International Journal of Advances in Social Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Market Orientation on Export Performance:Mediating Effect of External Turbulent Environment


Affiliations
1 Department of Management, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Agra, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Purpose-The aim of this paper is to investigate the relationship between Market Orientation (MO) (Proactive Market Orientation (PMO) and Responsive Market Orientation (RMO)) and Export Performance (EP), in addition to the mediating role of turbulent environment (Market Turbulence (MT) and Technological Turbulence (TT)) in shoe manufacturing industries.
Design/Methodology/Approach-Structured questionnaire were distributed to export managers or marketing managers of 80 shoe manufacturing companies which deal in export operating in Agra district cluster in India. Multiple regression analysis is performed to test the research hypotheses.
Findings-The results depict that both types of Market Orientation, that is, Proactive Market Orientation and Responsive Market Orientation positively affect Export Performance with Responsive Market Orientation having higher impact on Export Performance. The findings also suggest that the relationship between Proactive Market Orientation and Export Performance is stronger when the firms operate in high technological turbulent environment and low market turbulent environment. Likewise, in case of low market turbulence and high technological turbulence, the relationship between Responsive Market Orientation and Export Performance becomes weaker.
Research Limitations-A wider sample could have been used by including other export industries.
Practical Implications-This study is useful for shoe exporters to achieve their optimal level of proactive and responsive market orientation by considering environmental factors. It emphasizes the importance of both forms of market orientation in this dynamic environment.
Originality/Value-The paper can be useful for shoe manufacturing firms which deals in export to understand the effect of external environmental factors while formulating their marketing strategies.


Keywords

Market Orientation, Export Performance, External Environmental Factors.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Goon, A.M., Gupta, M.K. and Dasgupta, B. (1968), Fundamentals of Statistics (Vol. 2). Calcutta: Calcutta : The World Press Private Ltd.

  • Ahmet H. Kirca, S. J. (2005), “Market Orientation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of Its Antecedents and Impact on Performance”, Journal of Marketing,Vol. 69 No.2, pp. 24-41.

  • Akehurst, A. A. (2003), “An Investigation of Export Performance Variations Related to Corporate Export Market Orientation”, European Business Review,Vol. 15 No.1, pp. 5-19.

  • Bak-Olesen, N. (2013), “Proactive Market Orientation Effect on Export Performance (A Perspecitve from Small Danish Production Companies)”, Denmark: AARHUS UNIVERSITY.

  • Brendan Gray, S. M. (1998), “Developing a Better Measure of Market Orientation”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol 32 No.(9/10), pp. 884-903.

  • Carlos Daniel Alves Sousa, F. J.-L. (2008), “The Determinants of Export Performance: A Review of the Research in the Literature Between 1998 and 2005”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol.10 No.4, pp. 343-374.

  • Cheng-Hua Wang, K.-Y. C.-C. (2012), “Total Quality Management, Market Orientation and Hotel Performance: The Moderating Effects of External Environmental Factors”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol 31 No.1, pp.119-129.

  • Constantine S. Katsikeas, L. C. (2000), “Firm-Level Export Performance Assessment: Review, Evaluation, and Development”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol 28 No. 4, pp. 493-511.

  • Duerr, G. A. (1998), International marketing and export management (3rd Edition ed.). England: Prentice Hall.

  • Ferrell, B. A. (2000), “The Effect of Market Orientation on Product Innovation”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 28 No.2, pp. 239.

  • Hooley, B. J. (2002), “Guest Editorial: Market Orientation and Service Firm Performance – A Research Agenda”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol 36 No.9/10, pp. 980-989.

  • John C. Narver, S. F. (2004), “Responsive and Proactive Market Orientation and New-Product Success”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.21 No.5, pp. 334-347.

  • John W. Cadogan, C. C. (2003), “Export Market‐Oriented Behavior and Export Performance: The Moderating Roles of Competitive Intensity and Technological Turbulence”, International Marketing Review, Vol.20 No.5, pp. 493-513.

  • Kevin I. N. Ibeh, E. I. (2007), “Factors Stimulating Initial Export Activity. Any Difference for Nigerian Firms?”, Journal of African Business, Vol. 8 No.2, pp. 7-26.

  • Kline, R. B. (2010), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Methodology in the Social Sciences) (3 edition ed.). Guilford Press.

  • Kohli, B. J. (1993), “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 53-71.

  • Kuen-Hung Tsai, C. C.-H. (2008), “The Curvilinear Relationships between Responsive and Proactive Market Orientations and New Product Performance: A Contingent Link”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 37 No. 8, pp. 884-894.

  • Lages, L.F. and Souda, C.M.P. (2010), “Export Performance”, Wiley International Encyclopaedia of Marketing.

  • Lampert, G. A. (2001), “Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22 No. 6-7, pp. 521-543.

  • Leonidas C. Leonidou, C. S. (2007), “An Analytical Review of the Factors Stimulating Smaller Firms to Export: Implications for Policy‐Makers”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 24 No.6, pp. 735 - 770.

  • Leonidou, L. C. (1995), “Empirical Research on Export Barriers: Review, Assessment, and Synthesis”, Journal of International Marketing , Vol. 3 No.1, pp. 29-43.

  • March, J. G. (1991), “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning”, Organization Science, Vol. 2 No.1, pp. 71-85.

  • Moses Acquaah, M. C.-B. (2008), “Competitive Strategy, Environmental Characteristics and Performance in African Emerging Economies: Lessons from Firms in Ghana”, Journal of African Business, Vol. 9 No.1, pp. 93-120.

  • Olimpia C. Racela, C. C. (2007), “Market Orientation, International Business Relationships and Perceived Export Performance”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 24 No.2, pp. 144-163.

  • Raju, S. C. (2001), “The Impact of Environmental Uncertainty on the Market Orientation –Performance Relationship: A Study of the Hospital Industry”, Journal of Economic and Social Research,Vol. 3 No.1, pp. 5-27.

  • Salavou, H. (2002), “Profitability in Market-Oriented SMEs: Does Product Innovation Matter?”, European Journal of. Innovation Management, Vol. 5 No.3, pp. 164-171.

  • Sanjeev Agarwal, M. K. (2003), “Market Orientation and Performance in Service Firms: Role of Innovation”, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 17 No.1, pp. 68-82.

  • Shahid Qureshi, S. A. (2010), “Antecedents and Outcomes of Entrepreneurial Firms Marketing Capabilities: An Empirical Investigation of Small Technology Based Firms”, Journal of Strategy, Vol. 6 No.4, pp. 28-45.

  • Slater, N.‐E. A. (1989), “Management Influences on Export Performance: A Review of the Empirical Literature 1978‐1988”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 6 No.4, pp. 7-26.

  • Sousa, M C. and Alserhan. A. B. (2002), “An Investigation into the Antecedents of the Export Performance. Competitive Paper”, University College Dublin.

  • Subramanian, R., Kumar, K., and Strandholm, K., (2009), “The Relationship between Market Orientation and Performance Under Different Environmental Conditions: The Moderating Effect of the Top Management Team’s Risk Taking Behaviour”, Academy of Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 8, pp. 121-135.

  • Tesfom .G. and Litz. C. (2006), “A Classification of Export Marketing Problems of Small and Medium Sized Manufacturing Firms in Developing Countries”, International Journal of Emerging Markets, Vol. 1 No.3, pp. 262-28.

  • Williams, J. E. (2006), “Export Marketing Information‐Gathering and Processing in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 24 No.5, pp. 477-492.

  • Wooldrige, J.M., 2008, “Introductory econometrics: A modern approach”, 4 edn. SAGE.

  • Xinming He, K. D. (2013), “Resource-Based and Institutional Perspectives on Export Channel Selection and Export Performance”, Journal of Management, Vol.39, pp. 27-47.

  • Yassin, N. A. (2010), “How Will Market Orientation and External Environment Influence the Performance Among SMEs in the Agri-Food Sector in Malaysia?”, International Business Research, Vol. 3 No.3, pp. 154-164.

  • Yejing Wang, D. Z. (2013), “Environmental Determinants of Responsive and Proactive Market Orientations”, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 28 No.7, pp. 565-576.


Abstract Views: 286

PDF Views: 0




  • Impact of Market Orientation on Export Performance:Mediating Effect of External Turbulent Environment

Abstract Views: 286  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ishika Agarwal
Department of Management, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Agra, India
Sanjeev Swami
Department of Management, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Agra, India
Shalini Nigam
Department of Management, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Agra, India

Abstract


Purpose-The aim of this paper is to investigate the relationship between Market Orientation (MO) (Proactive Market Orientation (PMO) and Responsive Market Orientation (RMO)) and Export Performance (EP), in addition to the mediating role of turbulent environment (Market Turbulence (MT) and Technological Turbulence (TT)) in shoe manufacturing industries.
Design/Methodology/Approach-Structured questionnaire were distributed to export managers or marketing managers of 80 shoe manufacturing companies which deal in export operating in Agra district cluster in India. Multiple regression analysis is performed to test the research hypotheses.
Findings-The results depict that both types of Market Orientation, that is, Proactive Market Orientation and Responsive Market Orientation positively affect Export Performance with Responsive Market Orientation having higher impact on Export Performance. The findings also suggest that the relationship between Proactive Market Orientation and Export Performance is stronger when the firms operate in high technological turbulent environment and low market turbulent environment. Likewise, in case of low market turbulence and high technological turbulence, the relationship between Responsive Market Orientation and Export Performance becomes weaker.
Research Limitations-A wider sample could have been used by including other export industries.
Practical Implications-This study is useful for shoe exporters to achieve their optimal level of proactive and responsive market orientation by considering environmental factors. It emphasizes the importance of both forms of market orientation in this dynamic environment.
Originality/Value-The paper can be useful for shoe manufacturing firms which deals in export to understand the effect of external environmental factors while formulating their marketing strategies.


Keywords


Market Orientation, Export Performance, External Environmental Factors.

References