International Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Study on Knowledge of Watershed Farmers on Various NRM Practices in Watershed Areas of Andhra Pradesh State


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Extension, College of Agriculture, Prof. Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad (Telangana), India
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Palem, Mahaboobnagar (Telangana), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The paper describes the level of knowledge of watershed farmers on various NRM practices in watershed areas of Andhra Pradesh state. The results indicated that majority of the watershed farmers fell under the category of medium (36.25%) level of knowledge followed by low (33.33%) and high (30.42%) level of knowledge. Further the rank wise analysis of level of knowledge of watershed farmers on various NRM practices infers that the usage of check dams to harvest the water has been perceived as first rank followed by usage of percolation tank for increasing the groundwater (II rank) and the least preferred knowledge items were NRM is possible only by the community participation (XIX rank), the grass which is highly recommended as vegetative barrier (XIX rank), the plants which are highly recommended for live fencing (XVIII rank) and gully formation can be checked by either building check dams or increasing width of gully, leaving it as it is and no idea (XVIII rank).

Keywords

NRM, Watershed Farmers, Knowledge.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Berjesh, A. and Ajay, K. (2009). Knowledge of farmers about soil and rainwater conservation technology and its determinants. Agric. Sci. Digest., 29(4): 283-286.

  • Chandran, K.N. (1991). A critical analysis of agriculture technology utilization in Maheswaram watershed project in Ranga Reddy district of Andhra Pradesh. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad, A. P. (INDIA).

  • Dey, P. and Sarkar, A.K. (2011).Revisiting indigenous farming knowledge of Jharkhand (India) for conservation of natural resources and combating climate change. (Special Issue: Traditional knowledge in disaster prediction/forecasting, management and climate change.) Indian J. Traditional Knowledge, 10 (1) : 71-79.

  • Doli, S. (2006). Sustainability of natural resource management in watershed development project. Ph.D Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, KARNATAKA (INDIA).

  • Eswarappa, G. (1991). An analysis of coordination and some management aspects of watershed development programme in Karnataka. Ph. D Thesis, Andhra Agriculture University, Hyderabad, A.P. (INDIA).

  • Iqbal, M. (1991). A study on the impact of watershed development programme in Nalgonda district of Andhra Pradesh. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Andhra Agriculture University, Hyderabad, A.P. (INDIA).

  • Jaiswal, N.K., Purnadare, A.P. and Yadappanwar, A.V. (1982). Planning and management of watersheds under drought prone area programme. J. Rural Develop., 4 :739.

  • Kadam, J.R., Patli, V.G. and Haridwar, D.P. (2001). Knowledge and adoption of soil and water conservation practices in watershed development project. Maharastra J. Extn. Edu., 20 : 138-140.

  • Khan, M.S. (1999). Critical analysis of eco-friendly technologies in rice cultivation. A study in an adopted villagekondubhotlopalem. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis. Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad, A.P. (INDIA).

  • Krishnamohan, R. (1992). Impact of social forestry programme on rural beneficiaries in Chittor district of Andhra Pradesh. M.Sc.(Ag.) Thesis, Andhra Agriculture University, Hyderabad, A.P. (INDIA).

  • Krishnamurthy, M. (1993). A study on adoption behaviour of beneficiaries towards recommended practices of watershed development programme in Ananthpur district of Andhra Pradesh. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Andhra Agriculture University, Hyderabad, A.P. (INDIA).

  • Prasad, K. (1990). A study on knowledge and adoption behaviuor of farmers towards recommended practices in Yerracheruvu model watershed development programme in Anatapur district of Andhra Pradesh. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Andhra Agriculture University, Hyderabad, A.P. (INDIA).

  • Raju, A. (2002). Analysis of selected factors responsible for sustainability of major crops production in a watershed area as perceived by farmers in Medak district of Andhra Pradesh. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad, A.P. (INDIA).

  • Rao, D. (1988). Impact of improved dryland agricultural technology in Chevella and Potuulabogunda model watershed development project in Jogipet taluk of Medak district in Andhra Pradesh. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad, A.P. (INDIA).

  • Reddy, C.V.G. (1996). An analysis of people participation in watershed development programme in Andhra Pradesh. Ph.D. Thesis, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad, A.P. (INDIA).


Abstract Views: 411

PDF Views: 1




  • A Study on Knowledge of Watershed Farmers on Various NRM Practices in Watershed Areas of Andhra Pradesh State

Abstract Views: 411  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

P. Archana
Department of Agricultural Extension, College of Agriculture, Prof. Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad (Telangana), India
M. Jagan Mohan Reddy
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Palem, Mahaboobnagar (Telangana), India
I. Sreenivasa Rao
Department of Agricultural Extension, College of Agriculture, Prof. Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad (Telangana), India

Abstract


The paper describes the level of knowledge of watershed farmers on various NRM practices in watershed areas of Andhra Pradesh state. The results indicated that majority of the watershed farmers fell under the category of medium (36.25%) level of knowledge followed by low (33.33%) and high (30.42%) level of knowledge. Further the rank wise analysis of level of knowledge of watershed farmers on various NRM practices infers that the usage of check dams to harvest the water has been perceived as first rank followed by usage of percolation tank for increasing the groundwater (II rank) and the least preferred knowledge items were NRM is possible only by the community participation (XIX rank), the grass which is highly recommended as vegetative barrier (XIX rank), the plants which are highly recommended for live fencing (XVIII rank) and gully formation can be checked by either building check dams or increasing width of gully, leaving it as it is and no idea (XVIII rank).

Keywords


NRM, Watershed Farmers, Knowledge.

References