International Journal of Advances in Social Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Legal Theories propounded by Bentham and Austin: A comparative study


Affiliations
1 Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur, C.G., India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Over the last century, the study of jurisprudence had been filled with various debates on what is law and its relationship with morality. The former, according to Hart, were met with many literatures. The latter too were not short of academic contributions. These debates have not only enriched the study of jurisprudence, they also have an impact on our society as a whole. As Green rightly puts it, “we need such a theory, not to help decide cases or defend clients, but to understand ourselves, our culture, and our institutions, and to promote serious moral assessment of those institutions, and to promote serious moral assessment of those institutions, an assessment that must always take into account the conflicting realities of life”. Central to these debates is the legal positivism theory. Legal positivism “is a whole tradition of thought, spanning over two centuries, comprised of numerous contributions that often diverge, sometimes even conflict, on key issues”.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • V.D. Mahajan, Jurisprudence and Legal Theory, Eastern Book Co.

  • Wayne Morrison, Jurisprudence: from the Greeks to postmodernism

  • Salmond on Jurisprudence.

  • Ram Ahuja , Indian Social System, Rawat Publications.

  • Paul B. Horton and Chested L. Hunt, Sixth Edition, Tata Mcgraw Hill Education Private Limited.

  • Bowring edition, vol 8, p 322; Hart Bentham

  • DIAS.

  • See, Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, W. Rumble (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995) (first published, 1832).

  • Austin John, “The Province of Jurisprudence Determined” p.86.

  • Dias R W M Jurisprudence, 5th edition, Butterworth and Co. (Publishers) Ltd. 1994, pp.344.

  • Austin John, “The Province of Jurisprudence Determined” p.86.

  • M.D.A. Freemen, Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence, 8th ed., Sweet and Maxwell, p. 292.

  • Bix, Brian H., “Legal Positivism,” in The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Martin P. Golding and William A. Edmundson, eds., Oxford: Blackwell, 2004), pp. 29-49.

  • Cotterrell a term from Justice. J.C. Smart


Abstract Views: 795

PDF Views: 0




  • Legal Theories propounded by Bentham and Austin: A comparative study

Abstract Views: 795  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

S. Shubhang
Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur, C.G., India

Abstract


Over the last century, the study of jurisprudence had been filled with various debates on what is law and its relationship with morality. The former, according to Hart, were met with many literatures. The latter too were not short of academic contributions. These debates have not only enriched the study of jurisprudence, they also have an impact on our society as a whole. As Green rightly puts it, “we need such a theory, not to help decide cases or defend clients, but to understand ourselves, our culture, and our institutions, and to promote serious moral assessment of those institutions, and to promote serious moral assessment of those institutions, an assessment that must always take into account the conflicting realities of life”. Central to these debates is the legal positivism theory. Legal positivism “is a whole tradition of thought, spanning over two centuries, comprised of numerous contributions that often diverge, sometimes even conflict, on key issues”.

References