Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Yield Performance and Nutrient Content, Uptake as Influenced by Herbicides and Row Spacing in Wheat Crop (Triticum aestivum L.)


Affiliations
1 Department of Agronomy, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


A field experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2011-12 at Instructional Farm (Agronomy), Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur. The experiment consisted of six weed control treatments (pinoxaden 40 g ha-1, isoproturon 750 g ha-1, metribuzin 400 g ha-1, sulfosulfuron 25 g ha-1, idosulfuron 25 g ha-1 and weedy check) and three row spacings (17.5 cm, 20.0 cm and 22.5 cm) making eighteen combinations. These treatments were evaluated in Factorial Randomized Block Design with three replications.All the herbicide significantly increased N, P and K content and uptake by wheat grain as well as straw over weedy check. The maximum N, P and K uptake by crop was recorded with the application of isoproturon which was significantly superior over all other treatments. Row spacing did not differ significantly with nutrient content in grain and straw but nutrient uptake varied with row spacing. Row spacing of 17.5 cm recorded maximum N, P and K uptake by wheat grain and found superior to 20.0 and 22.5 cm row spacing in this respect while, uptake by straw did not differ significantly with each other.

Keywords

Wheat, Metribuzin, Isoproturon, Sulfosulfuron, Row Spacing, Herbicides, Content, Uptake.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Andrade, F.H., Calvino, A., Cirilo, A. and Barbieri, P. (2002). Yield responses to narrow rows depend on increased radiation interception. Agron. J., 94 : 975-980.
  • Auld, B.A., Kemp, D.R. and Medd, R.W. (1983). The influence of spatial arrangement on grain yield of wheat. Australian J. Agric. Res., 34 : 99-108.
  • Braun, H.J., Atlin, G. and Payne, T. (2010). Multi location testing as a tool to identify plant response to global climatic change. In: Climate change and crop production (ed. C.R.P. Reynolds) CABI, London, U.K.
  • Dev, Divakar, Singh, Vivek, Pal, Sheesh and Kumar, Ravindra (2013). Weed management studies in wheat (Triticum aestivum) with herbicides under different established methods. Indian J. Agron., 58 : 215-219.
  • Dixon, J., Braun, H.J. and Crouch, J.H. (2009). Overview: Transitioning wheat research to serve future needs of developing world. In: Wheat facts and futures (ed. J. Dixon, H.J. Braun, P. Kosina, and J.H. Crouch) CYMMIYT, Mexico.
  • Garcia-Martin, A., Lopez-Bellido, R. and Coleto, J. (2007). Fertilization and weed control effects on yield and weeds in durum wheat grown under rain-fed conditions in a Mediterranean climate.Weed Res., 47 : 140-148.
  • Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi.
  • Johari, A.K. and Singh, G. (1991). Herbicides cum cultural weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian J. Agron., 36: 54-59.
  • Kanojia, Y. and Nepalia, V. (2006). Effect of chemical weed control on nutrient uptake by wheat and associated weeds. Agric. Sci. Digest, 26 : 141 – 143.
  • Kumar, S.G., Singh, G. and Shivay, Y.S. (1998). Performance of tralkoxydim and isoproturon for broad spectrum weed control and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth. Indian J. Agron., 42 : 474-478.
  • Linder, R.C. (1944). Rapid analytical methods for some of the more common substances of plant and soil. Plant Physiol., 19 : 76-84.
  • Mahajan, G. and Sardana, Virender (2003). Nutrient uptake by wheat and phalaris minor as influenced by weed management practices. Agric. Sci. Digest, 23: 195 – 198.
  • Nanda, S.S. and Patro, S.S. (1996). Effect of weed management practices, row spacing and fertilizer levels on growth and yield of wheat. Indian J. Weed Sci., 28 : 67-69.
  • Reddy, T.Y. and Reddi, G.H. (2002). Plant population, principles of agronomy. Third Edition. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana. pp. 201
  • Richards, L.A. (1968). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils. USDA Handbook No. 60.
  • Singh, R.J. (2012). Weed management in irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum) with special reference to buttercup weed (Ranunculus spp.) in north-west Himalayas. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 82 : 706-710.
  • Yadav, A. and Malik, R.K. (2005). Herbicide resistantPhalaris minor in wheat-A sustainability issue. Resource book, Department of Agronomy and Directorate of extension Education, CCSHAU, Hisar, India. pp. 24 .
  • Yasin, M., Tanveer, A., Iqbal, Z. and Ali, A. (2010). Effect of herbicides on narrow leaved weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivumL.).World Academy Sci., Engg. & Technol., 68 : 1280-1282.

Abstract Views: 218

PDF Views: 0




  • Yield Performance and Nutrient Content, Uptake as Influenced by Herbicides and Row Spacing in Wheat Crop (Triticum aestivum L.)

Abstract Views: 218  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Mukesh Kumar Yadav
Department of Agronomy, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India
Jagdish Choudhary
Department of Agronomy, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India
Kiran Yadav
Department of Agronomy, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India

Abstract


A field experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2011-12 at Instructional Farm (Agronomy), Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur. The experiment consisted of six weed control treatments (pinoxaden 40 g ha-1, isoproturon 750 g ha-1, metribuzin 400 g ha-1, sulfosulfuron 25 g ha-1, idosulfuron 25 g ha-1 and weedy check) and three row spacings (17.5 cm, 20.0 cm and 22.5 cm) making eighteen combinations. These treatments were evaluated in Factorial Randomized Block Design with three replications.All the herbicide significantly increased N, P and K content and uptake by wheat grain as well as straw over weedy check. The maximum N, P and K uptake by crop was recorded with the application of isoproturon which was significantly superior over all other treatments. Row spacing did not differ significantly with nutrient content in grain and straw but nutrient uptake varied with row spacing. Row spacing of 17.5 cm recorded maximum N, P and K uptake by wheat grain and found superior to 20.0 and 22.5 cm row spacing in this respect while, uptake by straw did not differ significantly with each other.

Keywords


Wheat, Metribuzin, Isoproturon, Sulfosulfuron, Row Spacing, Herbicides, Content, Uptake.

References