Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Characterization of Clad Joints of High Strength Low Alloy Steel with Stainless Steel and Titanium


Affiliations
1 Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Kanchanbagh PO, Hyderabad-500058, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In the present investigation, a study has been carried out to understand the structure-property correlations in explosive clad joints of high strength low alloy steel (Yield Strength >600 MPa) in as-clad, hot rolled and heat treated conditions. The cladding materials employed were austenitic stainless steel of AISI 347 grade and commercial pure (CP) titanium. An attempt has also been made to realise the structure-property correlations in the clad joint of the HSLA steel with AISI 347 grade austenitic stainless steel produced by weld overlay cladding technique. In explosive cladding, the interface was found to be wavy type and in weld overlay cladding, the interface was flat. Explosive clad joints of HSLA steel + austenitic stainless steel exhibited a bond strength of 491 MPa in as-clad condition and 408 MPa after hot rolling and heat treatment. Explosive clad joint of HSLA steel + CP titanium exhibited a bond strength of 356 MPa in as-clad condition as CP titanium possesses lower strength (337 MPa) compared to that of AISI 347 grade austenitic stainless steel (515 MPa). The weld overlay clad joint exhibited a bond strength of 488 MPa which is almost equal to that of explosive clad joint in as-clad condition. The clad joints of austenitic stainless steel and CP titanium, with the base plate in heat treated condition, exhibited good formability when three point bend tests were conducted upto 114º and 139º respectively.

Keywords

Explosive Cladding, Weld Overlay Cladding, Hsla Steel, Stainless Steel, Microstructure, Shear Bond Strength.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Narayanadas J (2012); Naval materials for lndian defence applications, IIM Metal News-Special Issue on Defence Materials,15, 2, pp. 20-27.
  • Malakondaiah G, Srinivas M and Balamuralikrishnan R (2012); High performance steels for Indian defence, IIM Metal News-Special Issue on Defence Materials, 15, 2, pp. 28-31.
  • ASTM E 8, (2004); Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials, Annual book of ASTM standards-2004, ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA.
  • Crossland B and Bahrani BS, (1981); Fundamentals of explosive welding, Source Book on Innovative Welding Processes, ASM, Metals Park, Ohio, pp. 99-115.
  • Cowan GR, Bergmann OR and Holtzman AH (1971); Metallurgical Transactions, 2A, pp. 3145 -3155.
  • Mamalis AG, Szalay A, Vaxevanidis NM and Pantelis DI, (1994); Materials Science and Engineering, A188, 267-275.
  • Nobili A, Masri T and Lafont M C (1999); in Proc Reactive Metals in Corrosive Applications Conference, ATI Wah Chang, Albany, OR, USA, pp. 89-98.
  • Kacar R and Acarer M, (2003); Microstructure–property relationship in explosively welded duplex stainless steel–steel, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 363, pp. 290-96.
  • Nobili A (1998); Stainless Steel World, 10, pp. 33-37.
  • Holtzmann AH and Cowan GR (1965); American Welding Society, Welding Research Council Bulletin, 104, pp.1-40.
  • Kamachi MU, Ananda Rao B M, Shanmugam K, Natarajan R and Baldev Raj (2003); Corrosion and microstructural aspects of dissimilar joints of titanium and type 304L stainless steel, Journal of Nuclear Materials, 321, pp. 40-48.
  • Nizamettin Kahraman, Behcet Gulenc and Fehim Findik, (2005); Joining of titanium/stainless steel by explosive welding and effect on interface, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 169, pp. 127-133.
  • Song J, Kostka A, Veehmayer M and Raabe D (2011); Hierarchical microstructure of explosive joints: Example of titanium to steel cladding, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 528, pp. 2641-47.
  • Venkateswara Rao N, Sarma DS, Nagarjuna S and Madhusudhan Reddy G (2009); Influence of hot rolling and heat treatment on structure and properties of HSLA steel explosively clad with austenitic stainless steels', Material Science and Technology, 25, pp. 1387-1396.

Abstract Views: 335

PDF Views: 4




  • Characterization of Clad Joints of High Strength Low Alloy Steel with Stainless Steel and Titanium

Abstract Views: 335  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

N. Venkateswara Rao
Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Kanchanbagh PO, Hyderabad-500058, India
G. Madhusudhan Reddy
Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Kanchanbagh PO, Hyderabad-500058, India
S. Nagarjuna
Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Kanchanbagh PO, Hyderabad-500058, India

Abstract


In the present investigation, a study has been carried out to understand the structure-property correlations in explosive clad joints of high strength low alloy steel (Yield Strength >600 MPa) in as-clad, hot rolled and heat treated conditions. The cladding materials employed were austenitic stainless steel of AISI 347 grade and commercial pure (CP) titanium. An attempt has also been made to realise the structure-property correlations in the clad joint of the HSLA steel with AISI 347 grade austenitic stainless steel produced by weld overlay cladding technique. In explosive cladding, the interface was found to be wavy type and in weld overlay cladding, the interface was flat. Explosive clad joints of HSLA steel + austenitic stainless steel exhibited a bond strength of 491 MPa in as-clad condition and 408 MPa after hot rolling and heat treatment. Explosive clad joint of HSLA steel + CP titanium exhibited a bond strength of 356 MPa in as-clad condition as CP titanium possesses lower strength (337 MPa) compared to that of AISI 347 grade austenitic stainless steel (515 MPa). The weld overlay clad joint exhibited a bond strength of 488 MPa which is almost equal to that of explosive clad joint in as-clad condition. The clad joints of austenitic stainless steel and CP titanium, with the base plate in heat treated condition, exhibited good formability when three point bend tests were conducted upto 114º and 139º respectively.

Keywords


Explosive Cladding, Weld Overlay Cladding, Hsla Steel, Stainless Steel, Microstructure, Shear Bond Strength.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.22486/iwj%2F2018%2Fv51%2Fi4%2F176799