel 400 and 316 stainless steel weld-ments, Proc. Engg., 75, 24-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.11.005.

  • H. Pouraliakbar, M. Hamedi, A.H. Kokabi and A. Nazari. 2014. Designing of CK45 carbon steel and AISI 304 stainless steel dissimilar welds, Mater. Res., 17(1), 106-114. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392013005000170.

  • R.R. Mishra, V.K. Tiwari and S. Rajesha. 2014. A study of tensile strength of MIG and TIG welded dissimilar joints of mild steel and stainless steel, Int. J. Appl. Manage. Sci. Engg., 3, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.14810/ijamse.2014.3203.

  • R. Kaçar and O. Baylan. 2004. An investigation of microstructure/property relationships in dissimilar welds between martensitic and austenitic stainless steels, Mater. Des., 25, 317-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2003.10.010.

  • V.V. Satyanarayana, G.M. Reddy and T. Mohandas. 2005. Dissimilar metal friction welding of austeniticferritic stainless steels, J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 160, 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.05.017.

  • N. Arivazhagan, S. Singh, S. Prakash and G.M. Reddy. 2011. Investigation on AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel to AISI 4140 low alloy steel dissimilar joints by gas tungsten arc, electron beam and friction welding, Mater. Des., 32, 3036-3050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.037.

  • J. Luo, H.B. Leng, J.F. Xiang, X.M. Wang, D.J. Liu and Y.J. Long. 2011. Study on the new joining technology of aluminum alloy/Q235 steel dissimilar metal by the longitudinal electromagnetic hybrid TIG welding-brazing method, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Mechanic Automation and Control Engg., Inner Mangolia, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/MACE.2011.5987283.

  • J. Wang, M.X. Lu, L. Zhang, W. Chang, L.N. Xu and L.H. Hu. 2012. Effect of welding process on the microstructure and properties of dissimilar weld joints between low alloy steel and duplex stainless steel, Int. J. Min. Metallurg. Mater., 19(6), 518-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-012-0589-z.

  • Z. Boumerzoug, C. Derfouf and T. Baudin. 2010. Effect of welding on microstructure and mechanical properties of an industrial low carbon steel, Scientific Res., 2(7), 502-506. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2010.27066.

  • P. Kumar, K.P. Kolhe, S.J. Morey and C.K. Datta. 2011. Process parameters optimization of an aluminum alloy with pulsed gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) using gas mixtures, Mater. Sci. Applic., 2, 251-257.

  • P.D. Babu, G.N. Buvanashekaran, R. Karupuudaiyar and Balasubramanian. 2012. Experimental studies on the microstructure and hardness of laser transformation hardening of low alloy steel, Trans. CSME, 36(3), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.1139/tcsme-2012-0018.

  • J.S. Chen, Y. Lu, X.R. Li and Y.M. Zhang. 2012. Gas tungsten arc welding using an arcing wire, American Welding Soc. Welding Res. Council, 91, 195-203.

  • M.I. Rani and R.N. Marpu. 2012. Effect of pulsed current TIG welding parameters on mechanical properties of J-joint strength of AA 6351, Int. J. Engg., 1, 1-5.

  • K.S. Prasad, C.S.S. Rao and D.N. Rao. 2012. Study on factors effecting weld pool geometry of pulsed current micro plasma arc welded AISI 304L austenitic stainless steel sheets using statistical approach, J. Min. Mater. Char. Engg., 1(11), 790-799. https://doi.org/10.4236 /jmmce.2012.118068.

  • A. Raveendra and B.V.R. Ravi Kumar. 2013. Effect of pulsed current on welding characteristics of EN19 alloy steel using gas tungsten arc welding, Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Tech., 2(5), 1359-1367.

  • T. Ibrahim, D.S. Yawas and S.Y. Aku. 2013. Effects of gas metal arc welding techniques on the mechanical properties of duplex stainless steel, J. Min. Mater. Char. Engg., 1, 222-230. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2013.15035.

  • S.K. Khotiyan and Sandeep Kumar. 2014. Investigation of microstructure and mechanical properties of TIG and MIG welding using aluminium alloy, Int. J. Edu. Sci. Res. Review, 1(5), 90-96.

  • A. Prakash, R.K. Bag, P. Ohdar and S.S. Raju. 2016. Parametric optimization of metal inert gas welding by using Taguchi approach, Int. J. Res. Engg. Tech., 5 (2), 176-182. https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2016.0502030.

  • R. Dehmolaei, M. Shamanian and A. Kermanpur. 2008. Microstructural characterization of dissimilar welds between alloy 800 and HP heat-resistant steel, Mater. Char., 59, 1447-1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2008.01.013.

  • H. Naffakh, M. Shamaniana and F. Ashrafizadeh. 2010. Microstructural evolutions in dissimilar welds between AISI 310 austenitic stainless steel and Inconel 657, J. Mater. Sci., 45, 2564-2573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4227-8.

  • C.C. Silva, H.C. Miranda, H.B. de Sant’Ana and J.P. Farias. 2013. Austenitic and ferritic stainless steel dissimilar weld metal evaluation for the applications ascoating in the petroleum processing equipment, Mater Des., 47, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.048.

  • Vikas, Shashikant, A.K. Roy and K. Kumar. 2014. Effect and optimization of machine process parameters on MRR for EN19 & EN41 materials using Taguchi, Proc. Tech., 14, 204-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.08.027.

  • M. Saini, N. Arora, C. Pandey and H. Mehdi. 2014. Mechanical properties of bimetallic weld joint between Sa 516 grade 65 carbon steel and SS304 L for steam generator application, Int. J. Res. Engg. Tech., 3(7), 39-42. https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2014.0307007.

  • V. Chauhan and R.S. Jadoun. 2014. Parametric optimization of MIG welding for stainless steel (SS-304) and low carbon steel using Taguchi design method, Int. J. Adv. Tech. Engg. Res., Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Research in Sci., Engg. & Management, 224-229.

  • V. Chauhan and R.S. Jadoun. 2015. Parametric optimization of MIG welding for stainless steel (SS-304) and low carbon steel using Taguchi design method, Int. J. Recent Scientific Research, 6(2), 2662-2666.

  • G. Lokesh Kumar, P. Karthikeyan, C.N. Raj, B. Prasanna and G. Oliver. 2015. Microstructure and mechanical properties of ASS (304)-FSS (430) dissimilar joints in SMAW & GTAW processes, Int. J. Engg. Sci. Res. Tech., 4(9), 367-378.


Abstract Views: 348

PDF Views: 156




  • Analysis of Dissimilar Metal Welding of EN19 and SS304L

Abstract Views: 348  |  PDF Views: 156

Authors

G. T. Gopalakrishna
Jain University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
B. S. Ajay Kumar
Dept. of Mech., Engg., Bangalore Institute of Tech., V.V. Puram, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
K. R. Vishnu
Dept. of Mech. Engg., PESIT, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
S. D. Sundareshan
Dept. of Mech. Engg., HKBK College of Engg., Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
K. G. Satyanarayana
Poornaprajna Scientific Research Institute, Bidalur Post, Devanahalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Abstract


Dissimilar welding between low carbon steel and austenitic stainless steel using both Tungsten inert gas and metal inert gas welding has been reported. However, the combination of SS304 and mild steel has less tensile strength in both TIG and MIG welding. Therefore, this study is undertaken with the objective of finding the weld strength of EN19 and SS304L using TIG and MIG welding with different parameters. Tensile strength and hardness of the welded region is found to be higher than that of the base material. The comparison of microstructure near the weld pool and the base material revealed the changes in composition of materials besides the formation of marten site in the welded region. The main application of this material thus prepared by welding processes could be in automobile industries, food industries and nuclear pressure vessels.

Keywords


Austenitic Chromium-Nickel Stainless Steel, Inert Gas Welding, TIG Welding, Mechanical Properties, Microstructure.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.10.4.03