Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
ECG Computerized Interpretation and Reporting – A Cautious and Informed Approach
Subscribe/Renew Journal
ECG is an often-prescribed investigation for both routine screening and diagnosis of cardiac rhythm and function. Computerized interpretation of ECG through software and algorithm is being used for improving the efficiency of diagnosis. However, there may be errors and inaccuracies in such auto-reports that may lead to further unnecessary tests or altered, inappropriate clinical management, and stress for the patient. This can adversely impact the patient as well as the healthcare system. Therefore, it is important to sensitize and train physicians at various levels about ECG interpretation and ensure that the ECG is analyzed, interpreted, and reported by a qualified physician or cardiologist, before documenting the final report for any further action.
Keywords
ECG, computerized interpretation, reporting errors, cardiologist, misdiagnosis.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Smulyan H. The Computerized ECG: Friend and Foe. Am J Med. 2019 Feb;132(2):153-160.
- Guglin ME, Thatai D. Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation. Int J Cardiol. 2006 Jan 13;106(2):232-7.
- Willems JL, Abreu-Lima C, Arnaud P, van Bemmel JH, Brohet C, Degani R, et al. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms. N Engl J Med. 1991 Dec 19;325(25):1767-73.
- Siegler JC, Rehman S, Bhumireddy G P, Abdula R, Klem I, Brener SJ, et al. The Accuracy of the Electrocardiogram during Exercise Stress Test Based on Heart Size. PLOS ONE 2011; 6(8): e23044 5. Shah AP, Rubin SA. Errors in the computerized electrocardiogram interpretation of cardiac rhythm. J Electrocardiol. 2007 Sep-Oct;40(5):385-90.
- Bogun F, Anh D, Kalahasty G, Wissner E, Bou Serhal C, Bazzi R, Weaver WD, Schuger C. Misdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation and its clinical consequences. Am J Med. 2004 Nov 1;117(9):636-42.
- Mark Estes III NA. Computerized Interpretation of ECGs. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2013; 6(1): 2-4.
- Rudusky B. Errors of Computer Electrocardiography Revisited. Angiology 2013; 64: 646-47.
- García-Niebla J, Llontop-García P, Valle-Racero JI, SerraAutonell G, Batchvarov VN, de Luna AB. Technical mistakes during the acquisition of the electrocardiogram. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2009 Oct;14(4):389-403.
- Tsai TL, Fridsma DB, MD, Gatti G. Computer Decision Support as a Source of Interpretation Error: The Case of Electrocardiograms, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2003; 10(5): 478–483.
- Goodacre S, Webster A, Morris F. Do computer-generated ECG reports improve interpretation by accident and emergency senior house officers? Postgraduate Medical Journal 2001;77:455457.
- Delrot C, Bouzillé G, Calafiore M, Rochoy M, Legrand B, Ficheur G, et al. Do Medical Practitioners Trust the Automated Interpretation of Electrocardiograms? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:536-540.
- Schläpfer J, Wellens HJ. Computer-Interpreted Electrocardiograms: Benefits and Limitations. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017; 70(9): 1183-1192.
- Wang YTL, Seow SC, Singh D, Poh KK, Chai P. Rhythmic chaos: irregularities of computer ECG diagnosis. Singapore Med J. 2017 Sep;58(9):516-520.
- Siontis KC., Noseworthy PA., Attia, ZI, Freidman PA. Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography in cardiovascular disease management. Nat Rev Cardiol 2021; 18: 465–478.
Abstract Views: 160
PDF Views: 0