International Journal of Vehicle Structures and Systems

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Analysis of Synchronous Moment for Active Front Steering and a Two Actuated Wheels of Electric Vehicle Based on Dynamic Stability Enhancement


Affiliations
1 Dept. of Automotive and Tractors Engg., Mataria, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
2 Automotive Engg. Dept., Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
 

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Active Front Steering (AFS) and Direct Yaw moment Controller (DYC) are the vehicle smart systems to improve the vehicle stability and safety. The AFS uses front wheels Steer-By-Wire (SBW) system. DYC uses Rear Independent in Wheel Actuated Electric Vehicles (RIWA-EVs). It generates yaw moment to correct the vehicle state deviations. The proposed controller algorithm consists of two levels. First level feedback controller evaluate the optimal yaw moment generated to achieve the desired vehicle trajectory motion with minimize the yaw rate and side-slip errors. The second level controller is utilized to allocate the required front steer angle and traction/ regeneration to the RIWA embedded in rear wheels by taking into account the tire slip. An optimal Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) controller is designed, and its controller effectiveness is evaluated under various input driving manoeuvres. The results indicate that the integrated AFS/DYC can significantly stabilize the vehicle motion and highly reduce the driver’s workload. The laboratory experiment of AFS subsystem, for adequate actual front steering angle is measured, in order to apply in vehicle model to predict the responses. The results disclose that the RMS can be an effective route to monitor the vehicle stability.

Keywords

Vehicle Motion Stability, In-Wheel Actuated Electric Vehicle, Steering Systems, Optimal LQR Control.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • C.C. Chan. 2007. The state of the art of electric, hybrid, and fuel cell vehicles, Proc. IEEE, 95(4), 704-718. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2007.892489.

  • G.L. Solliec, A. Chasse, J.V. Frank and D. Walser. 2013. Dual mode vehicle with in-wheel motor: Regenerative braking optimization, Oil and Gas: Sci. and Tech., 68(1), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2012013.

  • K. Nam, H. Fujimoto and Y. Hori. 2014. Advanced motion control of electric vehicles based on robust lateral tire force control via active front steering, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 19(1), 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2012.2233210.

  • G. Cong, L. Mostefai, M. Denai and Y. Hori. 2009. Direct yaw-moment control of an in wheel - motored electric vehicle based on body slip angle fuzzy observer, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electronics, 56(5), 1411-1419. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2009.2013737.

  • H. Fujimoto, A. Tsumasaka and T. Noguchi. 2005. Direct yaw-moment control of electric vehicle based on cornering stiffness estimation, Proc. IECON 31st Annual Conf., Raleigh, NC, USA.

  • F.K. Wu, T.J. Yeh and C.F. Huang. 2013. Motor control and torque co-ordination of an electric vehicle actuated by two in-wheel motors, Mechatronics, 23, 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2012.10.008.

  • M. Saied and K. Damien. 2002. Vehicle handling improvement by active steering, Vehicle System Dynamics, 38(3), 211-242. https://doi.org/10.1076/vesd.38.3.211.8288.

  • D. Li, S. Du and F. Yu. 2008. Integrated vehicle chassis control based on direct yaw moment, active steering and active stabilizer, Vehicle System Dynamics, 46, 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110801939204.

  • M. Nagai, M. Shino and F. Gao. 2002. Study on integrated control of active front steer angle and direct yaw moment, JSAE Review, 23(3), 309-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0389-4304(02)00189-3.

  • Z. Shuai, H. Zhang, J. Wang, J. Li and M. Ouyang. 2014. Combined AFS and DYC control of four-wheel-independent-drive electric vehicles over CAN network with time varying delays, IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech., 63(2), 591-602. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2013.2279843.

  • R. Hayama and K. Nishizaki. 2000. The vehicle stability control responsibility improvement using steer-by-wire, Proc. IEEE Intelligent Veh. Symp., 596-601.

  • S.C. Baslamisli, I.E. Kose and G. Anlas. 2009. Gain scheduled integrated active steering and differential control for vehicle handling improvement, Vehicle System Dynamics, 47(1), 99-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110801927100.

  • M.A. Selby, M.D. Brown, W.J. Manning and D.A. Crolla. 2001. A co-ordination approach for DYC and active front steering, SAE Tech. Paper, 2001-01-1275.

  • J. Wang and R.G. Longoria. 2009. Co-ordinated and reconfigurable vehicle dynamics control, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Tech., 17(3), 723-732.

  • H. Zhang, X. Zhang and J. Wang. 2014. Robust gainscheduling energy-to-peak control of vehicle lateral dynamics stabilization, Vehicle System Dynamics, 52(3), 309-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2013.879190.

  • H. Du, N. Zhang and G. Dong. 2010. Stabilizing vehicle lateral dynamics with considerations of parameter uncertainties and control saturation through robust yaw control, IEEE Trans. Vehicular Tech., 59(5), 2593-2597. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2010.2045520.

  • K. Kin, O. Yano and H. Urabe. 2003. Enhancements in vehicle stability and steer ability with slip control, JSAE Review, 24(1), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0389-4304(02)00246-1.

  • B. Mashadi, S. Mostaani and M. Majidi. 2011. Vehicle stability enhancement by using an active differential, Proc. MechE., Part I: J. Systems and Control Engg., 225(8), 1098-1114.

  • R. Russo, S. Strano and M. Terzo. 2016. Enhancement of vehicle dynamics via an innovative magnetorheological fluid limited slip differential, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 70-71, 1193-1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.09.029.

  • M. Abe. 1999. Vehicle dynamics and control for improving handling and active safety: from four-wheel steering to direct yaw moment control, Proc. IMechE., Part K: J. Multi-body Dynamics, 213(2), 87-101.

  • S.C. Chang. 2007. Synchronization in a steer-by-wire vehicle dynamic system, Int. J. Engg. Sci., 45, 628-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2007.04.008.

  • B. Mashadi and M. Majid. 2011. Integrated AFS/DYC sliding mode controller for a hybrid electric vehicle, Int. J. Vehicle Design, 56(1/2/3/4), 246-269. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2011.043268.

  • D. Azeddine. 2013. A simplified sliding mode controlled electronic differential for an electric vehicle with two independent wheel drives, Energy & Power Engg., 5(6), 416-421. https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2013.56044.

  • E.S. Mohamed. 2013. Design and performance analysis of the hybrid powertrain strategies for split hybrid vehicles with CVT, Int. J. Electric and Hybrid Vehicles, 5(3), 195-214. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEHV.2013.057605.

  • A. Hasan, S.Mh. Bagher and M. Sabahi. 2014. A modified integral sliding mode control to lateral stabilisation of 4-wheel independent drive electric vehicles, Vehicle System Dynamics, 52(12), 1584-1606. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2014.951661.

  • E.S. Mohamed and S.A. Albatlan. 2014. Analysis and testing for slip characteristics of artificial hydraulic circuit based push-belt continuously variable transmission, Int. J. Vehicle Structures & Systems, 6(1-2), 8-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.6.1-2.02.

  • M. Mirzaei, G. Alizadeh, M. Eslamian and Sh. Azadi. 2008. An optimal approach to nonlinear control of vehicle yaw dynamics, Proc. IMechE Part I: J. Systems and Control Engg., 222(4), 217-229.

  • M. Behrooz, A. Pouyan, M. Majid and K. Mehdi. 2015. Integrated robust controller for vehicle path following, Multibody System Dynamics, 33, 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-014-9409-8.

  • M. Mirzaei. 2010. A new strategy for minimum usage of external yaw moment in vehicle dynamic control system, Transportation Research Part C, 18, 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2009.06.002.

  • B. Mashadi, M. Majidi and H.P. Dizaji. 2010. Optimal vehicle dynamics controller design using a four-degrees-of-freedom model, Proc. IMechE, Part D: J. Automobile Engg., 224(5), 645-659.

  • E. Esmailzadeh, A. Goodarzi and G.R. Vossoughi. 2003. Optimal yaw moment control law for improved vehicle handling, Mechatronics, 13, 659-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4158(02)00036-3.

  • S.V. Drakunov, B. Ashrafi and A. Rosiglioni. 2000. Yaw control algorithm via sliding mode control, Proc. American Control Conf., 580-583.

  • M. Boisvert and P. Micheau. 2015. Estimators of wheel slip for electric vehicles using torque and encoder measurements, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 76-77, 665-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.02.017.


Abstract Views: 641

PDF Views: 191




  • Analysis of Synchronous Moment for Active Front Steering and a Two Actuated Wheels of Electric Vehicle Based on Dynamic Stability Enhancement

Abstract Views: 641  |  PDF Views: 191

Authors

Eid. S. Mohamed
Dept. of Automotive and Tractors Engg., Mataria, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
Mh. I. Khalil
Automotive Engg. Dept., Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
Ahmed A. A. Saad
Automotive Engg. Dept., Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt

Abstract


Active Front Steering (AFS) and Direct Yaw moment Controller (DYC) are the vehicle smart systems to improve the vehicle stability and safety. The AFS uses front wheels Steer-By-Wire (SBW) system. DYC uses Rear Independent in Wheel Actuated Electric Vehicles (RIWA-EVs). It generates yaw moment to correct the vehicle state deviations. The proposed controller algorithm consists of two levels. First level feedback controller evaluate the optimal yaw moment generated to achieve the desired vehicle trajectory motion with minimize the yaw rate and side-slip errors. The second level controller is utilized to allocate the required front steer angle and traction/ regeneration to the RIWA embedded in rear wheels by taking into account the tire slip. An optimal Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) controller is designed, and its controller effectiveness is evaluated under various input driving manoeuvres. The results indicate that the integrated AFS/DYC can significantly stabilize the vehicle motion and highly reduce the driver’s workload. The laboratory experiment of AFS subsystem, for adequate actual front steering angle is measured, in order to apply in vehicle model to predict the responses. The results disclose that the RMS can be an effective route to monitor the vehicle stability.

Keywords


Vehicle Motion Stability, In-Wheel Actuated Electric Vehicle, Steering Systems, Optimal LQR Control.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.11.1.17