Open Access
Subscription Access
Analysis and Prediction of Performance of MR Damper at Different Currents and Control Strategies for Quarter Suspension System of a Roadway Vehicle
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Ride comfort and vehicle handling are the two major issues to be dealt in the design of suspension systems of automobiles. With passive systems offering contrariety on these two parameters, the alternative systems are being in study. Magnetorheological (MR) damper, a most feasible semi-active device, is one such alternative, which will offer the advantage of dealing with both these issues overcoming contrariety. In this study, the suspension system of a car using MR damper is analysed at 5 different currents viz., 0A, 0.25A, 0.5A, 0.75A, 1A, using 2DOF quarter car model and 4DOF half car models for ride comfort and handling and the comparisons of these are done with same suspension system equipped with regular passive damper. A MR damper is built-up using MR fluid consisting of carbonyl iron powder and silicone oil added with additive. Further, the characteristic of this damper is established by conducting experiments, which in turn is used to identify the parameters of Spencer model for MR damper. Using Spencer model of MR damper, at 5 different currents, the quarter car and half car models of vehicle suspension system are simulated by implementing a semi-active suspension system for analysing the resulting displacement and acceleration in the car body. The ride comfort and vehicle handling performance of each specific vehicle model with passive suspension system are compared with corresponding skyhook, ground hook and hybrid based semi-active suspension systems. The simulation and analysis are carried out using Matlab/Simulink.
Keywords
Magnetorheological Dampers, Semi Active Suspension Systems, Spencer Model, Skyhook, Ground Hook Hybrid Control.
User
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
Font Size
Information
- D. Ryba. 1974. Improvements in dynamic characteristics of automobile suspension systems part 1. Two-mass systems, Vehicle System Dynamics, 3(1), 17-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423117408968445.
- R. Rajalakshmi, S. Rajeshkumar, J. Thiyagarajan, A. Vinothkumar. 2017. Evaluation of human exposure to vibration subjected to active suspension actuators, Int. J. Vehicle Structures & Systems, 9(2), 68-71. https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.9.2.01.
- J. Wang and G. Meng. 2001. Magnetorheological fluid devices: principles, characteristics and applications in mechanical engineering, IMAHE, J. Materials: Design & Applications, Part L, 215(3), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1243/1464420011545012.
- R. Turczyn and M. Kciuk. 2008. Preparation and study of model magnetorheological fluids, J. Achievements in Materials and Manuf. Engg., 27(2), 131-134.
- M. Jolly, J.W. Bender and J.D. Carlson. 1998. Properties and applications of commercial magnetorheological fluids, Proc. SPIE 5th Annual Int. Symp. Smart Structures and Materials, San Diego.
- Jr.B.F. Spencer, S. Dyke, M. Sain and J. Carlson. 1997. Phenomenological model for magnetorheological dampers, J. Engg. Mech., 1-23.
- D.V.A.R. Sastry, K.V. Ramana, N.M. Rao, P. Pruthvi and D.U.V. Santhosh. 2016. Analysis of MR damper for quarter and half car suspension systems of a roadway vehicle, Int. J. Vehicle Structures & Systems, 9(1), 17-22.http://dx.doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.9.1.04.
- V.K. Grag and R.V. Dukkipati. 1984.Dynamics of Railway Vehicle Systems, Academic Press Inc.
- D. Karnopp, J. Crosby and R. Harwood. 1973. Vibration Control using Semi-Active Force Generators, Lord Library of Technical Articles, LL-7004.
- S.B. Choi, W. Li, M. Yu, H. Du, J. Fu and P.X. Do. 2016. State of the art of control schemes for smart systems featuring magneto-rheological materials, Smart Mater. Struct., 25. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/4/043001.
- S.M. Savaresi and C. Spelta. 2007. Mixed sky-hook and approaching the filtering limits of a semi-active suspension,J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 129, 382-392. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2745846.
Abstract Views: 727
PDF Views: 218