International Journal of Agricultural Engineering

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comparative Study of Artificial Intelligence and Conventional Techniques for Rainfall-Runoff Modeling


Affiliations
1 Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, U.S. Nagar (Uttarakhand), India
2 Department of Farm Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu Univesity, Varanasi (U.P.), India
3 Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, U.S. Nagar (Uttarakhand), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The essential for accurate modeling of the rainfall–runoff process has grown rapidly in the past decades. However, considering the high stochastic property of the process, many models are still being developed in order to define such a complex phenomenon. In this study, two AI-based models which are reliable in capturing the periodicity features of the process are introduced for river rainfall–runoff modeling. In the first model, the ANN model, an ANN is used to five different type training algorithms namely momentum, Quickprop, Delta-Bar-Delta, Conjugate Gradient and Levenberg Marquardt. In the second model, ANFIS model trained used to two different type membership function (MFs) viz., Gaussian and generalized bell and conventional techniques was used multiple linear regression (MLR). The artificial intelligence performed better than the conventional techniques for rainfall-runoff modelling of study area. The ANFIS models performing the best results, ANN models gives the satisfactory results and MLR model having poor result in runoff prediction for Arpa River basin. Also gamma test (GT) was used for identifying the best input combination of input variables.

Keywords

Artificial Neural Network, Adaptive Neural-Fuzzy Inference System, Multiple Linear Regression, Gamma Test.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Daniell, T.M. (1991). Neural networks applications in hydrology and water resources engineering. International Conference on Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, 3(3): 797-802.

  • Dawson, C.W. and Wilby, R.L. (1998). An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modeling. Hydrological Sci. J., 43(1): 47-66.

  • Fernando, D.A.K. and Jayawardena, A.W. (1998). Runoff forecasting using RBF networks with OLS algorithm. J. Hydrol. Engg., 3(3): 203-209.

  • Folorunsho, J. Garba, S. Obiniyi, A.A. and Ajibade, A.O. (2014) A comparison of ANFIS and ANN–based models in River discharge forecasting. New Ground Res. J. Physical Sci., 1 (1): 1-16.

  • He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. and Sun, J. (2014). Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition. arXiv:1406:4729.

  • Helsel, D.R. and Hirsch, R.M. (2002). Statistical Methods in Water Resources. Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the U. S Geological Survey Book 4, Hydrologic Analysis and Interpretation, Chapter A3.

  • Jain, S.K. and Srivastva, D.K. (1999). Application of ANN for reservoir in flow prediction and operation. J. Water Resour. Planning & Manage, 125(5): 263-271.

  • Jiang, S., Ren, L., Hong, Y., Yong, B., Yang, X., Yuan, F. and Ma, M. (2012). Comprehensive evaluation of multi-satellite precipitation products with a dense rain gauge network and optimally merging their simulated hydrological flows using the Bayesian model averaging method. J. Hydrol., 452–453(0): 213-225.

  • Khan, M.S. and Coulbaly, P. (2006). Bayesian neural network for rainfall-runoff modeling. Water Resour. Res., 42(7): 225-234.

  • Kisi, O., Shiri, J. and Tombul, M. (2013). Modeling rainfall-runoff process using soft computing techniques.Computers & Geosciences, 51 : 108–117.

  • Kisi, O. (2015). Stream flow forecasting and estimation using least square support vector regression and adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy embedded Fuzzy c-means clustering. Water Resourc. Mgmt., 29(14): 5109-5127.

  • Lin, G.F. and Wu, M.C. (2011). An RBF network with a two-step learning algorithm for developing a reservoir inflow forecasting model. J. Hydrol., 405(3-4): 439-450.

  • Lorrai, M. and Sechi, G.M. (1995). Neural nets for modeling rainfall-runoff transformations.Water Resour. Manage, 9 : 299-313.

  • McCulloch, W. and Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Mathematical Biophysics, 5:115-133.

  • Moradkhani, H., Hsu, K.L., Gupta, H.V. and Sorooshian, S. (2004). Improved stream flow forecasting using self-organizing radial basis function artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol., 295(1–4): 246-262.

  • Partal, T. (2009). River flow forecasting using different artificial neural network algorithms and wavelet transform.NRC Res. Press, 36: 26-39.

  • Rajurkar, M.P., Kothyari, C. and Chaube, U. (2004)Modeling of Daily Rainfall-Runoff Relationship with Artificial Neural Network. J. Hydrol., 285 : 96-113.

  • Shafaei, M. and Kisi, O. (2016). Predicting river daily flow using wavelet-artificial neural networks based on regression analyses in comparison with artificial neural networks and support vector machine models. Neural Comput. & Appl., 1 : 1-14.

  • Shamseldin, A.Y., O’connor, K.M. and Nasr, A.E. (2010). A comparative study of three neural network forecast combination methods for simulated river flows of different rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol. Sci. J., 52(5): 896-916.

  • Shrivastav, M.B., Gandhi, H.M., Ramanuj, P.K., Chudasama, M.K. and Joshi, J.A. (2014). Prediction of runoff using artificial neural networks (A Case study of Khodiyar Catchment Area). Internat. J. Scientific Res. & Dev., 2 ISSN-2321-0613.

  • Srinivasulu, S. and Jain, A. (2006). A comparative analysis of training methods for artificial neural network rainfall–runoff models. Appl. Soft Computing, 6(3): 295-306.

  • Toth, E. (2009). Classification of hydro-meteorological conditions and multiple artificial neural networks for stream flow forecasting.Hydrolog.Earth Sys. Sci., 13 : 1555-1566.


Abstract Views: 387

PDF Views: 0




  • A Comparative Study of Artificial Intelligence and Conventional Techniques for Rainfall-Runoff Modeling

Abstract Views: 387  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Vijay Kumar Singh
Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, U.S. Nagar (Uttarakhand), India
Bhaskar Pratap Singh
Department of Farm Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu Univesity, Varanasi (U.P.), India
Ashish Kumar
Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, U.S. Nagar (Uttarakhand), India
Vivekanand
Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, U.S. Nagar (Uttarakhand), India

Abstract


The essential for accurate modeling of the rainfall–runoff process has grown rapidly in the past decades. However, considering the high stochastic property of the process, many models are still being developed in order to define such a complex phenomenon. In this study, two AI-based models which are reliable in capturing the periodicity features of the process are introduced for river rainfall–runoff modeling. In the first model, the ANN model, an ANN is used to five different type training algorithms namely momentum, Quickprop, Delta-Bar-Delta, Conjugate Gradient and Levenberg Marquardt. In the second model, ANFIS model trained used to two different type membership function (MFs) viz., Gaussian and generalized bell and conventional techniques was used multiple linear regression (MLR). The artificial intelligence performed better than the conventional techniques for rainfall-runoff modelling of study area. The ANFIS models performing the best results, ANN models gives the satisfactory results and MLR model having poor result in runoff prediction for Arpa River basin. Also gamma test (GT) was used for identifying the best input combination of input variables.

Keywords


Artificial Neural Network, Adaptive Neural-Fuzzy Inference System, Multiple Linear Regression, Gamma Test.

References