International Journal of Advances in Nursing Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Therapies and its Perspective among Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review


Affiliations
1 Department of Nursing, Shri Swami Bhumanand College of Nursing, Haridwar-249407,, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Objectives: This systematic review aims to assess the knowledge, attitude and practices of Complementary and alternative medicine therapies and its perspectives among healthcare professionals. Methods: PubMed/Medline, Google scholar, online data base were searched for relevant data from 2010 to 2021 in English language by using keywords of Complementary therapies, alternative medicine, healing science, soul healing therapies, allied therapies, energy healing science etc. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-AnalysisProtocols 2015 guideline and Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study Design model were used in analyzing the studies. Results: This review included 13 studies included within the last 10 years that investigated knowledge, attitude and practices regarding CAM.Finding suggested that Folk medicines (46%) and ayurvedic medicines (45%) were most commonly used CAM. Advice from friends/relatives was the commonest source of information. None of the respondents had knowledge of adverse effects of CAM used by them and about 70% did not inform their doctor about use of CAM. 61.5% of the HCPs were aware that CAM includes AYUSH. 53% of the HCPs used CAM for self, especially for respiratory disorders (28.3%) and chronic painful conditions (21.6%). The common adverse effects attributed to use of CAM among patients which required consultation of the HCPs were hepatic (42.5%) and renal impairment (32.5%), allergy (10%), relapse Conclusion: This systematic review revealed that CAM treatments depends on various factors working at multiple levels viz., personal factors, disease’ characteristics, perceived treatment characteristics (positive attributes of CAM and negative attributes of BM) and external facilitators. Furthermore, the analysis also identifies the role of two underlining forces–push and pull–in motivating CAD patients to choose CAM treatments. The push force comprises factor that participants found to have a repelling nature, whereas pull forces were regarded as advantageous for CAM usage.

Keywords

Complementary therapies, Energy Science, Aura Healing, Psychotherapy, Healing through thoughts and emotions, Indigenous therapies.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Syed Amin Tabish, Complementary and Alternative Healthcare: Is it Evidence-based ? Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2008 Jan; 2(1): V– 2.IX. PMCID: PMC3068720PMID: 21475465

  • N. Vishnu, G. K. Mini and K. R. Thankappan Complementary and alternative medicine use by diabetes patients in Kerala, India online Published by Cambridge University Press: 15 May 2017

  • Mukesh Dhankar Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Cross sectional Study in PediatricInpatients 2018 https:// doi.org/10.1177/ 2515690X18765119

  • Sujatha Shanmugasundaram2011 Journal of Cancer Pain and Symptom Palliation Complementary and Alternative Therapies in Palliative Care A Transition from Modern Medicine to Traditional Medicine in India, 2011; 1(4): 25-29, https://doi.org/10.3109/ J427v01n04_04

  • Vandana Roy V, Monica Gupta M, and Ghosh K R, Perception, attitude and usage of complementary and alternative medicine among doctors and patients in a tertiary care hospital in IndiaIndian J Pharmacol. 2015; 47(2): 137–142. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.153418 PMCID

  • Kritika Subramanian1 and Inuka Midha2 2016 Prevalence and Perspectives of Complementary and Alternative Medicine among University Students in Atlanta, Newcastle upon Tyne, and New Delhi, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9309534

  • Annie Shirwaikar Raghavan Govindarajan Ajay Kumar Singh Rawat 2013 Integrating Complementary and Alternative Medicine with Primary Health Care, Volume 2013 |Article ID 948308 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/948308

  • Jayanti Ray DNBa Debadatta Chakrabarty MDb Rudrajit Paul MRCPc Kunal Som MDd Prevalence of the use of complementary and alternative medicine in an eastern Indian population with emphasis on tribal/ ethnic minority groups Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences 2018; 13(4): 384-389 https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2018.04.001Get rights and content

  • Nayna J. Gohil, Varsha J. Patel Use of complementary and alternative medicines by patients with orthopaedic disorders in western part of India: a cross sectional study International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology, 2016; 5(5) doi : http:// dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20163206

  • Dharani Sundarmurthy, Vijayalakshmi Devarashetty, Narayana Reddy S. Complementary and alternative medicine: practice and perspective of allopathic doctors at a tertiary care hospital, 2016; 5(5) > Sundarmurthy DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319- 2003.ijbcp20163225


Abstract Views: 140

PDF Views: 0




  • Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Therapies and its Perspective among Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review

Abstract Views: 140  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Nidhi Tomar
Department of Nursing, Shri Swami Bhumanand College of Nursing, Haridwar-249407,, India

Abstract


Objectives: This systematic review aims to assess the knowledge, attitude and practices of Complementary and alternative medicine therapies and its perspectives among healthcare professionals. Methods: PubMed/Medline, Google scholar, online data base were searched for relevant data from 2010 to 2021 in English language by using keywords of Complementary therapies, alternative medicine, healing science, soul healing therapies, allied therapies, energy healing science etc. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-AnalysisProtocols 2015 guideline and Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study Design model were used in analyzing the studies. Results: This review included 13 studies included within the last 10 years that investigated knowledge, attitude and practices regarding CAM.Finding suggested that Folk medicines (46%) and ayurvedic medicines (45%) were most commonly used CAM. Advice from friends/relatives was the commonest source of information. None of the respondents had knowledge of adverse effects of CAM used by them and about 70% did not inform their doctor about use of CAM. 61.5% of the HCPs were aware that CAM includes AYUSH. 53% of the HCPs used CAM for self, especially for respiratory disorders (28.3%) and chronic painful conditions (21.6%). The common adverse effects attributed to use of CAM among patients which required consultation of the HCPs were hepatic (42.5%) and renal impairment (32.5%), allergy (10%), relapse Conclusion: This systematic review revealed that CAM treatments depends on various factors working at multiple levels viz., personal factors, disease’ characteristics, perceived treatment characteristics (positive attributes of CAM and negative attributes of BM) and external facilitators. Furthermore, the analysis also identifies the role of two underlining forces–push and pull–in motivating CAD patients to choose CAM treatments. The push force comprises factor that participants found to have a repelling nature, whereas pull forces were regarded as advantageous for CAM usage.

Keywords


Complementary therapies, Energy Science, Aura Healing, Psychotherapy, Healing through thoughts and emotions, Indigenous therapies.

References