Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Exploring Livelihood Security through Enhancement of Soybean Production on Farmer's Field of Dhar District of M.P.


Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Dhar (M.P.), India
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Shajapur (M.P.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Frontline demonstration (FLD) programme is an effective technology transfer tool for better technology adoption that bridges the yield gaps. Keeping in view of an effective extension approach of FLDs for dissemination of soybean technology were studied for 3 years during Kharif 2012-13 to 2014-15 by the KVK, Dhar district of Madhya Pradesh. An impact evaluation was based on the comparison of beneficiary and non-beneficiary respondents with reference to increase in knowledge level, extent of adoption of improved soybean production technologies, the yield gap analysis and economics were also measured. It was found that the level of knowledge of beneficiary farmers regarding different improved soybean production technologies was higher than non-beneficiary ranging from 2.00 MPS in field preparation to 30.00 MPS in seed inoculation with cultures. The overall significant difference was found in knowledge level of beneficiary and non-beneficiary farmers. The adoption level of beneficiary farmers observed 58 per cent and only 28 per cent have accepted but not adopted the technology due to some situational constraints. It is also revealing that there was a wide yield gap between potential and demonstration yields due to technology and extension yield gaps. Extension yield gaps varied to the extent of 4.10 to 9.42q ha-1 while technology gap ranged from 3.98 to 7.81q ha-1. Improved technologies gave higher mean net return of Rs. 46802/- ha-1 with a benefit cost ratio 3.34 as compared to farmers practice (Rs. 27066/- ha-1 and benefit cost ratio 2.59). On an average technology index was observed 24.03 per cent, which shows good performance of technical interventions.

Keywords

Front Line Demonstration, Yield, B:C, Economics, Extension Gap, Technological Gap, Technology Index, Rain Fed Agro-Ecosystem.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ahirwar, R. F., Nahatkar, S.B. and Sharma, H.O. (2007). Profitability and input use efficiency in cultivation of soybean in Malwa Plateau of Madhya Pradesh. Soybean Res., 5: 43-49.
  • Dixit, A.K., Tomar, D.S. and Saxena, Arvind (2009). Performance of soybean variety JS 95 60 under farm conditions in Malwa Plateaue of Madhya Pradesh. Soybean Res., 7: 64-72.
  • Katare, Subhash, Pandey, S.K. and Mustafa, Mohmad (2011). Yield gap analysis of rapeseed-mustard through front line demonstration. Agric. Update, 6 : 5-7.
  • Kumari, Vedna, Kumar, A., Kumar, A. and Bhateria, S. (2007). Demonstration-an effective tool for increasing the productivity of rape seed–mustard in Kangra district of Himachal Pradesh. Himachal J. Agric. Res., 33 (2): 257-261.
  • Kumawat, S.R. (2008). Impact of frontline demonstration on adoption of improved caster production technology. Rajasthan J. Extn. Edu., 16 : 143-147.
  • Lathwal, O.P. (2010). Evaluation of crop demonstrations on black gram in irrigated agro ecosystem. Annals Agric. Res., 31 (1&2) : 24-27.
  • Mankar, D. M., Wankhade, P. P. and Kale, N. M. (2014). Socio- economic impact of improved soybean technology on farmers. Internat. J. Extn. Edu., 10 : 146-152.
  • Meena, D. S., Ali, Mashiat, Baldev, Ram and Tetarwal, J.P. (2012). Impact of improved technology on soybean productivity in south eastern Rajasthan. Soybean Res., 10: 99-103.
  • Meena, K.C. (2011). An impact assessment of frontline demonstrations (FLDs) on soybean growers. Rajasthan J. Extn. Edu., 19 : 133-138.
  • Mitra, Biplab and Samajdar, T. (2010).Yield gap analysis of rapeseed-mustard through front line demonstration. Agric. Extn. Rev., 2 : 16 - 17.
  • Mokidue, I., Mohanty, A.K. and Sanjay, K. (2011). Correlating growth, yield and adoption of urd bean technologies. Indian J. Extn. Edu., 11 (2): 20-24.
  • Raghuwanshi, S., Tiwari, Abha and Agrawal, S.K. (2014). Constraints in adoption of improved production technology by soybean growers. J.N.K.V.V. Res. J., 48 (2) : 217-219.
  • Samui, S.K., Mitra, S., Roy, D.K., Manda, A.K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation of front line demonstration on groundnut. J. Indian Society Costal Agric. Res., 18 (2): 180-183.
  • Singh, Mamta, Dwivedi, A. P., Mishra, Anupam and Singh, S.R.K. (2015). Extent of adoption of improved soybean production practices in Sagar district of Madhya Pradesh. Soybean Res., 13(1): 65-71.
  • Tiwari, B.K and Tripathi, P.N. (2014). Yield gap analysis of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) through front line demonstration on farmer’s fields. J. Rural & Agric. Res., 14 (1): 5-6.
  • Yadav, V. P. S. and Kumar, R. (2007). Boosting pulse production through front line demonstration : An innovative approach. Agril. Extn. Rev., 31: 31-37.
  • SOPA (2013).The soybean processors association of India, Kharif, 2013. http/www.sopa.org /DATA/PRCROP Kharif, 2013 pdf.

Abstract Views: 285

PDF Views: 0




  • Exploring Livelihood Security through Enhancement of Soybean Production on Farmer's Field of Dhar District of M.P.

Abstract Views: 285  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

A. K. Badaya
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Dhar (M.P.), India
S. S. Chauhan
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Dhar (M.P.), India
S. S. Dhakad
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Shajapur (M.P.), India
G. S. Gathiye
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Dhar (M.P.), India

Abstract


Frontline demonstration (FLD) programme is an effective technology transfer tool for better technology adoption that bridges the yield gaps. Keeping in view of an effective extension approach of FLDs for dissemination of soybean technology were studied for 3 years during Kharif 2012-13 to 2014-15 by the KVK, Dhar district of Madhya Pradesh. An impact evaluation was based on the comparison of beneficiary and non-beneficiary respondents with reference to increase in knowledge level, extent of adoption of improved soybean production technologies, the yield gap analysis and economics were also measured. It was found that the level of knowledge of beneficiary farmers regarding different improved soybean production technologies was higher than non-beneficiary ranging from 2.00 MPS in field preparation to 30.00 MPS in seed inoculation with cultures. The overall significant difference was found in knowledge level of beneficiary and non-beneficiary farmers. The adoption level of beneficiary farmers observed 58 per cent and only 28 per cent have accepted but not adopted the technology due to some situational constraints. It is also revealing that there was a wide yield gap between potential and demonstration yields due to technology and extension yield gaps. Extension yield gaps varied to the extent of 4.10 to 9.42q ha-1 while technology gap ranged from 3.98 to 7.81q ha-1. Improved technologies gave higher mean net return of Rs. 46802/- ha-1 with a benefit cost ratio 3.34 as compared to farmers practice (Rs. 27066/- ha-1 and benefit cost ratio 2.59). On an average technology index was observed 24.03 per cent, which shows good performance of technical interventions.

Keywords


Front Line Demonstration, Yield, B:C, Economics, Extension Gap, Technological Gap, Technology Index, Rain Fed Agro-Ecosystem.

References