International Journal of Agricultural Engineering

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Study on the Performance on Productivity of Sugarcane Crop with Different Combination of Tillage Operations


Affiliations
1 Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Vaugh Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), India
2 Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, Vaugh Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


A field experiment was conducted to test the intensification and productivity of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) for two consecutive years (2014-15 to 2015-16) at Amroha district of Uttar Pradesh, India. Different sugarcane planter and conservative tillage practices were taken as different variables for experiments. Two irrigation treatment I1 (Pre planting irrigation) and I2 (Post planting irrigation); two tillage treatment T1 (Conventional tillage) and T2 (Rotavator) followed by five planting treatment P0 (Conventional practice), P1 (Disc type sugarcane planter), P2 (Slit type sugarcane planter), P3 (Ridger type sugarcane planter) P4 (Furrower type sugarcane planter) were performed and tested under RBD (Factorial 2 x 5 x 2) with three replications. Pre irrigation treatments showed better results as compared to post irrigation with most promising with conventional method of tillage. Although treatment T7 (I1P3T1) yields with the highest values of bud germinations (50.37 and 51.71%) at 60 DAP, cane girth (9.31 and 9.67 cm), single cane weight (1.72 and 1.96 kg), cane yield (1074.67 and 1235.53 q/h-1). It was concluded that the mechanized planting system requires less labour and is more frugal than the conventional one.

Keywords

Sugarcane, Irrigation, Tillage, Cane Yield, Planter.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abayomi, Y.A., Etejere, E.O. and Fadayomi, O. (1990). Effect of stalk section, coverage depth and date of first irrigation on seed cane germination of two commercial sugarcane cultivars in Nigeria. Turrialba, 40 : 1.

  • Bhalerao, V.H. (2001). Effects of subsoil loosening and irrigation on soil physical properties, ischolar_main distribution and water uptake of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Soil & Tillage Res., 13 : 267-285.

  • Choudhry, J.K. (1960). Effect of irrigation with Ammonium Sulphate on the growth, yield and quality of sugar cane (Co 453). Indian Agriculturist, 4: 33-43.

  • Divino, C.K. and Victor, P.S. (1997). Calculos na Agroindustria da cana de acucar. Piracicaba: STAB: Acucar, Alcool e Subprodutos, Sao Paulo 193 p.

  • Duli, Z., Barry, G. and Jack, C.C. (2010). Sugarcane response to water-deficit stress during early growth on organic and sand soils. AJABS, 5: 403-414.

  • Hagos, Hadush, Leul, Mengistu Yusuf Kedir and Kidane Tesfamicheal (2014). Effect of first irrigation period on sugarcane (Saccharium officinarium L.) establishment in the drought areas of Tendaho, Ethiopia. Adv. Crop Sci. Tech., 2 : 4.

  • Humbert, R.P. (1968). The growing of sugarcane. Amsterdam, Elsevier Publishing Company. pp 1-20.

  • Inbaraj, J. and Jacob Stanley (2015). Economics of sugarcane cultivation in Tirupattur block of Vellore district., Asian J. Res. Business Econo. & Mgmt., 5 (3) : 19-29.

  • Inman-Bamber N.G. and Smith, D.M. (2004). Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits. Field Crop Res., 92 : 185-202.

  • Kumar, O.B. Pramod and Rathinam, P. (2015). Energy use pattern in sugarcane production – a study in erode district, Internat. Multidisciplinary Res. J.,5 (6) : 98-104

  • Malavia, C., Gupta, R., Bhoyal, D.A. and Yadav, G. (1988). Subsoil improvement in a tropical coarse textured soil: Effect of deep-ripping and slotting. Soil & Tillage Res., 99 : 245-253.

  • Naidu, Mohan K. and Venkataramana, S. (1988). Proc. Int. Cong. of Plant Physiology, IARI, New Delhi, India. 169 pp.

  • Pawar, Sanjay and Bukhtar, R. (2011). Performance feasibility and economic viability of sugarcane planter in western plane zone of Uttar Pradesh, India, Sugar Tech., 13(2):101–108

  • Ramesh, P. (2000). Effect of different levels of drought during the formative phase on growth parameters and its relationship with dry matter accumulation in sugarcane. Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, India. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 185: 83-89.

  • Singh, J.P. and Dixit, O.N. (1989). Improved IISR bullock drawn sugarcane planter Indian Society of Agricultural Engineering. Paper no. 80-123.

  • Singh, M.A. and Singh, S. (2006). Response of sugarcane canopy development to water stresses. Field Crops Res., 98: 91-97.

  • Singh, S.P., Singh, R.S. and Singh, S. (2011). Sale trend of tractors and farm power availability in India. Agric. Engg. Today, 35(2): 25-35

  • Smit, J.G. and Singels, C.H.A. (2006). Otimizacao do uso da agua e do zinco na cana-de-acucar em Tabuleiro Costeiro Paraibano. 142 f. Tese (Doutorado em Recursos Naturais). Curso de Pos-graduacao em Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Paraiba.

  • Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1967). Statistical method. The IOWA state University Press, IOWA.

  • Tarimo, S.K. and Takamura, C. (1998). Produtividade da canadeacucar em relação ao clima e solos da Regiao Noroeste do Estado de Sao Paulo. Rev. Bras. Cienc. do Solo, 23(3):627-634.

  • Vasantha, S., Alarmelu, S., Hemprabha, G. and Shanthi, R.M. (2005). Evaluation of promising sugarcane genotypes for drought Sugar Tech., 7(2 & 3) : 82

  • Yang, S.J. and Chauhan, J. (1980) Germination response of sugarcane cultivars to soil moisture and temperature. Manila ISSCT, 1:30-37.


Abstract Views: 410

PDF Views: 0




  • A Study on the Performance on Productivity of Sugarcane Crop with Different Combination of Tillage Operations

Abstract Views: 410  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Manish Kumar
Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Vaugh Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), India
Ashok Tripathi
Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Vaugh Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), India
Prashant M. Dsouza
Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, Vaugh Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), India
Devesh Kumar
Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Vaugh Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), India

Abstract


A field experiment was conducted to test the intensification and productivity of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) for two consecutive years (2014-15 to 2015-16) at Amroha district of Uttar Pradesh, India. Different sugarcane planter and conservative tillage practices were taken as different variables for experiments. Two irrigation treatment I1 (Pre planting irrigation) and I2 (Post planting irrigation); two tillage treatment T1 (Conventional tillage) and T2 (Rotavator) followed by five planting treatment P0 (Conventional practice), P1 (Disc type sugarcane planter), P2 (Slit type sugarcane planter), P3 (Ridger type sugarcane planter) P4 (Furrower type sugarcane planter) were performed and tested under RBD (Factorial 2 x 5 x 2) with three replications. Pre irrigation treatments showed better results as compared to post irrigation with most promising with conventional method of tillage. Although treatment T7 (I1P3T1) yields with the highest values of bud germinations (50.37 and 51.71%) at 60 DAP, cane girth (9.31 and 9.67 cm), single cane weight (1.72 and 1.96 kg), cane yield (1074.67 and 1235.53 q/h-1). It was concluded that the mechanized planting system requires less labour and is more frugal than the conventional one.

Keywords


Sugarcane, Irrigation, Tillage, Cane Yield, Planter.

References