International Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Performance in on Farm Trials of Mustard Varietis in Bhind District of Madhya Pradesh


Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The study was conducted in Bhind district of M.P. during 2014-15 to 2016-17. Total eighty on farm trails at farmers field in different villages i.e. Jaganpura, Bespura, Bhikampura, Chiruli, Ruhani Jagir and Devarikala during the years from active participation of district farmers with the to improve the productivity of mustard crop in the district. The improved technologies consist improved varieties i.e. NRCDR-02 and Pusha mustard 28 were trials at farmers field during the years. It has been seen that the improved variety of mustard i.e. NRCDR 02 recorded average higher yield (16.96 q/ha ), while it has been observed 16.01 q / ha. In case of pusa mustard 28. Farmers practice average yield during the years was observed 14.88 q/ ha. The average percentage in yield increased over farmers practice during the years was 11.03, while it was observed in case of NRCDR-02 and Pusa mustard 28 i.e. 12.57 and 9.48 per cent, respectively over farmers practice during the years. Pusa mustard 28 has taken less maturity days (about 14 to 20 days) as compared to NRCDR 02 and pusa mustard 28. The tabulation, mean, B.C. ratio and percentage have been used to draw the results from the data.

Keywords

On Farm Trials, Extension Gap, Technology Gap, Technology Index, Production Technology of Mustard.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ahmed, A. Guruprem and Kumar, R. (2013). Impact of frontline demonstrations on Indian mustard through improved technologies. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 13 (1) : 117-119.

  • Anonymous (2015). Annual progress report - DDA, Bhind (2014-15).

  • Bar, N. and Das, S. (2015). Enhancement of production and productivity of arhar crop through frony line demonstration. Internat. J. Innovat. Res. &Develop., 4 (5) : 1-3.

  • Dayanand, Verma R.K. and Mehta, S.M. (2012). Boosting mustard production through front line demonstration. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 12 (3): 121-123.

  • D.R.M.R., Vision 2050 (2015). Directorate of rapeseed mustard research, Bharatpur, Rajasthan: http://www.ICAR.org.in/ Vision%202050%2020DRMR% 20 Rajasthan.

  • Dutta, R. (2014). Yield gap analysis of rapseed-mustard in North Bank plain Zone of Assam. Indian Res.J.Ext.Edu., 14 (3): 122-124.

  • Indian Statistical (India statcom). (2014-15).

  • Kumar, R.(2013). Evaluation of crop technology demonstration of mustard crop in transitional plain of Inland Drainage Zone of Rajasthan. Internat. J. Agric. & Statist Sci., 9 (2):657-660.

  • Kumar, R. (2014). Crop technology demonstration: An effective communication approach for dissemination of wheat production technologies. Agric. Sci. Digest- A Res. J., 34 (2) : 131-134.

  • Kushwah, R.S.,Kumar, Rupendra, Sharma, U.C.,Bhadauria, N.S., Kushwaha, N.K. and Kumar, Chanda (2018). Impact of front line demonstration technologies on sesame crop yield in Bhind district (M.P.). Indian Res. J.Ext. Edu.,18 (2): 97-100.

  • Pandey, S., Manoj, K.M. and Tripathi, M.K. (2013). Study of inheritance of arucic acid in Indian mustard (Brassica Juncea L.). Octa J. Bio Sci., 1 : 77-84.

  • Patel, R.N.,Prajapati, M.M., Dhandhukia, R.D. and Chaudhary, F.K. (2014). Study of front line demonstration (FLD) on mustard. Adv. Res. Agri. Vet. Sci., 1 (2) : 62-64.

  • Patil, Lalit M., Modi, D.J., Vasava, H.M. and Gomkale, S.R. (2015). Evaluation of front line demonstration programme on green gram variety Meha (IPM-99-125) in Bharuch district of Gujarat (India).

  • Shekhawat, K., Rathore, S.S., Premi, O.P., Kandpal and Chauhan, J.S. (2012). Advances in agronomics management of Indian mustard [Brasica juncea (L) Czern. Cosson]: An overview. Internat. J. Agric., 1-14.doi:10.1155/2012/408284.

  • Singh, C., Singh, P. and Singh, R.(2009). Modern techniques of raising field crops. 2 Ed. Oxford and IHB Publishing Company Private Limited, New Delhi, India.

  • Singh, M., Poonia, M.K., Sharma, K.M., Goyal, M.C. and Kumhar, B.L. (2017).Yield gap analysis of mustard crop: A case study of village Chomakot in Kota district. Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett., 6 (22) : 671-675.

  • Singh, R.K., Singh, R.R., Singh, V.B. and Singh, A.K. (2014). Impact of technology adoption on productivity of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) under front line demonstration. Internat. J. Farm Sci., 4 (2) : 202-207.


Abstract Views: 573

PDF Views: 0




  • Performance in on Farm Trials of Mustard Varietis in Bhind District of Madhya Pradesh

Abstract Views: 573  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Rupendra Kumar
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), India
Raj Singh Kushwah
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), India
U. C. Sharma
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), India
Raj Pal Singh Tomar
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), India
Arvinder Kaur
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), India
V. S. Bhadauriya
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), India
S. K. Singh
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), India

Abstract


The study was conducted in Bhind district of M.P. during 2014-15 to 2016-17. Total eighty on farm trails at farmers field in different villages i.e. Jaganpura, Bespura, Bhikampura, Chiruli, Ruhani Jagir and Devarikala during the years from active participation of district farmers with the to improve the productivity of mustard crop in the district. The improved technologies consist improved varieties i.e. NRCDR-02 and Pusha mustard 28 were trials at farmers field during the years. It has been seen that the improved variety of mustard i.e. NRCDR 02 recorded average higher yield (16.96 q/ha ), while it has been observed 16.01 q / ha. In case of pusa mustard 28. Farmers practice average yield during the years was observed 14.88 q/ ha. The average percentage in yield increased over farmers practice during the years was 11.03, while it was observed in case of NRCDR-02 and Pusa mustard 28 i.e. 12.57 and 9.48 per cent, respectively over farmers practice during the years. Pusa mustard 28 has taken less maturity days (about 14 to 20 days) as compared to NRCDR 02 and pusa mustard 28. The tabulation, mean, B.C. ratio and percentage have been used to draw the results from the data.

Keywords


On Farm Trials, Extension Gap, Technology Gap, Technology Index, Production Technology of Mustard.

References