Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Performance Evaluation of Sugar Cane Cutter Planter Using Different Parameters
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Sugarcane planting is a very labour intensive job and involves considerable human drudgery. Planting creates the foundation for a crop and plays a crucial role in its growth and yield. Study was undertaken to evaluate the performance of two different models of sugarcane planters. One model was Khalsa PE-630 type cuter planter manufactured M/S Punjab engineers, Meerut and the other was ITI make cutter planter designed by Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, and manufactured by Indian Telephone Industries, Rai Bareli. In addition to this two different experimental test set ups based on different principals were developed for measuring cutting forces for sugarcane cutting. It was observed that field capacity of Khallsa make planter was 0.20 ha/hr with the field efficiency of 87.50% at effective working width of 1.34 m and a forward speed of 2.54 km/hr at 2nd low gear. A set length of 32.96 cm with average.
Keywords
Sugarcane, Cutter Plauter.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Bhal, V.P. and Sharma, T.R. (2001). Present status and scope of tractor drawn automatic lister sugarcane cutter planter in Haryana. Paper presented at annual convention of ISAE held at OUAY Bhubneshar.
- Bledsoe, B.L. and Portfile,d J. K. (1971). A high speed ratory sickle for cutting and tranjectign Planes. Trans. ASAE, 14 (5): 818-824.
- Frontczak, J. and Molendowskli, F. (1990). Examination of the forces and work during com cob – cutting operation Zeszyly Naukowe akademi Rolniczej we Wrocklawiu Mechanizacij Rolnictwa No. 183.31-35.
- Jamadae and Abasahed, S. (1998). Performance of different sugarcane planters compared to manual planting. in proceeding of International Agricultural engineering conference, Bankol, Thialand. December 7-10
- Srivastava, A.C. (1995). Design and development of sugarcane planter with tillage disc. Appl. Engg. Agric., 11 (3): 335-341.
Abstract Views: 239
PDF Views: 0