International Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Frontline Demonstration on Green Gram Yield Through Improved Technologies in Gwalior District of Madhya Pradesh


Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study was conducted in Gwalior district of Madhya Pradesh during 2007-08 to 2011-12 in 25.20 ha of land with 63 frontline demonstrations have been conducted in Nikodi, Udaipur, Sirol, Bhadrauli, Hiri villages of Gwalior in sandy loam to clay loam soils with the active participation of farmers with the objective to demonstrate the improved technologies of green gram. The improved technologies of green gram consisted of use of improved varieties, seed treatment with Rhizobium culture and PSB (Phosphate soluble bacteria), balance dose of fertilizers,YVM resistance varieties, integrated pest and diseases management and integrated weed management. The average yield of green gram in frontline demonstration recorded higher (9.65q/ ha) as compared to farmers practice (6.75 q/ha). The average increased in the demonstration yield over farmer’s practice was 42.96 per cent. The technology gap, extension gap and technology index were recorded 2.59 q/ha, 2.23 q/ha and 25.94 per cent, respectively. Improved technologies gave higher net return (Rs. 17685 per ha) with a benefit cost ratio 2.73 as compared to farmers practice (Rs.11463 / ha) benefit cost ratio 2.14.

Keywords

Frontline Demonstration, Green Gram, Technology Gap, Extension Gap, Technology Index, BC Ratio.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anonymous (2011). Agricultural studies division, directorate of economics and statics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, U.P. India.

  • Bar, N. and Das, S. (2015). Enhancement of production and productivity of Arhar crop through front line demonstration. Internat. J. Innovative Res. & Develop., 4 (5) :1-3.

  • Choudhary, B.N. (1999). Krishi Vigyan Kendra- a guide for KVK managers, Publication, Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR. 73-78pp.

  • Hiremath, S.M. and Nagaraju, M.V. (2010).Evaluation of onfarm frontline demonstration on the yield of chilli. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 23 (2) : 341-342.

  • Jeenger, K.L., Panwar, P. and Paree, K.O.P. (2006). Frontline demonstration on maize in Bhilwara district of Rajasthan. Current Agriculture, 30 (1/2) : 115-116.

  • Kannaiyan, S. (1999). Bioresource technology for sustainable agriculture. Associated Publicity Company, New Delhi, India, pp. 422.

  • Kiresur, V.R., Ramanna Rao, S.V. and Hedge, D.M. (2001). Improved technologies in oilseeds production an assessement of their economic potentials in India. Agriculturar Economics Research Review, 14 : 95-108.

  • Lalit, M., Patil, D.J., Modi, H.M. Vasava and Gomkale, S.R. (2015). Evaluation of frontline demonstration programme on green gram varity Meha (IPM 99-125) in Bharuch district of Gujarat. 10 SR J. Agric. & Vet. Sci., 8 (9) : 01-03.

  • Mokidue, I., Mohanti, A.K. and Sanjay, K. (2011).Correlation growth , yield and adoption of urd bean technologies. Indian J. Extn. Edu., 11 (2) : 20-24.

  • Patel, M.M., Jhajharia, A.K., Khadda, B.S. and Patil, L.M. (2013). Frontline demonstration: An effective communication approach for dissemination of sustainable cotton production technology. Indian J. Extn. Edu. & R D, 21: 60-62.

  • Poornia, T.C. and Pithia, M.S. (2011). Impact of frontline demonstration of chickpea in Gujarat. Legume Res., 34 (4) : 304-307.

  • Raj, A.D., Yadav, V. and Rathod, J.H. (2013). Impact of Front Line Demonstrations (FLD) on the yield of pulses. Internat. J. Scientific & Res. Publications, 3(9): 1-4.

  • Roy Burman, R., Singh, S.K., Singh, Lakhan and Singh, A.K. (2006). Adoption of improved pulses production technologies and related constraints in Utter Prades. Indian J. Pulses Res., 19 (1) : 104-106.

  • Samui, S.K., Maitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mandal, A.K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation on frontline demonstration on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 18: 180 - 183.

  • Jyothiswaroopa, V . Dmounica and Pavani, U. (2016). Impact of frontline demonstration (FLDs) on the yield of green gram, (Vigna radiate L ) in tribal belt of east Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh. Internat. J. Farm Sci., 6(1):169-173.


Abstract Views: 497

PDF Views: 0




  • Impact of Frontline Demonstration on Green Gram Yield Through Improved Technologies in Gwalior District of Madhya Pradesh

Abstract Views: 497  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Raj Singh Kushwah
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), India
Rupendra Kumar
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), India
S. K. Singh
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), India
Arvinder Kaur
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), India
V. S. Bhadauria
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), India

Abstract


The present study was conducted in Gwalior district of Madhya Pradesh during 2007-08 to 2011-12 in 25.20 ha of land with 63 frontline demonstrations have been conducted in Nikodi, Udaipur, Sirol, Bhadrauli, Hiri villages of Gwalior in sandy loam to clay loam soils with the active participation of farmers with the objective to demonstrate the improved technologies of green gram. The improved technologies of green gram consisted of use of improved varieties, seed treatment with Rhizobium culture and PSB (Phosphate soluble bacteria), balance dose of fertilizers,YVM resistance varieties, integrated pest and diseases management and integrated weed management. The average yield of green gram in frontline demonstration recorded higher (9.65q/ ha) as compared to farmers practice (6.75 q/ha). The average increased in the demonstration yield over farmer’s practice was 42.96 per cent. The technology gap, extension gap and technology index were recorded 2.59 q/ha, 2.23 q/ha and 25.94 per cent, respectively. Improved technologies gave higher net return (Rs. 17685 per ha) with a benefit cost ratio 2.73 as compared to farmers practice (Rs.11463 / ha) benefit cost ratio 2.14.

Keywords


Frontline Demonstration, Green Gram, Technology Gap, Extension Gap, Technology Index, BC Ratio.

References