Information Studies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Seminal Mnemonics in Knowledge Organization:Ancient Traditions and Modern Practices


Affiliations
1 Documentation Research and Training Centre, Indian Statistical Institute, Mysore Road, 8th Mile, Bangalore 560059, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The use of seminal mnemonics implies the identification, at the near-seminal level, of similar subsets or groups of concepts (ideas) in subject domains and deriving a similar pattern of organization of the subsets in different domains. More specifically it consists in having the same digit or digit group to denote seminally equivalent ideas in whatever subject they may occur, even though different terms may be used to denote the ideas in the different subject fields. Seminal mnemonics are helpful in the organization of concepts - in the presentation of ideas in technical writing and in discourses, in designing schemes for subject classification, taxonomy etc. This paper examines the sequence of steps in the thinking process in different contexts, such as, systems analysis, systems design, knowledge management, problem solving, decision making, and the process of classifying subjects. Two main categories of concepts are identified, namely, concepts denoting attributes of the elements of the system studied and concepts denoting actions taken at each step in designing the system. The steps and their sequence are similar and parallel in the contexts examined. To facilitate remembering these systematic steps numerals and their ordinal values are used to organize or 'fix* the sequence. We also indicate the similarity in the association of concepts with numbers in some ancient traditions.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abell, Angela and Oxbrow, Nigel. (2001). Competing with knowledge: the information professional in the knowledge management age. London, U.K., Library Association Publishing, p. 117.

  • Ackoff, R L et al. (1962). Scientific method: optimizing applied research decisions.

  • Adrienne, Carol. Numerology: the science of numbers. Carol Adrienne and Stouse Technology, Inc. http://www.mastery.net/misc/numeroIogy.htm.

  • Beghtol, Clare (2001). Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning. In: Relationships in the organization of knowledge, ed. by Carol A. Bean and Rebecca Green. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Bhashyananda, Swami (2003). From the unreal to the real. Chennai: Sri Ramakrishna Math.

  • Boulding, Kenneth E. (19S6). General systems theory - the skeleton of science. Management Science. Vol. 3; p. 197-208.

  • Chopra, Deepak (2000). How to know God: the soul's Journey into the mystery of mysteries. London: Rider.

  • Cohen, Morris R. and Nagel, Ernest. (1934). Introduction to logic and scientific method. Ch.19.

  • De Bono, Edward (1999). Six thinking hats. Rev. and updated. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.

  • Duncker, K. (1945). Qualitative (experimental and theoretical study of productive thinking (solving of problems) Psychological monographs, p. 270. (Also in Journal of Genetic Psychology. Vol. 33; 1926; p.642-708)

  • Franz, Marie-Louise von (1974). Number and time: reflections leading towards a unification of psychology and physics. London: Rider

  • Green, Rebecca (2001). Relationships in the organization of knowledge: an overview. In: Relationships in the Organization of knowledge, ed. by Carol A. Bean and Rebecca Green. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; Chapter 1.

  • Judge, Anthony. (1978). Representation, comprehension and communication of sets the role of number, (with 4 Annexes) (Website) Originally published in International classification. Vol. 5(3); 1978; p.126-133; 6(1); 1979; p.15-25; 6(2), 1979; p.82-103.

  • Lazlo, E. (1972) Introduction to systems philosophy: toward a new paradigm of contemporary thought; p. 200-204

  • Meher Baba (2001). God speaks: the theme of creation and its purpose. [First Indian edition of Sufism Reoriented.MosXy on states of consciousness] Hyderabad, India: Meher Mownavam Publications.

  • Miller, George A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Review. Vol. 63; p.81.

  • Neelameghan, A (1968) Books and articles: Guiding principles for preparation of text. Library Science with a Slant to Documentation. Vol. 5; Paper B.

  • Neelameghan, A. (1970). Seminal mnemonics as a pattern for system analysis. Library Science with a Sland to Documentation, Paper P.

  • Neelameghan, A. (1975). Presentation of ideas in technical writing. New Delhi, Vikas Publishing House

  • O'Dell, Carla and Grayson Jr., C. Jackson. (1994). If only we know what we know; the transfer of internal knowledge and best practices. New York, NY: The Free Press.

  • Piatt, Deb. Mysticism in world religions, http://www.digiserve.com/mystic/

  • Pratap Lingam. (1972) Use of seminal mnemonics in the presentation of ideas. DRTC Annual Seminar. Vol. 10; Paper AN.

  • Ranganathan, S.R. (1967) Prolegomena to library classification. Ed. 3. Assisted by M.A. Gopinath. Chap KE.

  • Russell, Bertrand (1961). Has man a fixture. Penguin Special; p. 8

  • Simon, Herbert. (1969). The sciences of the artificial Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, p.78.

  • Srinivasan, Radhika (2002). Sacred space: a journey through the spirit of Asian art. Mumbai: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. Ch. 7: Space of consciousness.

  • Subramanyam, K. (1976). Seminal mnemonics in classification. International Classification. Vol.3(l);p.l6-18.

  • Unesco, Paris. (1978). Method fi)r priority determination in science and technology. Paris: Unesco; p. 24.

  • Wilber, Ken (1999). The spectrum of consciousness. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass PubUshers. Ch.6.


Abstract Views: 200

PDF Views: 0




  • Seminal Mnemonics in Knowledge Organization:Ancient Traditions and Modern Practices

Abstract Views: 200  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Neelamegha
Documentation Research and Training Centre, Indian Statistical Institute, Mysore Road, 8th Mile, Bangalore 560059, India
K. S. Raghavan
Documentation Research and Training Centre, Indian Statistical Institute, Mysore Road, 8th Mile, Bangalore 560059, India

Abstract


The use of seminal mnemonics implies the identification, at the near-seminal level, of similar subsets or groups of concepts (ideas) in subject domains and deriving a similar pattern of organization of the subsets in different domains. More specifically it consists in having the same digit or digit group to denote seminally equivalent ideas in whatever subject they may occur, even though different terms may be used to denote the ideas in the different subject fields. Seminal mnemonics are helpful in the organization of concepts - in the presentation of ideas in technical writing and in discourses, in designing schemes for subject classification, taxonomy etc. This paper examines the sequence of steps in the thinking process in different contexts, such as, systems analysis, systems design, knowledge management, problem solving, decision making, and the process of classifying subjects. Two main categories of concepts are identified, namely, concepts denoting attributes of the elements of the system studied and concepts denoting actions taken at each step in designing the system. The steps and their sequence are similar and parallel in the contexts examined. To facilitate remembering these systematic steps numerals and their ordinal values are used to organize or 'fix* the sequence. We also indicate the similarity in the association of concepts with numbers in some ancient traditions.

References