International Journal of Agricultural Engineering

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparative Performance of Different Puddling Equipments


Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (PAURS) Gurdaspur (Punjab), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study was conducted at farmer's field as well as at KVK farm in Gurdaspur district of Punjab to evaluate the performance of various puddling implements viz., pulverizing roller (T1) and rotavator (T2) with comparison to conventional method of puddling (T3) being used by the farmers in the various parts of the state. In T1 the puddling was done by two passes of pulversing roller whereas in T2 it was done with only single pass of rotavator and in T3 by two passes of cultivator followed by two passes of planker. The puddling index (PI) was highest in T2 (71.5%) followed by T1 (69.3 %) and T3 (49.8 %). The PI of all the treatments differed significantly from each other, though the PI in T1 and T2 was far better than T3. The infiltration rate in case of T1 and T2 was 11.8 and 17.6 per cent lower than T3, respectively. The net returns (Rs. 52,250/ha) and benefit cost ratio (3.1) was highest in case of T1, followed by T3 (Rs. 52,100/ha and 2.7) and T2 (Rs. 51970/ha and 2.5) treatments, respectively.

Keywords

Puddling Index, Infiltration Rate, Pulverizing Roller, Rotavator, Net Returns.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aggarwal, G.C., Sidhu, A.S., Sekhon, N.K., Sandhu, K.S. and Sur, H.S. (1995). Puddling and N management effects on crop response in a rice-wheat cropping system. J. Soil Tillage Res., 36 : 129-139.

  • Aggarwal, G.C., Sidhu, A.S., Sekhon, N.K., Sandhu, K.S. and Sur, H.S. (1985). Test code for puddler. BIS Standard No. IS: 11531.

  • Aggarwal, G.C., Sidhu, A.S., Sekhon, N.K., Sandhu, K.S. and Sur, H.S. (2015). Package of practices for Kharif crops. PAU, Ludhiana.

  • Bengali, B. (1976). Effect of lug angle of cage wheel on traction and puddling performance of pull wheels. M.Sc. Thesis, G.B. Pant University of Agricultural and Technology, Pantnagar, UTTARAKHAND, INDIA.

  • Bhadoria, P.B.S. (1986). Effect of compaction and tillage on the yield and percolation losses of rice in laterictic sandy loam soil. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 156 : 45-49.

  • Bodman, G.B. and Rubin, J. (1948). Soil puddling. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., 13(1) : 27-37.

  • De Datta, S.K. and Barker, R. (1978). Land preparation of rice soils. In: Soils and rice. Int Rice Inst, Loss Bonos, Philippines, pp. 623-48 (Abs).

  • Dixit, J. (2006). Performance of CIAE Animal Drawn Puddler in Kashmir Valley. J. Agril. Engg., 43(3) : July-September, 97-100.

  • Garg, I.K. and Singh, S. (2002). Farm equipment for Punjab Agriculture. Deptt. of FPM, PAU, Ludhiana

  • Kar, S., Samui, R.P., Prasad, J., Gupta, C.P. and Subramanyam, T.K. (1986). Compaction and tillage depth combinations for water management and rice production in low retentive permeable soils. Soil Tillage Res., 6 : 211-222.

  • Sharma, P.K. and Bhagat, R.M. (1993). Puddling and compaction effects on water permeability of texturally different soils. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 41: 1-6.

  • Sharma, P., Tripathi, R.P., Singh, S. and Kumar, R. (2004). Effect of tillage on soil physical properties and crop performance under rice-wheat system. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 52(1) : 20-25.

  • Singh, A.K., Srivastava, L.K., Jaggi, I.K. and Das, R.O. (1993). Water percolation dynamics as influenced by submergence level and depth of puddling in rice. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 41: 213-217.

  • Singh, K.N., Singh, B. and Singh, B. (1973). Performance studies on various puddling equipment. J. Agric. Engg., 10: 14-16.

  • Singh, S. (1983). Field evaluation of different puddling implements. Project Report Submitted to Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India BT-159.

  • Sur, H.S., Prihar, S.S. and Jalota, S.K. (1981). Effect of ricewheat rotations on water transmission and wheat ischolar_main development in sandy loam soil of Punjab, India. Soil & Tillage Res., 1 : 361-371.

  • Swaminathan, M.S. (1972). Scientific management and use of water. Indian Farming, 22(2) : 5-7.

  • Tomar, R.K., Singh, D.,Gangwar, K.S., Garg, R.N., Gupta, V.K., Sahoo, R.N., Chakraborty, D. and Kalra, Naveen (2006). Influence of tillage systems and moisture regimes on soil physical environment, growth and productivity of rice-wheat system in upper gangetic plains of Western Uttar Pradesh. Indian J. Crop Sci., 1(1-2) : 146-150.

  • Tyagi, N.K., Acharya, N. and Mohanty, P.C. (1975). Effect of puddling implement on percolation losses and water use efficiency in rice field. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 45 : 132-135.

  • Verma, A.K. and Dewangan, M.L. (2006). Efficiency and energy use in puddling of lowland rice grown on vertisols in central India. J. Soil Tillage Res., 90(1-2) : 100-107.


Abstract Views: 297

PDF Views: 1




  • Comparative Performance of Different Puddling Equipments

Abstract Views: 297  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

R. S. Chhina
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (PAURS) Gurdaspur (Punjab), India

Abstract


This study was conducted at farmer's field as well as at KVK farm in Gurdaspur district of Punjab to evaluate the performance of various puddling implements viz., pulverizing roller (T1) and rotavator (T2) with comparison to conventional method of puddling (T3) being used by the farmers in the various parts of the state. In T1 the puddling was done by two passes of pulversing roller whereas in T2 it was done with only single pass of rotavator and in T3 by two passes of cultivator followed by two passes of planker. The puddling index (PI) was highest in T2 (71.5%) followed by T1 (69.3 %) and T3 (49.8 %). The PI of all the treatments differed significantly from each other, though the PI in T1 and T2 was far better than T3. The infiltration rate in case of T1 and T2 was 11.8 and 17.6 per cent lower than T3, respectively. The net returns (Rs. 52,250/ha) and benefit cost ratio (3.1) was highest in case of T1, followed by T3 (Rs. 52,100/ha and 2.7) and T2 (Rs. 51970/ha and 2.5) treatments, respectively.

Keywords


Puddling Index, Infiltration Rate, Pulverizing Roller, Rotavator, Net Returns.

References