Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Point-Of-Care Information Resources use by Clinicians in a Nigerian Tertiary Health Institution:A Non-Uniform Distribution
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Clinicians have been found to need more than mere primary information from sources such as MEDLINE and medical journal outlets. Information that will be useful for busy clinicians during patient care or at the bed side must be filtered for relevance, have labels for strength of recommendation and must be easily accessed. Point-of-care (POC) information resources belong here. However, their usage and distribution of use among clinicians in Nigeria have not been studied and the reason for this paper. Survey research was employed and questionnaire used to collect data from clinicians in a tertiary health institution in Southwest Nigeria on their use of fifteen selected POC information resources. The study found that while the doctors mostly (68.57%) use search engines such as Google to meet their POC information needs, very few (17.14%) will however use POC information resources. On their usage of POC information resources, the study found that eMedicine (14.29%) and 5-minute Clinical Consult (14.29%) and Clinical Evidence (11.43%) were mostly used on daily basis where eMedicine (17.14%), Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (11.43%) and Clinical Evidence (8.57%) were the ones used more on weekly basis. On the overall use average, the study found that eMedicine (21.91%), BMJ's Clinical Evidence (16.19%), and CHnical pharmacology- Elsevier (13.33%) and Cochrane Library (10.47%) were the mostly used POC information resources by clinicians in the tertiary health institution. However, the test of hypothesis on how users are distributed on POC information resources in the hospital shows a non-uniform distribution. Recommendations were made based on these findings.
Keywords
Point-of-care information, Information and Communication Technology, Mobile technologies, Medical profession, Doctors, Tertiary Health Institution, Nigeria.
User
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
Font Size
Information
- Banzi, R.; Liberati, A.; Moschetti, I.; Tagliabue, L. and Moja, L. (2010). A review of online evidence-based practice point-of-care information summary providers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(3).
- Davies, K.S. (2011). Physicians and their use of information: a survey comparison between the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMIA, 99(1): 88.
- ;Duran-Nelson, A., Gladding, S.; Beattie, J. and Nixon, L.J. (2013). Should we Google it? Resource use by internal medicine residents for point-of-care clinical decision making. Academic Medicine, 88(6): 788-794.
- Ebell, M.H. (2003). Point-of-Care Information That Changes Practice: It's Closer Than We Think. Font Med, 35(4): 261-3.
- Ebell, M.H. and Shaughnessy, A. (2(X)3). Information mastery: integrating continuing medical education with the information needs of clinicians. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 23(S1): S53-62.
- Sackett, D.L. and Straus, S.E. (1998). Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: die evidence cart. JAMA, 280(15): 1336-1338.
- Smith, R. (1996). What clinical information do doctors need? BMJ, 313(7064): 1062-1068.
- Tonks, A. and Smitii, R. (1996). Information in practice. BMJ, 313(7055): 438.
- Wallace, S.; Clark, M. and White, J. (2012). 'It's on my iPhone': attittides to tiie use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open, 2(4): e001099.
Abstract Views: 204
PDF Views: 0