Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Estimate the Geomorphological Parameters of the Arang Watershed in Chhattisgarh Region
Subscribe/Renew Journal
This study was conducted for the Arang watershed of the Chhattisgarh, India. Several geomorphological parameters of the watershed were determined using standard procedure. The Arang is 3rd order watershed and comprises of 10 villages. Predominant soil of the watershed is clay loam. The watershed receives an average annual rainfall of 1400 mm, out of which the monsoon season (June to October) contributes more than 85 per cent rainfall. The number of 1st, 2nd and 3rd Order were found to be 20, 4, 1, respectively. The different geomorphometric parameters of watershed were determined and result showed that total length of stream segments were 26.14, 9.37, 8.56 km, respectively. Area of sub-basin for 1st, 2nd and 3rd order streams and of different order streams were to be 32.35, 43.94, and 54.50 km2, respectively, for 1st, 2nd and 3rd order streams. The mean bifurcation ratio for the watershed was found to be 4.64. The length ratio, circularity ratio and elongation ratio for the Arang watershed were determined and found to be 2.724, 0.9148 and 0.973, respectively. The hypsometric integral of the watershed was calculated to be 0.998 km. The drainage density, length of over land flow and constant of channel maintenance of the watershed were found to be 0.808 km/km2, 0.618 km and 1.237 km, respectively. The main channel slope of the watershed was 0.005 whereas compactness co-efficient of the watershed was 1.093. The stream frequency, basin shape factor, form factor, and ruggedness number of the watershed were 0.458 km2, 2.578, 0.387, 0701 and 0.016, respectively. The values of relative relief and relative ratio of the watershed was found to be 1.452×10-3 and 1.687×10-3, respectively. The weighted average slope of the entire watershed was found to be 1.5 per cent. This parameter which indicates that topography of watershed is flat.
Keywords
Morphological Parameters, Geomorphological Watershed Parameters, Runoff Measurement Parameters, Geomorphological Parameters, Watershed Parameters, Geomorphological Features.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Chopra, R., Diman, R.D. and Sharma, P.K. (2005). Morphometric analysis of sub watershed in Gurdaspur district, Panjab using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 33(4) : 532-539.
- Horton, R.E. (1932). Drainage basin characteristics, trans., Am. Geophys Union, 13 : 350-361.
- Horton, R.E.(1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrological approach to quantitative morphology, bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 56 : 275-370.
- Melton, M.A. (1957). An analysis of the relations among elements of climate, surface properties and geomorphology. Tech report 11, Columbia Univ., Dept. of Geology.
- Miller, V.C. (1953). A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the clinch mountain area, tech. repot-3, Columbia. Univ. Deptt. of Geology.
- Nag, S.K. (1998).Morphometric analysis using remote sensing techniques in the Chakra sub- basin, Purulia District, West Bengal, photonirvachak: J. India Soc. Remote Sensing, 26 (1&2) : 69-76.
- Nautiyal, M.D. (1994). Morphometric analysis of a drainage basin using aerial photographs: A case study of Khairkuli basin, district Dehradun, U.P. Photonirvachak: J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 22(4) : 251-261.
- Narendra, K. and Rao, K.N. (2006). Morphometry of the Meghdrigeddda watershed, Visskhapatanam District, Andhra Pradesh using GIS and Resourcesat data. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing , 34 (2) : 101-110.
- Schumann, S.A. (1956). Evaluation of drainage systems and slopes in bad lands at parth Amboy, New Jersy, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 67 : 597-646.
- Strahler, A.N. (1957). Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 38 : 913–920.
- Tripathi, M.P., Panda, R.K., Pradhan, S. and Sudhakar, S. (2002). Runoff modeling of a small watershed using satellite data and GIS. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 30 (1&2) : 39-52.
Abstract Views: 239
PDF Views: 0