The Indian Practitioner

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparative Study on the Dermatoglyphic Pattern among Diabetic (Type-2) and Non-Diabetic Adults in North Indian Population


Affiliations
1 Department of Anatomy, IIMS & R, Hospital, Integral University, Lucknow (UP), India
2 Department of Physiology, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, (MP) - 486001, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Dermatoglyphics is the study of epidermal ridges and their configurations. Its appearance in individuals is genetically determined. As the diabetes mellitus also was a genetic background, one can assume that there might be certain dermatoglyphic findings specific to diabetic patients. Aims & objectives: Aim of the study is to determine the dermatoglyphic patterns and their co-relation in Type 2 diabetes mellitus in North Indian population. Material&Methods: This study was conducted in Department of Anatomy, IIMS &R, Hospital, Lucknow. 100 diabetic subjects were enrolled as test group and 150 non-diabetic healthy subjects were enrolled as control group from a healthy population. To record the fingertip patterns, Modified Purvis-Smith ink method was applied. Results: In both diabetic males and females WHORLS are most common (p≤0.000, Extremely Significant) in both right (52.07% males; 53.19% females) and left (51.32% males; 51.48% females) hands. However in non -diabetic both males and females; LOOPS are most common (Extremely Significant, p≤0.000) in both right (61.19% males; 66.67% females) and left hand. (56.90% males; 66.06% females) Conclusion: In our study, the whorls are most common pattern in both right and left hands of male as well as female diabetic subjects. Loops are most common pattern in both right and left hands, in males as well as females in non-diabetic subjects.

Keywords

Dermatoglyphics, Diabetes Mellitus, Finger Tip, Adults.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Larsen, Kronenberg et al. Williams’s textbook of endocrinology. Elsevier India Publisher, 2003; 10thEdition: 1428-1431

  • Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27:1047-53

  • Mohan V, Madan Z, Jha R, Deepa R, Pradeepa R. Diabetessocial and economic perspectives in the new millenium. Int. J. Diab. Dev. Countries 2004; 24: 29-35

  • European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Available from: http://www.easd.org/ customfiles /genin fo.htm. 2004

  • World Health Organization (WHO). A report of WHO: Consultation, Definition, Diagnosis, Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and its Complications. 1999

  • World Health Organization (WHO), International Diabetes Federation (IDF). Diabetes Action Now. 2004

  • Schaumann B, Alter M. Dermatoglyphics in Medical Disorders. NewYork: Springer Verlag; Berlin, 1976; 27: 871

  • aiwo IA and Adebanjo O. Evaluation of association between digital dermatoglyphic traits and type-2 diabetes in Lagos, Nigeria. Nig Q J Hosp Med 2012; 22(3): 191-199

  • Purvis-Smith, S.G. Finger and palm printing techniques for the clinician. Med J. Aust 1969; 2: 189

  • Feroz khan, J. Pathan, Rubeena N. Hashmi. Variations of Dermatoglyphic Features in Non Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus. International Journal of Recent Trends in Science and Technology 2013; 8 (1): 410

  • Sant SM, Vare AM, Fakhruddin S. Dermatoglyphics in diabetes mellitus. J Anat Soc India 1983; 3(2): 127-30

  • Karim, Karim J, Mohammed AL, Saleem A. Dermatoglyphics Study of Finger Prints Pattern’s Variations of a Group of Type II Diabetic Mellitus Patients in Erbil City. Zanco Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 2014; 6 (4); 11-13

  • Ravindranath R, Thomas I.H. Finger ridge count and finger print pattern in maturity onset diabetes mellitus. Ind J Med Sci 1995; 49: 153-156

  • Verbov JL. Dermatoglyphics in early onset diabetes mellitus. Human Hered. 1973; 23 (6): 535-42

  • Sengupta S, Borush J. Finger dermatoglyphic patterns in diabetes mellitus. J. Hum. Eco 1996; l7 (3): 203-206

  • Vera M, Cabrera E and Guell R. Dermatoglyphics in insulin dependent diabetic patients with limited joint mobility. Acta Diabetol 1995; 32 (2): 78-81

  • Panda M, Chinara PK, Nayak AK. Dermatoglyphics in diabetes mellitus. J Anat Soc India 2004; 53: 33-66

  • Pramila M, Padmini , Narasinga Rao and Malleswari B. The Study of Dermatoglyphics in Diabetics of North Coastal Andhra Pradesh Population. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences 2011; 1 (2): 75-80


Abstract Views: 289

PDF Views: 0




  • Comparative Study on the Dermatoglyphic Pattern among Diabetic (Type-2) and Non-Diabetic Adults in North Indian Population

Abstract Views: 289  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

R. Srivastava
Department of Anatomy, IIMS & R, Hospital, Integral University, Lucknow (UP), India
P. Indurkar
Department of Physiology, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, (MP) - 486001, India
P. Singh
Department of Physiology, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, (MP) - 486001, India
A. Singh
Department of Physiology, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, (MP) - 486001, India

Abstract


Dermatoglyphics is the study of epidermal ridges and their configurations. Its appearance in individuals is genetically determined. As the diabetes mellitus also was a genetic background, one can assume that there might be certain dermatoglyphic findings specific to diabetic patients. Aims & objectives: Aim of the study is to determine the dermatoglyphic patterns and their co-relation in Type 2 diabetes mellitus in North Indian population. Material&Methods: This study was conducted in Department of Anatomy, IIMS &R, Hospital, Lucknow. 100 diabetic subjects were enrolled as test group and 150 non-diabetic healthy subjects were enrolled as control group from a healthy population. To record the fingertip patterns, Modified Purvis-Smith ink method was applied. Results: In both diabetic males and females WHORLS are most common (p≤0.000, Extremely Significant) in both right (52.07% males; 53.19% females) and left (51.32% males; 51.48% females) hands. However in non -diabetic both males and females; LOOPS are most common (Extremely Significant, p≤0.000) in both right (61.19% males; 66.67% females) and left hand. (56.90% males; 66.06% females) Conclusion: In our study, the whorls are most common pattern in both right and left hands of male as well as female diabetic subjects. Loops are most common pattern in both right and left hands, in males as well as females in non-diabetic subjects.

Keywords


Dermatoglyphics, Diabetes Mellitus, Finger Tip, Adults.

References