Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparative to Study of the Different Intra Row Spacing of Mechanized Rice Transplanting in Fields of Chittoor District


Affiliations
1 College of Agricultural Engineering, Madakasira (A.P.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Rice is one of the most important cereals that hold the key for food security. SRI has reached certain level of acceptance among the research and scientific community in major rice producing countries. The SRI method of rice cultivation involves planting single seedling in wider row spacing i.e., 25x 25 cm, which involves more labour intensive and laborious process. Hence, the present study was conducted with an objective to compare the mechanized rice transplanting with different intra row spacing with mechanized rice transplanter method with SRI and normal method of rice cultivation. The study was conducted with four treatments i.e.,T1 - Machine transplanting at spacing of (30 x 14 cm), T2 – Machine transplanting at spacing of (30 x 18 cm), T3 - Machine transplanting at spacing of (30 x 20 cm), T4 - Machine transplanting at spacing of (30 x 22 cm) and T5 - Manual transplanting at spacing of (20 x 15 cm) (control). The study indicated that mechanized transplanting with rice transplanter adopting highest yield of (30 x 20 cm) row spacing recorded more 10.00 per cent more yield, when compared to 30 x 18 cm) method of planting. Mechanised paddy farmers were able to secure a net income Rs. 1.81/- per every rupee of expenditure. While, the convectional paddy farmers realized Rs. 1.42/-.

Keywords

Mechanised System of Rice Intensification with SRI Principles, Plant Height, Economic.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anonymous (2011). Vision 2030. Published by ICAR, Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, India
  • Anonymous (2014). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance, 2014, Directorate of Economics and Statistics,Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India (Website: http://www.dacnet.nic.in/eands).
  • Duraisamy, V.M., Sentilkumar, T. and Subbulaksmi, S. (2011). Studies on standardisation of spacing and transplanting depth for a self propelled rice transplanter. Agric. Mechanization Asia, Africa, & Latin America, 42 (1): 42-44.
  • Gani, A., Rahman, A., Dahono, Rustam and Hengsdijk, H. (2002). Synopsis of water management experiments in Indonesia. In: Water and Rice production- IRRI. 29-37.
  • Manjunatha, M.V., Masthana Reddy, B.G., Shashidhar, S.D. and Joshi, V.R. (2009). Studies on the performance of self propelled rice transplanter and its effect on crop yield. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 22(2) : 385-387.
  • Sheeja, Raj, K., Mathew, Reena, Jose, Nimmy and Leenakumary, S. (2012). Enchancing the productivity and profitability in rice cultivation by planting methods. Madras Agric. J., 99 (10-12):759- 761.
  • Singh, G. and Singh, O.P. (1993). Effect of method of seeding and level of nitrogen on yield and yield attributes of rice under flood-affected conditions. Indian J. agron., 38: 551-554.
  • Singh, R.S. and Rao, K.V.R. (2012). Impact of self propelled paddy transplanter in Kerala. Book chapter in Rural Development. International Conference of Agricultural Engineering - CIGR-AgEng 2012: agriculture and engineering for a healthier life, Valencia, Spain, 8-12 July 2012 pp. C-1698.
  • Sreenivasulu, S. and Bala, Hussain Reddy, P. (2014). Effect of mechanized transplanting on yield, yield attributes and economics of rice (Oryza sativa). J. Res. ANGRAU, 42(2) : 9-12.
  • Veeramani, P., Singh, R. Durai and Subrahmaniyan, K. (2012). Study of phyllochron - system of rice intensification (SRI) technique. Agric. Sci. Res. J., 2(6): 329-334.
  • Vijay Kumar, D,. Hari Babu, B. and Madhusudhana Reddy, K. (2012). Self – propelled walking behind type rice Transplanter-a better alternative for manual transplanting. Andhra Agric. J., 59 (4) : 630-634.

Abstract Views: 167

PDF Views: 0




  • Comparative to Study of the Different Intra Row Spacing of Mechanized Rice Transplanting in Fields of Chittoor District

Abstract Views: 167  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

M. Naga Jyothi
College of Agricultural Engineering, Madakasira (A.P.), India
G. Muralee Krishna
College of Agricultural Engineering, Madakasira (A.P.), India

Abstract


Rice is one of the most important cereals that hold the key for food security. SRI has reached certain level of acceptance among the research and scientific community in major rice producing countries. The SRI method of rice cultivation involves planting single seedling in wider row spacing i.e., 25x 25 cm, which involves more labour intensive and laborious process. Hence, the present study was conducted with an objective to compare the mechanized rice transplanting with different intra row spacing with mechanized rice transplanter method with SRI and normal method of rice cultivation. The study was conducted with four treatments i.e.,T1 - Machine transplanting at spacing of (30 x 14 cm), T2 – Machine transplanting at spacing of (30 x 18 cm), T3 - Machine transplanting at spacing of (30 x 20 cm), T4 - Machine transplanting at spacing of (30 x 22 cm) and T5 - Manual transplanting at spacing of (20 x 15 cm) (control). The study indicated that mechanized transplanting with rice transplanter adopting highest yield of (30 x 20 cm) row spacing recorded more 10.00 per cent more yield, when compared to 30 x 18 cm) method of planting. Mechanised paddy farmers were able to secure a net income Rs. 1.81/- per every rupee of expenditure. While, the convectional paddy farmers realized Rs. 1.42/-.

Keywords


Mechanised System of Rice Intensification with SRI Principles, Plant Height, Economic.

References